The Case of the Buckling Brace

DN Staff

November 23, 2009

3 Min Read
The Case of the Buckling Brace

A titanium brace succumbs to fatigue failure, reminding engineers that “one-size-fits-all” isn’t always a good strategy when designing parts

By Contributing Writer Ken Russell

Titanium is a design engineers’ dream and a process metallurgists’ nightmare. The strengths and ductilities of titanium alloys are comparable with those in steels, but the density is over a third less. This weight savings is crucial in aerospace applications where high-strength titanium forgings made jumbo jets possible.

Titanium, like aluminum and chromium, reacts with air to form a very thin protective oxide film. The resulting corrosion resistance makes titanium alloys competitive with stainless steel for many applications.

Unfortunately, titanium is nearly a universal solvent and dissolves almost everything it contacts. This reactivity makes it very difficult to process. Even though titanium ores are fairly abundant, the refined metal is expensive. Titanium costs about as much as premium steak; stainless steel costs about as much as peanut butter.

This case involves the failure of a titanium alloy leg brace. The alternative materials would have been stainless steel or aluminum alloys. Apparently, the lighter weight of titanium made it preferable to stainless steel. Titanium is much stronger than aluminum, so it could be used to produce a less bulky brace. The brace broke at the knee joint, causing the wearer to fall and suffer serious injury. I was retained by one of
the defendants in the case. We were limited to strictly nondestructive testing, and not even a minimally invasive hardness test was allowed.

I suspected fatigue failure, but the parts of the brace were too large to fit in the scanning electron microscope (SEM). (See “The Case of the Jelly Roll Blues.) We had to use replication of the surface to study the fracture. A plastic dental replicating compound was spread on the fracture surface and allowed to harden. The replica was then shadowed with a very thin layer of metal to make it electrically conducting, and studied in the SEM. Study of the replica revealed the fine striations characteristic of fatigue failure.

Fatigue failure occurs under cyclic load. A crack starts at an irregularity known as a stress riser and proceeds little by little with each stress cycle. Finally the crack weakens the piece enough that sudden catastrophic failure occurs. In this case, walking provided the cyclic stress and the sudden final failure caused the injury.
This case was peculiar in that both sides of the brace had undergone the same amount of fatigue damage. Most fatigue failures are started by nicks or dings that are unlikely to occur on both sides of the brace. But the brace clearly failed, and my job was to figure out why.

Could the brace have been made of faulty titanium? The The brace was made of rolled strap, and rolled material is rarely defective. The material in the brace was a very small part of a large batch of strap. If one piece was defective, the whole batch probably was. It appeared that the brace may have been under-designed. I asked my client if the plaintiff was large. The answer came back yes, she weighed some 300 lb. She was one of the last of the pre-Salk vaccine polio victims.

The case settled shortly after my study and I never learned any more about the matter. My suspicion, though, was that the brace was designed on a “One Size Fits All” basis and was suitable for some “average” 150-lb user. Such a brace would not be suitable for a user twice this weight. On the other hand, a 90-lb user would be carrying around a heavier brace than she needed.

In an earlier investigation, The Case of the Lamed Lothario, the plaintiff had a reputation as a bedroom athlete. One defense lawyer suggested that amatory activity might have caused the failure. I concluded that such was likely to be the case then. Such a cause is even less likely now in that the plaintiff is a woman.

Contributing Writer Ken Russell ([email protected]) is Professor Emeritus of Metallurgy and Nuclear Engineering at MIT. He specializes in physical metallurgy, forensic metallurgy and failure analysis. Cases presented here are drawn from his actual forensic files.

Sign up for the Design News Daily newsletter.

You May Also Like