Design News is part of the Informa Markets Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Scientists Learn More About what Makes Batteries Fail

Batteries, failing batteries, Rice University, pressure of rapid charging and discharging, cathodes
While adding defects to batteries makes them perform better, too many can cause instability, Rice University scientists discovered.

Rice University researchers have extended recent work that shows how defects can actually improve the performance of lithium-ion batteries, demonstrating how too much stress in cathodes used in these new battery designs can lead to cracks and device instability.

The work—led by Rice materials scientist Ming Tang, who worked with Rice graduate student Kaiqi Yang—further advances research on how to build batteries in the future that have optimal performance without degrading rapidly.

At left, a 3D model by Rice University materials scientists shows a phase boundary as a delithiating lithium iron phosphate cathode undergoes rapid discharge. At right, a cross-section shows the “fingerlike” boundary between iron phosphate (blue) and lithium (red). Rice engineers found that too many intentional defects intended to make batteries better can in fact degrade their performance and endurance. (Image source: Rice University Mesoscale Materials Science Group)

New simulations conducted by Tang and Yang show that while their previous work can indeed make batteries charge more rapidly, this fast charge-and-discharge cycle can degrade their performance and endurance.

Specifically, their experiments found that under the pressure of rapid charging and discharging, cathodes that they created with intentional defects—which actually serve to improve performance—become unstable and become susceptible to fracture, researchers found. “The conventional picture is that lithium moves uniformly into the cathode, with a lithium-rich region that expands smoothly into the cathode’s center,” Tang, an assistant professor of materials science and nanoengineering, explained.

However, after examining X-ray images of the cathode researchers found the scenario happening in the battery is something quite different, he said. Researchers found “a fingerlike boundary between the lithium-rich and lithium-poor regions, almost like when you inject water into oil,” Tang said.

Less Is More

As Design News previously reported, the Rice team worked specifically with lithium iron phosphate-based cathodes, focusing on the phase transition the cathode makes from iron phosphate to lithium iron phosphate when charging. Researchers discovered that by adding defects, called antisites, to the crystal lattices of the cathodes could help them to charge faster.

In their recent work, he and Yang set out to find the root cause of reason why the lithium does not spread evenly in the cathode. What they discovered is that the problem seems to be that stress destabilizes the initially flat boundary and causes it to become wavy.

This change in boundary shape only makes the stress level worse, triggering crack formation, researchers said. Moreover, the reason for the increase in instability is the antisites—or spots iron atoms occupy spots in the crystal where lithium atoms should be—that they themselves created in the battery, Tang said.

“Antisites can be a good thing, as we showed in the last paper, because they accelerate the lithium intercalation kinetics,” he said. “But here we show a countereffect: Too many antisites in the particles encourage the moving interface to become unstable and therefore generate more stress.”

The team published a paper on their work in the Journal of Materials Chemistry A.

Researchers believe that a positive outcome from this latest work is that it demonstrates that while antisites can be used to improve battery performance, less is more if scientists don’t want the battery to degrade rapidly. In other words, researchers can add defects, but only enough to enhance performance, not so many that the battery becomes unstable. “You want to have a suitable level of defects, and it will require some trial and error to figure out how to reach the right amount through annealing the particles,” Tang said. “We think our new predictions might be useful to experimentalists.”

Elizabeth Montalbano is a freelance writer who has written about technology and culture for more than 20 years. She has lived and worked as a professional journalist in Phoenix, San Francisco and New York City. In her free time she enjoys surfing, traveling, music, yoga and cooking. She currently resides in a village on the southwest coast of Portugal.

Hide comments


  • Allowed HTML tags: <em> <strong> <blockquote> <br> <p>

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.