HOME  |  NEWS  |  BLOGS  |  MESSAGES  |  FEATURES  |  VIDEOS  |  WEBINARS  |  INDUSTRIES  |  FOCUS ON FUNDAMENTALS
  |  REGISTER  |  LOGIN  |  HELP
<<  <  Page 3/5  >  >>
Al Klu
User Rank
Gold
Re: Solar energy generator
Al Klu   3/18/2014 9:01:57 AM
NO RATINGS
I appreciate your input.  Can you give me some specifics? 

What state are you in? How big a system did you put on?  How much did it cost?  How much of your subsidy was federal and how much was from the state?

How effective is your system?  What was your electric bill before and after installation? If you don't want to share that, what is your average usage in Kwh before and after installation? (i.e. how much electricity have you produced?).

This will tell us your payback.

How about maintenance?  Do you have to go up on the roof and wash off the panels?  Do you have snow?  Have you thought about what's going to happen when you have to reshingle your roof?

Thank you. 

Mydesign
User Rank
Platinum
Solar energy generator
Mydesign   3/18/2014 6:31:17 AM
NO RATINGS
1 saves
Al Klu, two year back I had installed PV and solar energy generating system over my roof and I got 60 % subsidy from local government. Moreover, they have the buyback policy for the excess generated energy to grid.

Al Klu
User Rank
Gold
Re: Solar Cell Efficiency...
Al Klu   3/12/2014 10:58:15 AM
NO RATINGS
I would love to put solar panels on my roof here in Connecticut. We have a perfect, unobstructed, south facing roof.  However, even with all the government subsidies, our payback is targeted for about 15 years (optomistic sales pitch, the reality is that it would be much longer).  After this time, I would expect the equipment to start needing repairs, or even replacement, which basically says that we are not saving anything.  A big hidden expense will show up when we need to re-shingle our roof (about 5 to 10 years from now).  They would have to come out, take off the panels and supports, then put them back on after the roof is shingled.  This quoted cost is about $2000 dollars - wiping out any savings from the panels.

There are a few companies that are popping up that will put the panels on for "free", but basically, we would be paying near normal rates (no savings), for them to make money on our roof.  And we would still need to pay the $2000 for the re-shingling of our roof.

I would take the plunge if the payback was 5 years or less.  That would need a few more incremental steps in cost reductions.  I don't know why you think individuals in Middle Class America have more money for this huge investment than our government.  I certainly can't "opt" to purchase PV outright at the present time. 

And you are asking the Government to just "give away" money (that's what subsidies, grants, and tax rebates are really doing) with no return on investment.  My way, at least the government power bill will be reduced - hopefully by the amount of the investment.

Mydesign
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Solar Cell Efficiency...
Mydesign   3/3/2014 6:35:49 AM
NO RATINGS
1 saves
"You and I are saying the exact same thing, except I am proposing that the government help make the technology popular.  You are waiting for "someone else" to make it popular first. "

Al Klu, would you think government will invest for it, I won't think because it requires huge investment. I feel the best way is government or local states can offer subsidies for citizens, who are opting for outright purchase of solar PV cells and other components.  

Al Klu
User Rank
Gold
Re: Solar Cell Efficiency...
Al Klu   2/21/2014 3:51:07 PM
NO RATINGS
The chicken and egg thing again. You and I are saying the exact same thing, except I am proposing that the government help make the technology popular.  You are waiting for "someone else" to make it popular first. 

If the government is procuring solar panels, and putting them on roofs of local government buildings (schools, town halls, courthouses, military complexes), the image of solar panels in use becomes widespread and therefore more popular.  As the general public sees this technology as common, and hopefully effective, they are more likely to participate by buying into solar.

If you see solar panels everywhere, wouldn't you be more likely to buy some for your own home?  As more people buy solar, there is more money going into the businesses, inlcuding manufacturers, and there will be more competition.

A precedent for this process is the entire space program, especially in the 60's.  How many new products and product improvements came from the government sponsored space program?  My company was one of the very first companies to develop the electron beam welding process for industry.  And this was because the government purchased space equipment that needed the EB weld technology.

Mydesign
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Solar Cell Efficiency...
Mydesign   2/21/2014 4:44:01 AM
NO RATINGS
1 saves
"As the design and manufacturing processes improve, costs will go down.  This is exactly why the government should be putting its money where its mouth is.  In other words, the governments should be buying solar for government buildings, miltary bases, etc. "

Al Klu, cost will comes downs only when technology becomes popular and competition happens with in the manufacturer.

Al Klu
User Rank
Gold
Re: Solar Cell Efficiency...
Al Klu   2/19/2014 12:41:02 PM
NO RATINGS
Good Post.  As the design and manufacturing processes improve, costs will go down.  This is exactly why the government should be putting its money where its mouth is.  In other words, the governments should be buying solar for government buildings, miltary bases, etc. 

It was not right to just "loan" Solyndra $500M, but it is right to buy $500M of solar panels.  It will help develop the industry to spend $500M on solar product (better be made in America) than it would be to buy aircraft and tanks that many times those folks don't even want.

The point is to buy different technologies and see which ones work best. 

Finally, in addition to improving this industry, there is payback in lower electric bills across the board.

Mydesign
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Solar Cell Efficiency...
Mydesign   2/4/2014 1:44:34 AM
NO RATINGS
1 saves
"I have continued to watch the prices of solar panels and other equipment and have seen them decline significantly.  A system like mine could be built now for at less than half of what I paid for it."

Greener, pricing is a fact in technology domain. When day goes, prices may get slashed and moreover new technology with better efficiency also may get introduced to markets.

greenewr
User Rank
Silver
Re: Solar Cell Efficiency...
greenewr   2/3/2014 10:01:51 AM
NO RATINGS
When the system was installed, Mssachusetts had a generous Solar Renewable Engergy credit (SREC).  For every Megawatt-hour the system produced an SREC was issued.  These credits were to be purchased by the power generation companies to compiy with renewable energy sourcing targets.  This was supposed to create a demand for independtly generated SRECs.  It worked for the first year and for each credit I recieved ~$500.  I think I had 3 credits that were purchased at this price.  Unfortunately, far more people/companies also saw this as a good thing and built quite a lot of solar capacity in the following year.  This produced an oversupply of SRECs and the price was significantly depressed (~$235/SREC).  Massachusetts is no longer allowing new installations under this system in order to stabilize SREC pricing.

The original calculations for payback showed something like 6 years for ROI.  The SREC pricing has significantly disrupted this.  I have a low interest loan on the installation (2.75%) and use the not isignificant electric bill savings to pay it down, along with the SREC sales proceeds.

I have continued to watch the prices of solar panels and other equipment and have seen them decline significantly.  A system like mine could be built now for at less than half of what I paid for it.

I've learned a lot about how it should have been done, to make operational issues easier, but I have no regrets.

 

Mydesign
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Solar Cell Efficiency...
Mydesign   2/3/2014 6:13:15 AM
NO RATINGS
1 saves
Greener, you mean that you are not able to get ROI for this investment. In your situation how long it will take for a break even?

<<  <  Page 3/5  >  >>


Partner Zone
Latest Analysis
The promise of the Internet of Things (IoT) is that devices, gadgets, and appliances we use every day will be able to communicate with one another. This potential is not limited to household items or smartphones, but also things we find in our yard and garden, as evidenced by a recent challenge from the element14 design community.
Researchers have developed a new flexible fabric that integrates both movement and sensors, introducing new potential for technology-embedded clothing and soft robots.
Made by Monkeys highlights products that somehow slipped by the QC cops.
If you didn't realize that PowerPoint presentations are inherently hilarious, you have to see Don McMillan take one apart. McMillan -- aka the Technically Funny Comic -- worked for 10 years as an engineer before he switched to stand-up comedy.
The first Tacoma Narrows Bridge was a Washington State suspension bridge that opened in 1940 and spanned the Tacoma Narrows strait of Puget Sound between Tacoma and the Kitsap Peninsula. It opened to traffic on July 1, 1940, and dramatically collapsed into Puget Sound on November 7, just four months after it opened.
More:Blogs|News
Design News Webinar Series
11/19/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
11/6/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
10/7/2014 8:00 a.m. California / 11:00 a.m. New York
12/11/2014 8:00 a.m. California / 11:00 a.m. New York
Quick Poll
The Continuing Education Center offers engineers an entirely new way to get the education they need to formulate next-generation solutions.
Dec 1 - 5, An Introduction to Embedded Software Architecture and Design
SEMESTERS: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6


Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.
Last Archived Class
Sponsored by Littelfuse
Learn More   |   Login   |   Archived Classes
Twitter Feed
Design News Twitter Feed
Like Us on Facebook

Sponsored Content

Technology Marketplace

Copyright © 2014 UBM Canon, A UBM company, All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service