SpaceX Crew Dragon Perfected by Continuous Development

Engineers have made numerous improvements and changes since the capsule's 2014 introduction in Washington, D.C.

Dan Carney, Senior Editor

May 27, 2020

4 Min Read
SpaceX Crew Dragon Perfected by Continuous Development

Dan_20Carney_20SpaceX_20Crew_20Dragon_20prototype_0.jpg

The very first SpaceX Crew Dragon prototype. Image source: Dan Carney

On the balmy afternoon of June 10, 2014, SpaceX CEO Elon Musk publicly unveiled the Crew Dragon space capsule at Washington, D.C.’s Newseum for an assembled crowd of guests from Congress, NASA, and the media.

The matte white Crew Dragon lounged beneath a sunshade on the sidewalk as guests, including your humble correspondent, took turns ascending the stairs and clambering inside to imagine a flight to space. The test article displayed that day was no mere mockup; SpaceX engineers on hand grumbled that their test schedule had been interrupted by this trip to the East Coast for their prized prototype.

Dan_20Carney_20Space_20X_20Elon_20Musk_0.jpg

Elon Musk (right) addresses reporters at the Newseum. Image source: Dan Carney

Musk was the proud papa that day, touting the numerous features of the Crew Dragon (then called Dragon 2). Some of those features will be tested in this week’s maiden crewed launch to the International Space Station, while others have been modified or dropped entirely.

Dan_20Carney_20SpaceX_20Crew_20Dragon_20display_0.jpg

The control panel in the 2014 Crew Dragon prototype. Image source: Dan Carney

Inside the capsule, the most striking aspect is the twin array of duplicate touch screen displays (one pair for each pilot) that are astronauts’ primary means of controlling their craft. Experience using touch screens in cars suggests that during a bumpy ride it can be challenge to press the intended spot on the screen, so it will be interesting to see how well these systems work on a machine that is flying to space rather than sitting stationary for a media extravaganza.

SpaceX has provided a shared central console between the displays that is equipped with physical buttons and switches for critical functions during ascent and descent, so it could be the touch screen interface is only used when gliding smoothly in zero-g orbit.

Astronauts Doug Hurley and Bob Behnken practice using the current iteration of the Crew Dragon's display. Image source: NASA

Outside, the Crew Dragon’s massive Super Draco engines’ black exhaust nozzles dominate the capsule’s appearance. At the time of introduction, the Crew Dragon was going to use these engines for propulsive touch-down on land, like the rockets of science fiction. Musk explained his interest in this capability as an opportunity to test it for future use on Mars, where there’s no water for splashdown and the air is too thin for parachutes to be as effective as on Earth.

"It is a step in the direction of Mars," Musk explained of the Crew Dragon’s landing system. "For Mars you need propulsive landing. You have to get really good at it." 

The Crew Dragon splashed down at the conclusion of the previous uncrewed test flight to the International Space Station. Image source: NASA/Corey Huston

Alas, SpaceX has since decided to revert to traditional water landings for Crew Dragon. The director of crew operations, Garrett Reisman, initially told Congress on Feb 27, 2015, that it would fly the early missions using water landings, but the company subsequently dropped dry landings using retro rockets entirely.

Now, the Super Dracos’ sole job is for emergency aborts, both from the launch pad and during flight, when the capsule needs to be lifted away from its Falcon 9 booster. SpaceX has successfully tested the Super Draco engines in both modes, but not without some drama along the way.

SpaceX_20Crew_20Dragon_20In_20Flight_20Abort_0_0.jpg

A SpaceX rendering of the in-flight abort test firing of the Crew Dragon's Super Draco abort engines. Image source: SpaceX

During an April 20, 2019 abort test the Super Draco engines exploded just before they were to ignite, destroying the Crew Dragon test article in a fireball. Subsequent analysis revealed that a small amount of nitrogen tetroxide had leaked into a helium pressurization line. When that line pressurized to 2,400 psi in preparation for ignition, the nitrogen tetroxide slammed into a check valve, causing the explosion.

Now, Crew Dragons use burst discs in place of check valves. Unlike valves, burst discs cannot leak, ensuring that nitrogen tetroxide stays where it belongs. Such is the process of engineering development, as described by Hans Koenigsmann, SpaceX vice president of build and reliability. "This was a ground test, it was not a flight test," he said. "We do ground tests so we can learn, and in this case we learned a lot, maybe almost more than what we wanted. It was certainly something we didn't expect and a great lesson for us."

NASA_20Kim_20Shiflett_20Crew_20Dragon_20Abort_0.jpg

The Crew Dragon's Super Draco engines lift it off during the successful launch pad abort test. Image source: NASA/Kim Shiflett

 

These changes and setbacks along the way have delayed the first crewed flight of the Crew Dragon until now. Back in 2014, Musk predicted the first crewed flight would be in 2016 and that he might fly aboard a Dragon himself a couple years after that.

The timetable has moved back, as happens in spaceflight. It will be interesting to hear Musk’s current plans for an orbital trip now that the possibility is becoming real. If he’s changed his mind in the intervening years, we’ll happily go in his stead.

Dan Carney is a Design News senior editor, covering automotive technology, engineering and design, especially emerging electric vehicle and autonomous technologies.

About the Author

Dan Carney

Senior Editor, Design News

Dan’s coverage of the auto industry over three decades has taken him to the racetracks, automotive engineering centers, vehicle simulators, wind tunnels, and crash-test labs of the world.

A member of the North American Car, Truck, and Utility of the Year jury, Dan also contributes car reviews to Popular Science magazine, serves on the International Engine of the Year jury, and has judged the collegiate Formula SAE competition.

Dan is a winner of the International Motor Press Association's Ken Purdy Award for automotive writing, as well as the National Motorsports Press Association's award for magazine writing and the Washington Automotive Press Association's Golden Quill award.

AstonMartinVanquish_©AndyMorgan_025_copy_2.JPG

He has held a Sports Car Club of America racing license since 1991, is an SCCA National race winner, two-time SCCA Runoffs competitor in Formula F, and an Old Dominion Region Driver of the Year award winner. Co-drove a Ford Focus 1.0-liter EcoBoost to 16 Federation Internationale de l’Automobile-accredited world speed records over distances from just under 1km to over 4,104km at the CERAM test circuit in Mortefontaine, France.

He was also a longtime contributor to the Society of Automotive Engineers' Automotive Engineering International magazine.

He specializes in analyzing technical developments, particularly in the areas of motorsports, efficiency, and safety.

He has been published in The New York Times, NBC News, Motor Trend, Popular Mechanics, The Washington Post, Hagerty, AutoTrader.com, Maxim, RaceCar Engineering, AutoWeek, Virginia Living, and others.

Dan has authored books on the Honda S2000 and Dodge Viper sports cars and contributed automotive content to the consumer finance book, Fight For Your Money.

He is a member and past president of the Washington Automotive Press Association and is a member of the Society of Automotive Engineers

Sign up for Design News newsletters

You May Also Like