GM Chooses Micro- Over Mild-Hybrid in New Malibu

In a move that highlights the rise of micro-hybrid technology in next-generation vehicles, General Motors has chosen to stick with start-stop technology on its 2014 Chevy Malibu, while discarding a more costly mild hybrid system.

Charles Murray

October 16, 2013

3 Min Read
GM Chooses Micro- Over Mild-Hybrid in New Malibu

In a move that highlights the rise of micro-hybrid technology in next-generation vehicles, General Motors (GM) has chosen to stick with start-stop technology on its 2014 Chevy Malibu, while discarding a more costly mild hybrid system.

GM said that it made the decision because start-stop, along with certain engine enhancements, can provide similar fuel economy benefits, while eliminating the need for customers to pay for a feature that includes an extra lithium-ion battery. The start-stop (or micro-hybrid) version of the mid-sized sedan would use a pair of small lead-acid batteries and a 12V electrical architecture. ”A start-stop system with a 12V lead-acid battery is very cost effective, especially if you’re able to combine it with enhancements to your internal combustion engine,” GM spokesman Kevin Kelly told Design News.

The 2014 Chevy Malibu offers start-stop technology by employing lead-acid batteries in the front and rear.
(Source: General Motors)

The new Malibu uses a 2.5-liter V-6 engine that includes fuel-saving features, such as direct injection and variable valve timing. Each of those features is said to provide a fuel efficiency boost of a few percent. When combined with start-stop technology, in which the engine is turned off at traffic lights and stop signs, a fuel efficiency gain of as much as 15 percent is possible.

Chevrolet previously offered a version of the Malibu that included a feature called eAssist, which is generically described as a “mild hybrid” technology. A mild-hybrid incorporates a start-stop system, regenerative braking technology, and a power-assist for the engine. To do that, the vehicle needs additional components, including a belted alternator-starter, lithium-ion battery, and a higher-voltage electrical architecture (GM’s e-Assist uses a 110V architecture). GM said it will keep the eAssist system on other vehicles, including the Buick LaCrosse, Buick Regal, and Chevy Impala.

Up until now, the auto industry has considered mild-hybrid technology to be a stepping stone between the micro-hybrid and full hybrid (such as the Toyota Prius). In general, micro-hybrids offered a 5 percent efficiency bump, whereas mild-hybrids offered 15 percent. Industry analysts are now saying that engine advancements are potentially blurring the line between the two.

”As internal combustion engines get more efficient -- smaller displacement, less cylinders, and turbocharging -- they give a substantial boost to fuel efficiency, which is then made even better by micro-hybridization,” Lux Research analyst Cosmin Laslau wrote in an email to Design News. “That’s what happened with the Chevy Malibu: The micro-hybrid became so good, it matched the more expensive mild hybrid, so there was no reason to keep the latter around. Look for this trend to continue -- mild hybrids are an endangered species.”

Related posts:

  • {doclink 268362}

  • {doclink 268127}

  • {doclink 267926}

  • {doclink 267878}

  • {doclink 267833}

  • {doclink 267339}

  • {doclink 267317}

  • {doclink 266142}

  • {doclink 266450}

  • {doclink 266188}

  • {doclink 266061}

  • {doclink 265790}

  • {doclink 265529}

  • {doclink 265157}

  • {doclink 264712}

  • {doclink 263072}

  • {doclink 261927}

  • {doclink 261782}

  • {doclink 261236}

  • {doclink 260529}

  • {doclink 259550}

  • {doclink 258495}

  • {doclink 258113}

  • {doclink 257628}

  • {doclink 256966}

  • {doclink 255754}

  • {doclink 255564}

  • {doclink 255380}

  • {doclink 255191}

  • {doclink 255091}

  • {doclink 254150}

  • {doclink 252881}

  • {doclink 251534}

  • {doclink 251483}

  • {doclink 250517}

  • {doclink 250256}

  • {doclink 249928}

  • {doclink 249519}

  • {doclink 248442}

  • {doclink 246722}

  • {doclink 246644}

  • {doclink 245676}

  • {doclink 245442}

  • {doclink 244906}

  • {doclink 244832}

  • {doclink 244669}

  • {doclink 242498}

  • {doclink 242424}

  • {doclink 242108}

  • {doclink 241552}

  • {doclink 241175}

  • {doclink 240962}

  • {doclink 240363}

  • {doclink 240303}

  • {doclink 239766}

  • {doclink 238863}

  • {doclink 237768}

  • {doclink 237698}

  • {doclink 237534}

  • {doclink 237329}

  • {doclink 237015}

  • {doclink 236557}

  • {doclink 235252}

  • {doclink 235241}

  • {doclink 235140}

  • {doclink 234687}

  • {doclink 234367}

  • {doclink 234251}

  • {doclink 233282}

  • {doclink 233004}

  • {doclink 229120}

  • {doclink 228520}

About the Author(s)

Charles Murray

Charles Murray is a former Design News editor and author of the book, Long Hard Road: The Lithium-Ion Battery and the Electric Car, published by Purdue University Press. He previously served as a DN editor from 1987 to 2000, then returned to the magazine as a senior editor in 2005. A former editor with Semiconductor International and later with EE Times, he has followed the auto industry’s adoption of electric vehicle technology since 1988 and has written extensively about embedded processing and medical electronics. He was a winner of the Jesse H. Neal Award for his story, “The Making of a Medical Miracle,” about implantable defibrillators. He is also the author of the book, The Supermen: The Story of Seymour Cray and the Technical Wizards Behind the Supercomputer, published by John Wiley & Sons in 1997. Murray’s electronics coverage has frequently appeared in the Chicago Tribune and in Popular Science. He holds a BS in engineering from the University of Illinois at Chicago.

Sign up for the Design News Daily newsletter.

You May Also Like