Design News is part of the Informa Markets Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

CAD Companies Spar Over Translations

CAD Companies Spar Over Translations

Autodesk has published a position paper casting doubt on the reliability of a new .dwg editor capability in the recently released SolidWorks 2005 software. The SolidWorks feature would enable AutoCAD users to maintain 2D legacy files while working in 3D, including working in SolidWorks.

All of this aims to try and fool AutoCAD users into thinking that this feature is a replacement for AutoCAD, the Autodesk paper says. Parries SoilidWorks Product Manager Robert McDonald: We had a lot of Autocad users test the .dwg editor and didn't get any reports of any significant problems.

Autodesk says the SolidWorks .dwg editor is a reverse-engineered technology developed through the Open Design Alliance consortium, and does not use any original Autodesk tools of software to correctly read or write .dwg files. There can be a time lag of as much as six months between the time when Autodesk customers can effectively collaborate with the latest version of .dwg and when users of other .dwg-based products can. Plus, the company says, there is a potential problem of fidelity of data that could lead to mistakes.

SolidWorks agrees on the time-lag issue, but says customers don't update regularly anyway. It also says the fidelity of data will be up to par.

Autodesk says SolidWorks' .dwg editor doesn't work well. SolidWorks says it does.
Hide comments


  • Allowed HTML tags: <em> <strong> <blockquote> <br> <p>

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.