Creating new semiconductor manufacturing facilities is the first step. But does it necessarily mean more jobs?

John Blyler

September 30, 2021

3 Min Read
JD73Y3_1540-800.jpg
Alamy

This year, the news has been flooded with the manufacturing challenges in the semiconductor space. The automotive industry has been particularly harsh in its criticism of chip shortages needed for their new vehicles. Whether this concern is warranted is open to debate, as automakers are being investigated for chip hoarding and their unwillingness to move to more contemporary chip designs that are not in short supply.

Regardless of the outcome, the U.S. semiconductor industry is going through significant changes to shift manufacturing back to American soil. For example, Samsung will soon be opening a new fab in Austin, TX, and Intel/TSMC has begun building a large fab in Arizona.

The Semiconductor Industry Association (SIA) and Oxford Economics reported recently that robust federal incentives for domestic chip manufacturing would create an average of nearly 200,000 American jobs annually as fabs are built and may add nearly $25 billion yearly to the U.S. economy.

Some see the building of new fabrication facilities in the U.S. as a short-term solution, which is being fueled by the White House’s proposal to invest $37 billion in the sector.

A longer-term solution would be for the federal government to increase demand for chips by buying more U.S.-made semiconductors or investing in industries that need them.

Related:Automotive Chip Shortages Only Part of the Problem

More Jobs?

Will all of these activities result in more U.S. manufacturing jobs? The Semiconductor Industry Association (SAI) certainly thinks so. A recent joint study between the SAI and the Boston Consulting Group concluded that $50 billion in federal incentives could help produce 70,000 direct jobs and up to 19 manufacturing facilities over the next ten years.

These facilities might lead to a total of 400,000 jobs within that same 10-year time frame, based on the industry group's analysis that every direct job in the sector creates nearly five additional jobs.

Other analysts urge caution, noting that the average leading-edge, lowest node fab can cost between $15-20 billion to build. Further, these modern fabs are increasingly fully automated. This could mean fewer jobs and more automated smart machines.

But building new fabs in the U.S. is only part of the challenge. Any domestic industry would also need talent and local resources, which typically require education and immigration reform. These considerations are nothing new to the semiconductor industry, wrestling with such challenges for many years.

As the SAI has noted, the semiconductor manufacturing process is not suited to rapid shifts in demand since it takes time to ramp up semiconductor production. Making a semiconductor is one of the most complex manufacturing processes. Lead times of up to 26 weeks are the norm in the industry to produce a finished chip. Most industry analysts believe the current short-term supply shortage will ease in the coming months as supply adjusts to meet demand.

Related:Electronic Supply Chains Sending Mixed Messages

John Blyler is a Design News senior editor, covering the electronics and advanced manufacturing spaces. With a BS in Engineering Physics and an MS in Electrical Engineering, he has years of hardware-software-network systems experience as an editor and engineer within the advanced manufacturing, IoT and semiconductor industries. John has co-authored books related to system engineering and electronics for IEEE, Wiley, and Elsevier.

About the Author(s)

John Blyler

John Blyler is a former Design News senior editor, covering the electronics and advanced manufacturing spaces. With a BS in Engineering Physics and an MS in Electrical Engineering, he has years of hardware-software-network systems experience as an engineer and editor within the advanced manufacturing, IoT and semiconductor industries. John has co-authored books related to RF design, system engineering and electronics for IEEE, Wiley, and Elsevier. John currently serves as a standard’s editor for Accellera-IEEE. He has been an affiliate professor at Portland State Univ and a lecturer at UC-Irvine.

Sign up for the Design News Daily newsletter.

You May Also Like