100 microns X 100 microns X 5 microns??? Yikes! I realize this isn't a traditional IC engine, but the size is still mind-boggling. A few years agom, we wrote about the Conley Stinger engine, which had a 0.9-inch stroke. I thought that was small.
I also wonedr about the efficiency, and in addition, why anyone would consider salt water to be a fuel, since by definition a fuel delivers energy by a chemical reation, and is converted into a substance with less chemical potential energy. So if the salt water is recovered at the end of a cycle it did not release any chemical energy. So it could be called a working fluid but it should not be called a fuel. The input power is the electricity used to electrolyse the saltwater into whatever is produced and then re-combined. So really the invention is an electric motor, not a fuel consuming engine.
And one more question is about how useful work would be captured from this device, and would it still function if work were taken out.
I agree, but would suggest that it be labeled with the common term "electric motor" since it is in fact turning electric energy into mechanical motion. I guess that term wouldn't have as much success in gaining PR, though.
If I recall my ancient electrochemical knowledge correctly, electrolysis of saltwater does NOT yield hydrogen and oxygen, but rather sodium hydroxide (lye) and gaseous chlorine. This is the basis of the entire chloralkalai industry! I'm not surprised they haven't figured out what really happens inside this tiny device, since they don't seem to understand this very basic (grade-school science in my day) fact.
This does not seem to be an internal combustion engine in the usually-accepted sense. Rather, it appears to be an electric engine (since that's the only fuel consumed) in which it is conjectured that the working fluid, after disassociating, spontaneously combusts. It doesn't seem to me that heat or heat efficiency enters into it at all. It's an interesting little motor but not an internal combustion engine.
A slew of announcements about new materials and design concepts for transportation have come out of several trade shows focusing on plastics, aircraft interiors, heavy trucks, and automotive engineering. A few more announcements have come independent of any trade shows, maybe just because it's spring.
Samsung's Galaxy line of smartphones used to fare quite well in the repairability department, but last year's flagship S5 model took a tumble, scoring a meh-inducing 5/10. Will the newly redesigned S6 lead us back into star-studded territory, or will we sink further into the depths of a repairability black hole?
Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.