If you follow the link and read the paper about this bill this is what you get.
How? By doing more with less, meeting people's need for heat, cold, light, and electronics while using less energy. The measures in Shaheen-Portman include provisions to:
Help states improve their building energy codes and implement them more effectively;
Consider the energy efficiency of homes when underwriting mortgages to recognize that families that pay lower energy bills can afford a slightly higher mortgage payment;
Strengthen federal assistance to industry to improve competitiveness by making plants more efficient; and
Other provisions, including on public energy use information for commercial buildings and on efficiency in federal data centers, schools, and more.
So basically it more of our money to creat more programs and more force to make the people do what theny think we should. On top of that putting our money into creating these programs they then expect us to put in more money to actually carry out these efforts.
How does anybody support more of this bable. If a company will be improved competitvely by makeing effeciency changes then let them decide and do it (which if the Co wants to grow and stay they will) We do not need big brother telling us what to do.
On the jobs created you have to ask were the money is going to come from for these jobs. Everyone always forgets if you spend money here (on improvng energy effeciency) then you are not spending it on spmething else that would create other jobs often times more jobs. Again please let people use their common sense to decide were their own money is best suited to go more often than not they will make far bettery decisions than 15 goverment minders and programs could do.
The question is what type of jobs? Are these more government jobs? We do not need more government jobs. The taxpayers can't afford to pay for more government workers. How is Congress forcing the creation of jobs a good thing? Nope. Let the market work.
Anytime you start an article with "Congress" anything after that is lost. These clowns cannot even agree to disagree! And it usually means that I have to pay more so some big business can pedal the latest green initiative!
Engineers at Fuel Cell Energy have found a way to take advantage of a side reaction, unique to their carbonate fuel cell that has nothing to do with energy production, as a potential, cost-effective solution to capturing carbon from fossil fuel power plants.
To get to a trillion sensors in the IoT that we all look forward to, there are many challenges to commercialization that still remain, including interoperability, the lack of standards, and the issue of security, to name a few.
This is part one of an article discussing the University of Washington’s nationally ranked FSAE electric car (eCar) and combustible car (cCar). Stay tuned for part two, tomorrow, which will discuss the four unique PCBs used in both the eCar and cCars.
Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.