Design News is part of the Informa Markets Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

3-D Printers versus 3-D Production Systems

3-D Printers versus 3-D Production Systems

Editor's Note: There have been dizzying changes in the field of rapid prototyping since the first systems were introduced in the 1980s. For starters, the field is now known as "additive manufacturing," referring to the process of making three-dimensional models layer by layer. These systems were originally intended for making prototypes quickly from a CAD file. Now, there are high-capability machines that make precision parts using the same technology. This paper submitted by Stratasys, a major manufacturer of both types of machines, provides guidelines for picking the right unit for your needs.

When planning to purchase an additive manufacturing system, buyers will find capabilities and a price range wider than products from most any industry. Systems can range from several hundred dollars for a hobbyist unit to nearly $1 million for some high-performance systems. It's no wonder there is confusion with respect to the product segments.

This paper addresses the capabilities, roles and positioning of systems geared for professional use. Beginning with the most basic information - the definition of 3-D printers - there are two product classes. While clarifying the "typical" roles and strengths of each, it also shows that there is overlap between the 3-D printers and their big brothers, sometimes referred to as 3-D production systems.

As additive manufacturing system prices have decreased, interest has swelled in owning a system to produce rapid prototypes, patterns, tooling and manufactured goods. Further fueling that interest is an increase in the number of technologies, systems and options available. Choice is the operative word, and those choices include entry-level systems priced below $15,000, as well as machines selling for more than $900,000.

With so many options, how do organizations know which is the best choice? How do they know what is a reasonable investment for an additive manufacturing system that will do their job right? To answer these questions, they begin with an understanding of the differences between 3-D printers and 3-D production systems. Knowing the distinctions between the two classes of systems allows informed decision-making that balances needs, wants and budget.

There are 10 general factors that distinguish 3-D printers from 3-D production systems. For some, the first factor, price, may be the only consideration. But for those with some flexibility in their capital equipment budgets, the other nine factors will guide the selection process. But this does not necessarily mean that more money will be spent. Many companies are pleasantly surprised to find that they can do all that they want with a low-price 3-D printer. Many others happily invest more in a 3-D production system that offers higher performance. And countless others invest in both - running 3-D printers and 3-D production systems side-by-side.

3-D Printers versus 3-D Production Systems

What are 3-D Printers and 3-D Production Systems?
Additive manufacturing systems were once called rapid prototyping machines and simply labeled as "low-end" or "high-end," and distinguished by price. When opting for a "low-end" machine, there was a big price to pay in quality or performance.

As the market and technologies matured, a new term, "3-D printers," sprang up. But instead of replacing "low-end" as a class descriptor, it became an over-used catch phrase that muddied the waters. To this day, there isn't universal agreement on the definition of 3-D printers. For some, the term covers all additive manufacturing technologies. However, the majority defines 3-D printers as compact, low price and easy to use. With this understanding, a 3-D printer is analogous to a desktop paper printer that is dedicated to one person or shared among a small team of co-workers.

Conversely, a 3-D production system is similar to a centralized copy center machine with higher output, more controls and which serves a whole office's needs. They are the "high-end" systems in 1990s lingo. In general, they offer more capability and higher performance with a larger price tag. Yet, the distinctions between the two classes are not that clear cut. To appreciate the subtle differences, consider the 10 distinguishing characteristics.

Keep in mind that these characteristics are general and typical, but there are exceptions.

10 Distinguishing Characteristics

1. Price:

  • 3-D printers: $10,000 to $50,000
  • 3-D production systems: $50,000 and above

The base price of machines is the simplest and most obvious differentiator between the two classes. In the additive manufacturing market, low price does not translate to low value. Value is determined by considering all the characteristics to find the system that can do the job while bringing the best return on investment.

2. Capacity / Build Envelope:
  • 3-D printer: normally less than 8 x 8 x 8 inch
  • 3-D production system: normally greater than 1 x 1 x 1 ft

The size of a machine's build envelope determines its capacity, typically both in terms of part size and total throughput. 3-D printers, which are designed more for office use or desktop operation, have smaller build envelopes suited for small- to mid-sized parts. These devices typically have build capacities that do not exceed 12 inches in any dimension. 3-D production systems, on the other hand, have the capacity to build parts that are measured in feet. In this class, two to three feet is a common measurement for the length, width or height of the build envelope.
3-D Printers versus 3-D Production Systems

Capacity is an important consideration because it is best to avoid building parts in pieces that have to be bonded together. Sectioning parts to fit in a build chamber adds time, labor and cost while decreasing quality. Also, running an additive manufacturing system multiple times to make one part decreases efficiency and machine availability.

To increase operational efficiency and total throughput, consider systems with the capacity to build many parts in a single run. As more parts are consolidated in each run, operational costs decrease while efficiencies rise. A bonus is that a lot of parts can be packed into a single run that is launched Friday night and left to run unattended over the weekend.

3. Materials:
  • 3-D printers: one or two
  • 3-D production systems: eight or more

Material properties play a role in every process selection. Whether the application is for a "down-and-dirty" concept model or a high-caliber production part, there will be some degree of consideration given to the materials that are available. In every case, the application needs a material that will perform well.

3-D printers typically do not offer broad material selections. Most give users a choice of just one or two general-purpose materials. In this class, the systems offer adequate, rather than exceptional, mechanical and thermal properties. In stark contrast, a strength of 3-D production systems is the number of materials offered and the breadth of properties available. 3-D production system users can specify a material that matches the specific needs of an application by selecting from a range of options that include specialized, highly engineered thermoplastics such as ULTEM(R) 9085.

In general, the material offerings of 3-D production systems make them better suited for functional testing, field testing, product trials, and creating manufacturing tools or finished goods. Each part in an assembly can be produced from a different material that is selected for the right combination of advanced material properties.
3-D Printers versus 3-D Production Systems

4. Speed:
  • 3-D printers: Not applicable
  • 3-D production systems: Not applicable

The speed of the additive manufacturing process is an important consideration, but it is not one that clearly distinguishes 3-D printers from 3-D production systems. In this area, bigger investments do not guarantee shorter build times. For example, there are 3-D printers that for one-tenth the price can build parts 10 times faster than some 3-D production systems. On the other hand, there are 3-D printers that take days to build what can be completed in hours with certain 3-D production systems.

For a manufacturer that offers both 3-D printers and 3-D production systems that do not share a common technology - there is no correlation between the speed of the process and the price tag. However, for a manufacturer with a technology that spans both classes, there is a direct link between speed and price.

If speed is measured in terms of throughput, 3-D production systems will again outpace 3-D printers. Combining build speed with capacity, the larger systems will, in general, deliver higher production rates on a weekly or monthly basis. This is an important point when faced with high-volume prototyping demands, and it is a critical factor when considering the technology to manufacture end products.

Note: Always evaluate the total process time for a technology. Build times alone are deceiving. So, include all time and labor needed on the front end to prepare a machine and on the back end to remove and finish the parts.

5. Ease-of-Use:
  • 3-D printers: Occasional User
  • 3-D production systems: Trained Operator

If a 3-D printer isn't easy to learn and easy to use, it should not be called a 3-D printer. Ease-of-use is imperative for these devices since they are intended to be used as a CAD-output tool. Occasional users are not skilled machine operators and cannot afford to spend days in training or hours preparing and operating a machine. From start to finish, the process must be simple, straightforward and effortless.

A vision shared by most 3-D printer manufacturers is to make their machines as transparent and unnoticed as the process of printing a document. Admittedly, these systems are not quite to this level, but some are close. From CAD output to finished parts, some are almost as labor-less as the process of printing a few dozen two-sided pages on a standard paper printer. In other words, it's not quite as simple as click-and- print, but it requires only a few extra steps and minimal thought.

To gain higher performance and greater functionality, 3-D production systems generally sacrifice ease-of-use. The advances in processes, materials and controls place additional demands on the user. To get the most out of 3-D production systems, there will be operators who are responsible for the oversight, maintenance and operation of the machines. These technicians will have undergone advanced training on the system and will continue to learn the subtle nuances of operations with each part that it produces. The technicians will also learn the unique processing requirements for each of the materials they use.

There is an exception, however. For the scalable technologies, like FDM, that are used in both 3-D printers and 3-D production systems, ease-of-use is possible in both classes. For everyday parts, the 3-D production system can be run as easily as a 3-D printer. However, when advanced capabilities are needed, someone other than a casual user may be called upon to leverage all that the system offers.

6. Operator Control:
  • 3-D printers: Minimal
  • 3-D production systems: Substantial

In return for ease-of-use, 3-D printers remove most of the operator control and user options. Instead of a computer screen filled with user-defined variables and selections, the casual user is presented with a limited number of pre-programmed routines and only a few options. And the choices must be applied globally to a part or across the entire job. In this way, 3-D printers are analogous to point-and-shoot cameras.

3-D production systems, on the other hand, are more like the sophisticated digital SLR cameras that have swappable lenses, variable flash settings, F-stop adjustments and ISO settings. 3-D production systems, like their camera counterparts, give operators control of a multitude of variables to fine-tune part quality, adjust part characteristics and influence production rates. Unlike their 3-D printer counterparts, the most advanced systems in this class allow the user to apply many control parameters at the feature level of the part. For example, to save time and material, the machine can make an ornamental feature hollow and a functional feature solid. This level of control, combined with material selection, is why 3-D production systems are the likely candidates for advanced applications in prototype development and manufacturing.

7. Accuracy:
  • 3-D printers: Acceptable to Good
  • 3-D production systems: Good to Excellent

"Geometry dependent" is the qualifier on any statement of dimensional accuracy and repeatability for additive manufacturing systems in both technology classes. Yet, it is safe to assume that in the case of accuracy and repeatability, buyers will get their money's worth. Overall, 3-D production systems are more accurate and offer greater repeatability than their lower price 3-D printer siblings.

This is not to say that 3-D printers cannot make parts with reasonable dimensional accuracy. They can. There is just less emphasis on this attribute and less user influence over it. 3-D printers are designed to be simple, cost-effective machines targeted for early models and prototypes where looser tolerances are acceptable. With this target in mind, 3-D printer manufacturers place less priority on accuracy. And as noted previously, the simplified user interface removes the option of fine-tuning to dial in parts for better quality.

With higher expectations of part quality, the manufacturers of 3-D production systems are investing in high-grade components, tight process controls and precise calibration. No longer just for prototyping, the best 3-D production systems are designed and manufactured as if they were any other machine on the manufacturing floor. Tight and repeatable tolerance is a reasonable expectation when investing in this class of additive manufacturing technology.

Although the quality differences may be difficult to see with the naked eye, they will show up when parts are scrutinized by quality control. It will also become apparent when seeking confirmation of a machine's accuracy capabilities. For 3-D printers, there are general tolerance claims but no exhaustive studies that qualify accuracy and repeatability. For 3-D production systems, it is reasonable to expect a study that is thorough, rigorous and statistically sound. Without this level of data, buyers would find it difficult to trust that a 3-D production system could actually be used for production.

8. Facilities:
  • 3-D printers: Office-like Environment
  • 3-D production systems: Lab or Shop Environment

The allure of 3-D printing has been the vision of producing models and prototypes where the design and engineering work is being done. To make this vision a reality, the 3-D printing process must be clean, quiet, cool and odorless. Requiring no more than a wall outlet and network connection, the 3-D printing process becomes an in-office output device. Major advances toward this goal have been made in recent years.

Although the vision for 3-D printers is not quite a reality, there are several units on the market that fit nicely in an office environment. But even the most office-friendly 3-D printer will likely have a separate workspace in a nearby room for part finishing. Access to a water supply and drain; well-lit and roomy work surfaces; and supply storage areas are conveniences that are likely to be located outside of the engineering offices.

3-D production systems, for the most part, are located in workshops and labs or placed on the manufacturing floor. These machines are big and bulky, not something that most want in their offices. They often have shop-oriented requirements for power, compressed gas, temperature control, humidity control, vibration dampening or debris containment. For most 3-D production systems, the projects often dictate that the parts go through secondary operations that may employ a variety of shop tools and supplies. This work must be kept in the shop. The added facility requirements for 3-D production systems will have an effect on the initial system investment and ongoing operating expenses.

9. Centralized Operations:
  • 3-D printers: Distributed
  • 3-D production systems: Centralized

Additive manufacturing offers two modes of operation: centralized and distributed. Companies may choose to distribute machines throughout the organization or centralize them in one area that is managed by a dedicated staff. Some want the flexibility and independence that a distributed network of systems offers. Others prefer the control, oversight and efficiencies of a centralized grouping of systems.

The distributed network is the domain of 3-D printers. In this operating mode, designers and engineers have direct access to their prototyping tools. Instead of sending jobs off to be scheduled and built, the engineering team gains the independence and control that comes from deciding its own priorities and making its own parts.

In a centralized operation, the shop staff receives all part requests, schedules production, manages runs, and oversees post processing. This department takes on the work of making models and parts for the whole organization. With responsibilities to maximize efficiencies, minimize cost, and maximize responsiveness, the build schedule has priorities beyond the urgent need for a single part. So, a rush job may be bumped to a later time because there are other rush jobs already in queue.

10. Overhead:
  • 3-D printers: Minimal
  • 3-D production systems: Moderate to High

Distributed, self-serve operations do not place additional overhead burdens on an organization. The staffing remains the same since those who need the parts are those who build and finish them.

Centralized operations require someone to manage day-to-day operations, including the production schedule. When applying the 3-D production systems to advanced applications, such as tooling and finished goods production, there will be additional demands for skilled technicians that can leverage the controls that these systems offer. Finally, depending on the complexity of the system, there may be a need for someone to perform post processing, part finishing, and secondary operations.

As the application progresses from simple concept models to advanced manufacturing, more is expected from the additive manufacturing systems and more is needed from the team that tends to their operations.

Subtle Differences

With additive manufacturing, organizations can get a lot of capability affordably. Being less expensive does not mean that a 3-D printer is an inferior solution to a 3-D production system. It is simply a different solution. Using the 10 differentiating factors, a solution may be found to best match the organization's needs, budgets, and operating style.

Choosing between 3-D printers and 3-D productions systems is not like picking a two-wheel scooter or an 18-wheel big rig. It is more like picking from a selection of compact cars, luxury sedans, SUVs and pickup trucks. The application will drive the decision. And continuing with this analogy, ultimately companies will find the need to have one for commuting and another for towing the pleasure boat, which is to say that they may find themselves running both 3-D printers and 3-D production systems.

TAGS: Materials
Hide comments


  • Allowed HTML tags: <em> <strong> <blockquote> <br> <p>

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.