Thanks for the feedback everyone and glad you enjoyed the article! Regarding the question from User 78RPM- In mutual capacitance you scan all of the 'pixels' (or nodes in industry parlance) and convert capacitive measurements into digital. These are all stored in memory so you can make decisions in firmware as to which nodes represent fingers touching the screen. You can almost think of it as a topographical or 3D contour map of the screen with the X and Y axes representing position and the 'Z height' representing the capacitive signal. So the tallest peaks on the map represent likely finger locations. Of course you get complexities introduced from water droplets, palms resting on the screen, or hovering fingers that you want to report as hovering objects rather than touches, and so on. All of these need good algorithmic techniques to effectively reject them
In self capacitance you take of all these same capacitive measurements in each X and Y axis and you have a profile or a single measurement per trace. You can think of it as a bar chart with the height of each bar symbolizing the capacitive measurement. And the number of bars is the total of number of X and Y traces. You can then use a center of mass style calculation (or similar algorithm) that computes the X-position and Y-position of the finger. As you can see you're looking at each axis independently so you don't have a datapoint per node as you do in mutual capacitance but as the article illustrates there are benefits from self capacitance for power consumption, moisture immunity and first touch latency.
To answer your other question a single broken trace will cause a dead spot along that particular trace where the touchscreen will become unresponsive. The further along the trace (i.e.- farther from the routing channel and closer to the end of the trace) that break is located, the smaller the dead zone will be. If the trace breaks right where it routes into the touchscreen from the bezel edge then effectively the entire trace will become a deadzone. The remaining part of the touchscreen will be usable though.
Help me understand, Shar or taimoortariq or anyone else. I had always thought that all the capacitance pixels of a phone or tablet were mapped to memory addresses. The article is telling me that there are only two circuits; the X and Y axes. Then there is some kind of capacitance profile that identifies the spot that is touched. What is that algorithm or neural network like?
A secondary question: Is it possible that a single break in either the X or Y axis could cause a single point of failure for the whole device?
What should be the perception of a product’s real-world performance with regard to the published spec sheet? While it is easy to assume that the product will operate according to spec, what variables should be considered, and is that a designer obligation or a customer responsibility? Or both?
Biomimicry has already found its way into the development of robots and new materials, with researchers studying animals and nature to come up with new innovations. Now thanks to researchers in Boston, biomimicry could even inform the future of electrical networks for next-generation displays.
Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.