Ann R. Thryft

December 6, 2011

2 Min Read
Composite Aircraft Repair Advances

Ease of repair is reportedly one of the main reasons the Canadian airplane maker Bombardier Aerospace has chosen not to use carbon- or glass-fiber composites in the main fuselage of its composite-heavy CSeries aircraft. The high-cycle aircraft, due to enter service in 2013, is expected to sustain a lot of impact damage from ground support equipment. Since repair and maintenance standards are often based on the performance of metal-based planes, damage is easier to identify and repair in metal portions of aircraft using current techniques.

Unlike the Boeing 787 Dreamliner and the Airbus A350 XWB, the fuselage of the two CSeries models is constructed primarily of aluminum-lithium. Composites are used in the empennage, rear fuselage, nacelle, and wings. Altogether, the advanced materials give the plane a 2,000-pound weight savings.

Problems surrounding the repair and maintenance of composite aircraft have become much more visible since a GAO report questioned the safety of repair and maintenance procedures for Boeing 787 Dreamliner composites. That report said impact damage to composite structures may be difficult to detect, since that type of damage isn't as easy to see as impact damage to metals.

In addition, the nondestructive inspection techniques commonly used on in-service aircraft for detecting and characterizing composite damage vary with each composite's construction methods and with the particular type of damage done. For example, the 787 uses at least two different types of carbon-fiber composites: carbon laminate and carbon sandwich. So repair and maintenance technicians aren't as likely to find damage in the first place if they don't use the correct technique for finding it in a given material.

Compounding that problem is the fact that composite repair itself deploys up to 60 unique materials, while traditional metal repairs require only a dozen or so, according to one study cited by the GAO report. In addition, technicians are less likely to repair a composite correctly, since the quality of repairs depends primarily on which process they use. The scale of knowledge and supplies that must be kept on hand is thus multiplied several times. Though there's a certain degree of standardization for the repair and maintenance of metals in aircraft, the same is not yet true for composites.

About the Author(s)

Ann R. Thryft

Ann R. Thryft has written about manufacturing- and electronics-related technologies for Design News, EE Times, Test & Measurement World, EDN, RTC Magazine, COTS Journal, Nikkei Electronics Asia, Computer Design, and Electronic Buyers' News (EBN). She's introduced readers to several emerging trends: industrial cybersecurity for operational technology, industrial-strength metals 3D printing, RFID, software-defined radio, early mobile phone architectures, open network server and switch/router architectures, and set-top box system design. At EBN Ann won two independently judged Editorial Excellence awards for Best Technology Feature. She holds a BA in Cultural Anthropology from Stanford University and a Certified Business Communicator certificate from the Business Marketing Association (formerly B/PAA).

Sign up for the Design News Daily newsletter.

You May Also Like