The Tesla Fires Are Fixable

By now, most followers of the electric car market know that another Tesla Model S caught fire in early February. The blaze happened in a homeowner’s garage in Toronto. After parking the car, the owner left his garage. Moments later, the smoke detector blared, the fire department was called, and the car was ruined. To date, no one knows why.

Charles Murray

February 21, 2014

3 Min Read
The Tesla Fires Are Fixable

By now, most followers of the electric car market know that another Tesla Model S caught fire in early February. The blaze happened in a homeowner’s garage in Toronto. After parking the car, the owner left his garage. Moments later, the smoke detector blared, the fire department was called, and the car was ruined. To date, no one knows why.

Within days, though, three predictable things happened: Media outlets reported the story, electric car proponents complained about the coverage, and electric car non-believers cited the fire as one more reason why EVs are doomed.

None of that surprises anyone, of course. The same news-anger-doom cycle has been repeating itself for about two years, every time an electric car catches fire.

Maybe it’s time to get a grip. For some it may be hard to believe, but the decision to cover or not cover an electric car fire isn’t typically an emotional one. It’s a tough choice. EV technology is still new to a degree. An unknown to many, it's costly, current, and under study by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA).

Truth be told, EV proponents are just as interested in this subject as the detractors. If you don’t believe that, look at the Tesla Motors online forums. Commenters there, most of whom are true believers, are buzzing about the latest Model S fire. They too want to know what happened.

At some point we’ll all find out. NHTSA might decide that the Model S needs a thicker armor plate, a different cooling system, some other kind of design tweak.

But if there is a change, it will be a tweak. It won’t be a huge fix. Nor will it be a sign that EV batteries are inherently unsafe. Remember, gasoline is far more energetic than lithium-ion chemistry, as is jet fuel. Yet every day, engineers successfully design safe cars that burn gasoline. They design safe planes that burn jet fuel. They design safe machines that burn coal, hydrogen, and even uranium. In all cases, they take a package of energy, figure out how to use it in a productive way, and then build in safeguards.

There’s no reason they can’t do the same with electric car batteries. Maybe the safeguards need to be strengthened. Doing so may add cost, but it can be done, easily.

To be sure, pure electric cars face challenges ahead. Battery energy density is still low and cost is high. Those are real problems. But the miniscule number of battery fires that have occurred to date shouldn’t cause an issue. The news coverage can and should continue, but the anger and doom need to be ratcheted down a few notches.

Engineers will fix this problem. That’s what engineers do.

Related posts:

  • {doclink 271549}

  • {doclink 270926}

  • {doclink 270380}

  • {doclink 270331}

  • {doclink 270295}

  • {doclink 270173}

  • {doclink 269821}

  • {doclink 269396}

  • {doclink 269077}

  • {doclink 268739}

  • {doclink 268557}

  • {doclink 268473}

  • {doclink 268362}

  • {doclink 268127}

  • {doclink 267926}

  • {doclink 267878}

  • {doclink 267833}

  • {doclink 267339}

  • {doclink 267317}

  • {doclink 266142}

  • {doclink 266450}

  • {doclink 266188}

  • {doclink 266061}

  • {doclink 265790}

  • {doclink 265529}

  • {doclink 265157}

  • {doclink 264712}

  • {doclink 263072}

  • {doclink 261927}

  • {doclink 261782}

  • {doclink 261236}

  • {doclink 260529}

  • {doclink 259550}

  • {doclink 258495}

  • {doclink 258113}

  • {doclink 257628}

  • {doclink 256966}

  • {doclink 255754}

  • {doclink 255564}

  • {doclink 255380}

  • {doclink 255191}

  • {doclink 255091}

  • {doclink 254150}

  • {doclink 252881}

  • {doclink 251534}

  • {doclink 251483}

  • {doclink 250517}

  • {doclink 250256}

  • {doclink 249928}

  • {doclink 249519}

  • {doclink 248442}

  • {doclink 246722}

  • {doclink 246644}

  • {doclink 245676}

  • {doclink 245442}

  • {doclink 244906}

  • {doclink 244832}

  • {doclink 244669}

  • {doclink 242498}

  • {doclink 242424}

  • {doclink 242108}

  • {doclink 241552}

  • {doclink 241175}

  • {doclink 240962}

  • {doclink 240363}

  • {doclink 240303}

  • {doclink 239766}

  • {doclink 238863}

  • {doclink 237768}

  • {doclink 237698}

  • {doclink 237534}

  • {doclink 237329}

  • {doclink 237015}

  • {doclink 236557}

  • {doclink 235252}

  • {doclink 235241}

  • {doclink 235140}

  • {doclink 234687}

  • {doclink 234367}

  • {doclink 234251}

  • {doclink 233282}

  • {doclink 233004}

  • {doclink 229120}

  • {doclink 228520}

About the Author(s)

Charles Murray

Charles Murray is a former Design News editor and author of the book, Long Hard Road: The Lithium-Ion Battery and the Electric Car, published by Purdue University Press. He previously served as a DN editor from 1987 to 2000, then returned to the magazine as a senior editor in 2005. A former editor with Semiconductor International and later with EE Times, he has followed the auto industry’s adoption of electric vehicle technology since 1988 and has written extensively about embedded processing and medical electronics. He was a winner of the Jesse H. Neal Award for his story, “The Making of a Medical Miracle,” about implantable defibrillators. He is also the author of the book, The Supermen: The Story of Seymour Cray and the Technical Wizards Behind the Supercomputer, published by John Wiley & Sons in 1997. Murray’s electronics coverage has frequently appeared in the Chicago Tribune and in Popular Science. He holds a BS in engineering from the University of Illinois at Chicago.

Sign up for the Design News Daily newsletter.

You May Also Like