HOME  |  NEWS  |  BLOGS  |  MESSAGES  |  FEATURES  |  VIDEOS  |  WEBINARS  |  INDUSTRIES  |  FOCUS ON FUNDAMENTALS
  |  REGISTER  |  LOGIN  |  HELP
Page 1/2  >  >>
Battar
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Retrofit
Battar   3/18/2014 5:00:09 AM
NO RATINGS
Charles, there is a 20$ heating element in the storage tank for use on rainy days.

Just google solar water heater and you will see the setup.

Elizabeth M
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Retrofit
Elizabeth M   3/18/2014 4:45:34 AM
NO RATINGS
That is an excellent point, fm! It seems that people who want to use renewables or companies/engineers offering new renewable-energy solutions always have to justify the technology. But as you point out, that isn't true for every project or technology that's been devised in the past, and in some cases it should be. I appreciate your comment and hope it gets people thinking.

Elizabeth M
User Rank
Blogger
Re: More Details Please
Elizabeth M   3/18/2014 4:38:05 AM
NO RATINGS
Hi, Zippy, thanks for your comment and I'm aware of the typo in the name of the university and city. Hopefully that will be fixed, and sorry about that!

I think the project website has a lot more details than the article about the project. Hopefully that can give you the information you're looking for.

Charles Murray
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Retrofit
Charles Murray   3/17/2014 5:31:54 PM
NO RATINGS
Battar, do you need batteries for that set-up? If so, what kind? Are they expensive?

fm
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Retrofit
fm   3/17/2014 1:06:10 PM
NO RATINGS
Personally, i find it interesting that whenever renewables are discussed, the biggest word in the room is "payback." That term is pretty rare in other circles. Does anyone ever discuss the "payback" in complete terms when flattening a city block to reconstruct better buildings in the same spot?

Really, the additional cost of the "skin" in this case should be compared not to its direct "payback," (the cost of the skin vs the energy cost saved) but to the cost of razing and reconstructing these buildings with modern passive and active energy management solutions. I'm guessing that this could be an economical solution in certain situations.

Clever and innovative!

Battar
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Retrofit
Battar   3/17/2014 10:42:25 AM
NO RATINGS
Greg,

       Electricity at $0.18 KW/H, water heater 2.5KW in use 2 hours a day, solar energy alternative 270 days/year (I said efficient), ROI after 3.5 years, solar heater lifetime 8 years at least. Thats assuming 5 showers daily (3 grubby little boys) + washing up with hot water.

Of course, if it's just the 2 of you the calculations are different.

Greg M. Jung
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Retrofit
Greg M. Jung   3/17/2014 10:13:06 AM
NO RATINGS
Battar, can you please advise for the $800 investment, how fast was your payback based upon the actual savings that you realized?  (less than 2 years?).

Zippy
User Rank
Platinum
Re: More Details Please
Zippy   3/17/2014 9:32:23 AM
NO RATINGS
The site mentions additional insulation for the "cold" side of the house, which is in some way adjustable.  That would be interesting to learn about as well.

 

By the way, the "t" was omitted from Delft in several places, which is the name of the university and the city.

Battar
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Retrofit
Battar   3/17/2014 9:21:28 AM
NO RATINGS
I have a solar water heater on my roof. Everyone in my neighborhood has one. They are cheap (about 800$), simple, and amazingly efficient. The will to invest a little to save energy in many parts of the world just doesn't seem to be in place yet.

Elizabeth M
User Rank
Blogger
Re: More Details Please
Elizabeth M   3/17/2014 5:43:02 AM
NO RATINGS
I think there is a lot of information on the project site, Daniyal, but I am sure more will be revealed at the competition. At this point I don't think I can go, but if I do I will be sure to reveal more details and report more on innovative projects like this.

Page 1/2  >  >>


Partner Zone
Latest Analysis
Former DARPA official and Google executive Dr. Kaigham Gabriel believes sensor companies think too much like suppliers and need to bring their products closer to the consumer.
One way to keep a Formula One racing team moving at breakneck speed in the pit and at the test facility is to bring CAD drawings of the racing vehicleís parts down to the test facility and even out to the track.
Most of us would just as soon step on a cockroach rather than study it, but thatís just what researchers at UC Berkeley did in the pursuit of building small, nimble robots suitable for disaster-recovery and search-and-rescue missions.
Engineers at Festo were inspired by how a caterpillar builds its cocoon when designing its new 3D Cocooner printer.
Design engineers need to prepare for a future in which their electronic products will use not just one or two, but possibly many user interfaces that involve touch, vision, gestures, and even eye movements.
More:Blogs|News
Quick Poll
The Continuing Education Center offers engineers an entirely new way to get the education they need to formulate next-generation solutions.
SEMESTERS: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6 |  7 | 8 | 9


Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.
Next Course June 28-30:
Sponsored by Proto Labs
Learn More   |   Login   |   Archived Classes
Twitter Feed
Design News Twitter Feed
Like Us on Facebook

Technology Marketplace

Copyright © 2016 UBM Canon, A UBM company, All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service