HOME  |  NEWS  |  BLOGS  |  MESSAGES  |  FEATURES  |  VIDEOS  |  WEBINARS  |  INDUSTRIES  |  FOCUS ON FUNDAMENTALS
  |  REGISTER  |  LOGIN  |  HELP
Page 1/5  >  >>
Mydesign
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Power for carrying High loads
Mydesign   7/22/2014 11:35:08 PM
NO RATINGS
1 saves
Patb2009, thanks for the link and details.

patb2009
User Rank
Gold
Re: Power for carrying High loads
patb2009   7/16/2014 1:29:07 AM
NO RATINGS
apparently in 1974, UPS ran a small demo fleet of Electric converted jeeps.

 

https://about.usps.com/who-we-are/postal-history/electric-vehicles.pdf

 

Had they stuck that out, they'd be saving a couple billion a year.

 

 

Mydesign
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Power for carrying High loads
Mydesign   7/16/2014 12:36:47 AM
NO RATINGS
1 saves
"Battery was more then adequate and the short range  was ideal for a return every night to charge."

Patb2009, if required on the way it can get charged through various charging stations too.

Mydesign
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Power for carrying High loads
Mydesign   7/16/2014 12:34:51 AM
NO RATINGS
1 saves
"That's why i don't understand why it didn't happen to the USPS in the 70's. Battery was more then adequate and the short range  was ideal for a return every night to charge."

Patb2009, what is this USPS story in 1970?

patb2009
User Rank
Gold
Re: Power for carrying High loads
patb2009   7/11/2014 6:44:23 PM
NO RATINGS
That's why i don't understand why it didn't happen to the USPS in the 70's.

Battery was more then adequate and the short range  was 

ideal for a return every night to charge.

Mydesign
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Power for carrying High loads
Mydesign   7/11/2014 2:16:08 AM
NO RATINGS
1 saves
"For any trip under 30 miles roundtrip, electric is significantly better. What I don't understand is why the USPS never switched their whole fleet to electrics back in the 70's."

Patb2009, it's all depends up on the battery power and availability of charging points on the way.

patb2009
User Rank
Gold
Re: Power for carrying High loads
patb2009   7/7/2014 1:43:35 PM
NO RATINGS
It's not good, it's better, significantly better.

For any trip under 30 miles roundtrip, electric is significantly better.

What I don't understand is why the USPS never switched their whole fleet to

electrics back in the 70's.

 

The average mail truck goes 13 miles round trip, the average speed is only some 4 MPH, and the peak speed is only about 35 MPH,  There is almost zero requirement for highway speed  and these are operated from a fixed base by a bunch of procedure oriented, operational bureaucrats.  By going to EV the fleet maintenance becomes much simpler, and

given the short ranges you don't really need complex charging systems, just run 48 V DC out to the slots,  and a simple charge monitoring circuit to keep the batteries from cooking.

 

You have time during lunch to top off, and you have all night to slow charge, this is ideal.

 

 

Mydesign
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Power for carrying High loads
Mydesign   7/7/2014 5:22:40 AM
NO RATINGS
1 saves
"The brits have a half a century experience with electric milk floats. For anything with short range and low speed, they should all be changing to electrics."

Patb2009, you are right. its good in delivering low volume/weight to a short distance.

patb2009
User Rank
Gold
Re: Power for carrying High loads
patb2009   7/4/2014 1:59:53 PM
NO RATINGS
The brits have a half a century experience with electric milk floats.

For anything with short range and low speed, they should all be changing to electrics.

Mydesign
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Power for carrying High loads
Mydesign   7/4/2014 3:20:10 AM
NO RATINGS
1 saves
"FEDEX residential uses smaller trucks rather then the big Panel trucks. These would be ideal for Postal workers.  I actually don't know why the USPS didn't already convert their entire fleet to electrics. The average USPS delivery route is 13 miles, the vehicles return to the post office twice/day, the post office is an ideal bureaucratic fleet manager. Given the very low speed of the USPS fleet, you can use cheap motors and lead acid batteries."

Patb2009, it's a good option for mail and courier/parcel delivery. Since fuel costs are less, cost effective too.

Page 1/5  >  >>


Partner Zone
Latest Analysis
Engineers at Fuel Cell Energy have found a way to take advantage of a side reaction, unique to their carbonate fuel cell that has nothing to do with energy production, as a potential, cost-effective solution to capturing carbon from fossil fuel power plants.
To get to a trillion sensors in the IoT that we all look forward to, there are many challenges to commercialization that still remain, including interoperability, the lack of standards, and the issue of security, to name a few.
Researchers in The Netherlands are testing highway sound barriers that have a two-fold purpose: to block sound and also to harvest solar energy.
This is part one of an article discussing the University of Washington’s nationally ranked FSAE electric car (eCar) and combustible car (cCar). Stay tuned for part two, tomorrow, which will discuss the four unique PCBs used in both the eCar and cCars.
Today, no matter where in the world the device is located, it can call home and ask for the latest-and-greatest firmware with bug fixes and feature updates.
More:Blogs|News
Quick Poll
The Continuing Education Center offers engineers an entirely new way to get the education they need to formulate next-generation solutions.
Jul 6 - 10, Building Raspberry Pi Controllers with Python
SEMESTERS: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6 |  7


Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.
Learn More   |   Login   |   Archived Classes
Twitter Feed
Design News Twitter Feed
Like Us on Facebook

Sponsored Content

Technology Marketplace

Copyright © 2015 UBM Canon, A UBM company, All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service