The Case of the Way-Too-Hot Power Supply Unit

Rob Spiegel

September 6, 2011

2 Min Read
The Case of the Way-Too-Hot Power Supply Unit

When I was design manager for C-MAC in Winnipeg, I won the first outsourced design from Avaya (nee Lucent). We had to redesign a power distribution rack for 16 VoIP (voice over Internet protocol) Lucent phones on T1 RJ45 ports. It was a simple design requirement that could have been written on a paper napkin.

a) Cut the size of the rack in half, from a 2U (rack unit) high to a 1U high 19" rack.
b) Select a 180W 48V DC for internal power distribution.
c) Make 10,000 units for half the price of existing 2U unit, or roughly $250 per rack.
d) Distribute 16x T1 (1.544Mbps) signals from two connectors to 16 VOIP RJ45 connections.
e) Pass Telco crosstalk, UL safety, and FCC requirements.
f) Deliver the first prototype in eight weeks.
g) Then ship 1,000 units a month after approval.

Simple, right?

Well, one of the UL requirements (that snuck in later) prevented the use of vertical cooling through the top lid, because UL had some special tests called the "Sledge Hammer" and "Spilled Coke" tests. It had to survive them without a safety issue of fire or sparks. Mind you, if one did both tests at the same time, the Coke might put out the fire.

So the internal open-framed PSU (power supply unit) needed extra insulation and cooling. No problem. Twin 25mm fans should do the trick. Buzz said the sheet metal at max RPM, and a 45 degrees C temperature rise said the thermocouple on the hot spot was not good enough.

So I decided on a goal of spending $2 for a design solution with my BOM (bill of materials) budget, product cost, and margins. That's all I wanted to spend to achieve a 15 degrees C temp rise above ambient for worst-case hot spots in the PSU.

But how? I already had laminar flow from one side to the other in the open frame PSU. It was a nice plenum shape to match the PSU "U frame" with adequate vent size, so I should get good CFM (cubic feet per minute). What's the deal?

So I looked for more powerful 25mm fans and considered axial and turbine types. Bearing types last longer in heat but are noisier, and the 1U rack design acted like a piano sounding board. Nothing seemed to improve it much. The conducted heat removal was as good as it was going to get.

About the Author

Rob Spiegel

Rob Spiegel serves as a senior editor for Design News. He started with Design News in 2002 as a freelancer covering sustainability issues, including the transistion in electronic components to RoHS compliance. Rob was hired by Design News as senior editor in 2011 to cover automation, manufacturing, 3D printing, robotics, AI, and more.

Prior to his work with Design News, Rob worked as a senior editor for Electronic News and Ecommerce Business. He served as contributing editolr to Automation World for eight years, and he has contributed to Supply Chain Management Review, Logistics Management, Ecommerce Times, and many other trade publications. He is the author of six books on small business and internet commerce, inclluding Net Strategy: Charting the Digital Course for Your Company's Growth.

He has been published in magazines that range from Rolling Stone to True Confessions.

Rob has won a number of awards for his technolloghy coverage, including a Maggy Award for a Design News article on the Jeep Cherokee hacking, and a Launch Team award for Ecommerce Business. Rob has also won awards for his leadership postions in the American Marketing Association and SouthWest Writers.

Before covering technology, Rob spent 10 years as publisher and owner of Chile Pepper Magazine, a national consumer food publication. He has published hundreds of poems and scores of short stories in national publications.

Sign up for the Design News Daily newsletter.

You May Also Like