Petroski on Engineering: Made in Japan

Henry Petroski

November 30, 2011

2 Min Read
Petroski on Engineering: Made in Japan

A Japanese reporter interviewed me recently for a story on stationery products. He told me that the Japanese love new and innovative writing implements -- things that many Americans consider commodities. He was talking about mechanical pencils, ballpoint pens, highlighters, and the like. Since I had written a history of the pencil, he wanted my take on some of the latest in Japanese writing products.

In anticipation of our appointment, he mailed me a few things that are hot items in Japan: a new kind of mechanical pencil, a popular ballpoint pen, and a pencil case package containing two other ballpoint pens and two highlighters. I agreed to try them in advance of the interview, so that I could respond to his questions about them.

The Uni-ball Kuru Toga (Japanese for "twist and turn") pencil came in a blister package with a cardboard insert that was printed in Japanese. However, I could tell from the pictures touting the pencil's innovative feature what distinguished it. The cartoons made it clear that, instead of the lead wearing down to a single inclined plane, it rotated automatically as it was used, and so it wore down in a conical form, thereby maintaining a sharper point. This was something I immediately appreciated. When I was learning mechanical drawing, I was taught to rotate my pencil as I dragged it along a T-square or triangle edge, so that the width of the line would remain nearly uniform. Rotating my wooden pencils as I write with them is a habit I have to this day.

I appreciated the ingenuity of the pencil with the automatically rotating lead, but I told my interviewer that it was a feature that might be more a marketing than a selling point in the US. After all, the thickness of the lead was 0.5mm, and in the course of writing, it hardly mattered how such a thin lead wore down. Furthermore, I told him, in order to achieve the feature of self-rotating lead, the pencil body had to have the thickness of a fountain pen. I was used to my pencils, whether mechanical or not, having a more slender look and feel.

I believe I may have disappointed him with my answer, but I went on to explain that all design involves compromise, and to fit the rotation mechanism into the implement's barrel, it had to be thicker than an ordinary pencil.

About the Author(s)

Henry Petroski

Henry Petroski is the Aleksandar S. Vesic Professor of Civil Engineering and a professor of history at Duke University. His most recent book is The Essential Engineer: Why Science Alone Will Not Solve Our Global Problems.

Sign up for the Design News Daily newsletter.

You May Also Like