HOME  |  NEWS  |  BLOGS  |  MESSAGES  |  FEATURES  |  VIDEOS  |  WEBINARS  |  INDUSTRIES  |  FOCUS ON FUNDAMENTALS
  |  REGISTER  |  LOGIN  |  HELP
Comments
View Comments: Newest First|Oldest First|Threaded View
Page 1/4  >  >>
Rob Spiegel
User Rank
Blogger
Re: NASA and private partners
Rob Spiegel   1/15/2014 2:23:49 PM
NO RATINGS
Actually, that is pretty logical, Ann. The next space race may be the race of robots. Could be a good movie.

Ann R. Thryft
User Rank
Blogger
Re: NASA and private partners
Ann R. Thryft   1/7/2014 11:59:13 AM
NO RATINGS
That's a tough one to predict, Rob. I'd think that since the Chinese sent a robot not a human, it might encourage the US to pursue robotic, not human, space flight. But that might be too logical...

Rob Spiegel
User Rank
Blogger
Re: NASA and private partners
Rob Spiegel   1/7/2014 7:42:06 AM
NO RATINGS
Ann, do you think China's move to the moon will chnage the U.S. view of human-based space flight? 

Ann R. Thryft
User Rank
Blogger
Re: NASA and private partners
Ann R. Thryft   1/3/2014 3:46:21 PM
NO RATINGS
You're welcome, Rob. The fact that I write a lot about NASA and others working on space exploration robots pretty much sums up my views. I think the idea of human exploration is very catchy, and has a lot of psychological momentum behind it, but I don't think it's a likely reality, either technically, financially or politically.

Rob Spiegel
User Rank
Blogger
Re: NASA and private partners
Rob Spiegel   1/3/2014 2:43:45 PM
NO RATINGS
Thanks for the link, Ann. What are your thoughts about human-based versus non-human-based missions?

Rob Spiegel
User Rank
Blogger
Re: NASA and private partners
Rob Spiegel   1/3/2014 1:38:04 PM
NO RATINGS
Yes, Notarboca, the NASA folks were very positive about private venture developments.

Ann R. Thryft
User Rank
Blogger
Re: NASA and private partners
Ann R. Thryft   1/3/2014 1:01:07 PM
NO RATINGS
Rob, thanks for this report on what NASA is up to. I've looked at some of the pieces of what they're doing, such as the 3D printer development, some of the robotics and rover R&D, and their interest in developing more private-sector materials and other tech for human space flight:
http://www.designnews.com/author.asp?section_id=1392&doc_id=268174
It's great to get a firsthand overview of what they're thinking about. Lucky you to have that tour and thanks for sharing it.



notarboca
User Rank
Gold
Re: NASA and private partners
notarboca   12/30/2013 2:20:44 PM
NO RATINGS
Just the thought of being human mission ready in three years is intriguing and goes to show that NASA is not just wasting money.  I would also think that NASA would be supportive of private ventures to fill in the spaces where they don't have budget.

Rob Spiegel
User Rank
Blogger
Re: NASA and private partners
Rob Spiegel   12/30/2013 1:04:57 PM
NO RATINGS
After talking with NASA scientists, it's my impression that yes, NASA is supportive of private-sector space developments. And while NASA continues to develop technologies to support human-based missions, they have yet to get a go-ahead from our political leaders.

GlennA
User Rank
Gold
NASA and private partners
GlennA   12/25/2013 12:59:35 PM
NO RATINGS
The climate between NASA and private space companies is supposed to be very good now.  Does anyone have more information about a Space-X and NASA collaboration for manned missions ?  Supposedly the Falcon was designed to be human-rated from the start, instead of a corgo-rated version to be followed by a human-rated version.

Page 1/4  >  >>


Partner Zone
Latest Analysis
Just how far has handheld gaming technology come? Let's take a look inside the Nintendo 3DS XL and find out.
Design, simulation, manufacturability, and prototyping: All of these phases are being pushed forward and progressively by underlying technologies.
Wal-Mart will hold its second Made in the USA Open Call July 7-8, at its headquarters in Bentonville, Ark. The event will be a repeat effort by the world’s biggest seller of consumer goods to increase the amount of US-made products it sells in Wal-Mart stores, in Sam’s Club members-only wholesale outlets, and on walmart.com.
From design feasibility, to development, to production, having the right information to make good decisions can ultimately keep a product from failing validation. The key is highly focused information that doesn’t come from conventional, statistics-based tests but from accelerated stress testing.
There’s a good chance that a few of the things mentioned here won't fully come to fruition in 2015 but rather much later down the line. However, as Malcolm X once said, "The future belongs to those who prepare for it today."
More:Blogs|News
Quick Poll
The Continuing Education Center offers engineers an entirely new way to get the education they need to formulate next-generation solutions.
Jul 6 - 10, Building Raspberry Pi Controllers with Python
SEMESTERS: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6 |  7


Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.
Learn More   |   Login   |   Archived Classes
Twitter Feed
Design News Twitter Feed
Like Us on Facebook

Sponsored Content

Technology Marketplace

Copyright © 2015 UBM Canon, A UBM company, All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service