J.D. Power's 2024 Worst Car Brands for DependabilityJ.D. Power's 2024 Worst Car Brands for Dependability

J.D. Power's annual dependability survey reveals three years of experience with 2021 models.

Dan Carney, Senior Editor

February 12, 2024

19 Slides
Nobody likes it when their car needs to be towed.

Already have an account?

Nobody likes it when their car needs to be towed.Jean-Christophe Magnenet/AFP via Getty Images

At a Glance

  • Drivers complained about infotainment systems
  • Driver assistance systems also caused annoyance
  • Electrified drivetrains are adding complexity that causes trouble

J.D. Power's 2024 survey of drivers provides us with a list of 2021's most dependable models after three years on the road. On the flip side, they also name which brands' cars scored below average in the survey.

The survey found an average of 190 problems per 100 vehicles (PP100), which means that the average 2021 car in the survey had 1.90 problems during the last three years. The worst-scoring brands had more problems than that, with the last-place brand averaging a dismal 310 PP100, which indicates more than three problems for each of those cars in three years.

The study covers 184 specific problem areas across nine major vehicle categories: climate; driving assistance; driving experience; exterior; features/controls/ displays; infotainment; interior; powertrain; and seats.

Infotainment systems continue to annoy and confuse, so drivers dinged their cars for these confounding systems. They were the source of 49.1 PP100 among the surveyed vehicles.

Driver assistance systems like lane departure warnings and automatic emergency braking also earned drivers' ire due to their frequent false alarms.

These examples illustrate the fact that the definition of “dependability” doesn't usually mean that the car broke down. Instead, it often depends on the ease of use of vehicles' many electronic systems.

Click through our gallery to see which brands ended up at the bottom of J.D. Power’s dependability list.

About the Author

Dan Carney

Senior Editor, Design News

Dan’s coverage of the auto industry over three decades has taken him to the racetracks, automotive engineering centers, vehicle simulators, wind tunnels, and crash-test labs of the world.

A member of the North American Car, Truck, and Utility of the Year jury, Dan also contributes car reviews to Popular Science magazine, serves on the International Engine of the Year jury, and has judged the collegiate Formula SAE competition.

Dan is a winner of the International Motor Press Association's Ken Purdy Award for automotive writing, as well as the National Motorsports Press Association's award for magazine writing and the Washington Automotive Press Association's Golden Quill award.

AstonMartinVanquish_©AndyMorgan_025_copy_2.JPG

He has held a Sports Car Club of America racing license since 1991, is an SCCA National race winner, two-time SCCA Runoffs competitor in Formula F, and an Old Dominion Region Driver of the Year award winner. Co-drove a Ford Focus 1.0-liter EcoBoost to 16 Federation Internationale de l’Automobile-accredited world speed records over distances from just under 1km to over 4,104km at the CERAM test circuit in Mortefontaine, France.

He was also a longtime contributor to the Society of Automotive Engineers' Automotive Engineering International magazine.

He specializes in analyzing technical developments, particularly in the areas of motorsports, efficiency, and safety.

He has been published in The New York Times, NBC News, Motor Trend, Popular Mechanics, The Washington Post, Hagerty, AutoTrader.com, Maxim, RaceCar Engineering, AutoWeek, Virginia Living, and others.

Dan has authored books on the Honda S2000 and Dodge Viper sports cars and contributed automotive content to the consumer finance book, Fight For Your Money.

He is a member and past president of the Washington Automotive Press Association and is a member of the Society of Automotive Engineers

Sign up for Design News newsletters

You May Also Like