HOME  |  NEWS  |  BLOGS  |  MESSAGES  |  FEATURES  |  VIDEOS  |  WEBINARS  |  INDUSTRIES  |  FOCUS ON FUNDAMENTALS
  |  REGISTER  |  LOGIN  |  HELP
Habib Tariq
User Rank
Iron
What doesn’t work on paper will definitely not work in real life
Habib Tariq   12/17/2013 7:46:02 PM
NO RATINGS
A very valid point you have made. What doesn't work on paper will definitely not work in real life. Plus a well-researched project does progress at a better rate and actually has a chance of making it to the finish line.

Habib Tariq
User Rank
Iron
Re: What doesn’t work on paper will definitely not work in real life
Habib Tariq   12/17/2013 7:46:34 PM
NO RATINGS
For example take civil engineering. You need to have the map of the house before you can actually start building it.

Plus in the middle of the project you may come up with better solutions and ideas to incorporate in it but if you haven't thought of them before, it might be too late to include them

Tom Kramer
User Rank
Blogger
Re: What doesn’t work on paper will definitely not work in real life
Tom Kramer   12/18/2013 9:56:20 AM
NO RATINGS
The map of the house is a great analogy. Many details regarding the homeowners preferences need to be known before the construction crew starts building. Why do they wat the sink here, or over there? Where is the ceiling to be vaulted? Which direction do they want the staircase to face, and why? We need to know this stuff.

Sadly, so often we see a high amount of engineering effort go into product development before the "house plans" have been sketched in, even at a primary level.

Nancy Golden
User Rank
Platinum
Fair Statement
Nancy Golden   12/18/2013 9:44:28 AM
NO RATINGS
"Finally, some people claim that doing design research puts too much restraint on their creativity. Ironically, a robust design research process actually gives you a lot of design freedom. Even better, it points you more directly to where the majority of all your creative energies should be focused, which can drastically increase product development efficiency and innovation."

I think this is a very fair statement. I would think the challenge is determining how much up front research is enough - striking a balance between the amount of research to be done and when to move into the next phase. Also, understanding your target audience is key - usability feedback must be from actual users rather than people from a generalized group that fall into a predefined category.

Tom Kramer
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Fair Statement
Tom Kramer   12/18/2013 9:52:26 AM
NO RATINGS
Good point Nancy. Sometimes it is a matter of doing the most you can with the small amount of resourced available at the beginning of a project. This is just reality. And you are correct, WAY too many R&D people just think, "I would do it this way", or "this seems to work for me". These people may be from Mars, and actual users may be from Venus!

Nancy Golden
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Fair Statement
Nancy Golden   12/18/2013 10:29:12 AM
NO RATINGS
Tom, I myself am guilty of "WAY too many R&D people just think, "I would do it this way", or "this seems to work for me". These people may be from Mars, and actual users may be from Venus!"

Not so much on test equipment projects as we generally had predefined customer specs and a huge experience base that went a long way - I designed production and lab test equipment and we were pretty good at what we did with a thorough understanding of the operating environment. Because we maintained what we built and interacted with the operators on a daily basis, usability was already a part of our paradigm.

So it seems funny to me that I didn't take this into consideration when I was designing my small business website. I developed it the way I liked it - without considering whether or not it was user friendly to my audience - I assumed that since it made sense to me, it would make sense to others. Since I was an engineer who owned horses, and my target audience was horse owners, this did not translate so well. My engineering background was a liabiity in my design since most of my audience were rural non-engineers with access to limited technology(some are still on dial-up). After conducting some usability studies I implemented some major changes that met the needs of my customers much more effectively. While this is not the development of a product - it does illustrate the need for researcjh up front rather than operating on just your own instincts.


William K.
User Rank
Platinum
Focus group, or hocus-focus?
William K.   12/18/2013 12:28:38 PM
NO RATINGS
The comments about putting prototypes in front 0of people brings to my mind that great lie,"Consumers are demanding this", when that is not the case at all. What happens is that marketing types think up some feature to make their product different. We see them worshiping "product differentiation", which is supposed to bring out those features that somebody is demanding, while the truth is that nobody ever thought of that feature. 

AND OF COURSE the new feature is never tested as to useability or usefullness, or how it will work with other functions. 

So it is indeed vital to do some actual research, much more than asking a group of five, who happen to not need to be at work, what they think of some offering. And it is indeed far better to first find out where an actual need is, and then do a bit more research, and finally come up with a design concept and a design.

Tool_maker
User Rank
Platinum
Is it "One size fits all?"
Tool_maker   12/18/2013 1:16:43 PM
NO RATINGS
  I am always hesitant to agree with anyone who declares, "This is THE WAY it is done." Which is written first; the music or the words? Depends on the artist.

  I worked with and for a man who rarely had an original thought, yet he was able to improve on almost any project we had, once someone else got the process rolling. He used to joke that he was only good at second-guessing, but it worked for him. He became very wealthy and retired early to a life of ease.

tekochip
User Rank
Platinum
Multiple Paths
tekochip   12/18/2013 4:29:47 PM
NO RATINGS
Time and time again I would put the user interface through its paces and find flaws in the specification,  or put it in front of the customer to see that it wasn't really what they wanted.  OEMs will draw screen shots of what they want, but rarely practice the process of pushing buttons and watching the display change.  We started filming people when they had their first experience with a user interface and were always surprised to see what button they would attempt to press for a desired function.  I still feel the best user interface allows multiple paths to the same function.


Tom Kramer
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Multiple Paths
Tom Kramer   12/18/2013 5:03:32 PM
NO RATINGS
Interesting... when you are attempting to design multiple paths to a single function, how do you ensure that it is clear which path is a priority, or put more simply, how do you make sure the user is not confused by the multiple paths?

tekochip
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Multiple Paths
tekochip   12/18/2013 5:57:17 PM
NO RATINGS
As a quick example; alowing Cancel and Back to perform the same function and take you back to the previous screen.

ChuckMahoney
User Rank
Gold
what is the problem to be solved?
ChuckMahoney   12/20/2013 9:53:02 AM
NO RATINGS
Tom - good article, thanks. The first step in NPD is to answer the question " what problem do my customers need to solve" and from there devleop the checklist as you suggest. You're correct, too many companies come up with their version of a "solution" first, then ask users if they like it - it is a backwards approach. I'm going to forward this article to my coleagues in marketing.

One side note: working on only one cup of coffee, I read your sentence "You should walk away from this type or research thinking" as "you should avoid thinking about research this way". After a few minutes I realized "you should come away from this type of research knowing that:" Then it all made sense! Time for more coffee...

Tom Kramer
User Rank
Blogger
Re: what is the problem to be solved?
Tom Kramer   12/20/2013 10:45:19 AM
NO RATINGS
Thanks Chuck. Good catch on the phrasing idiom, I can see how that could be taken the wrong way.

GlennA
User Rank
Gold
concept vs history
GlennA   12/25/2013 12:30:38 PM
NO RATINGS
Another thing that research should include is whether there was a previous version of the same product that failed and why, and whether there is a current competing product, and whether it will be possible to break into the market.

Tom Kramer
User Rank
Blogger
Re: concept vs history
Tom Kramer   1/2/2014 2:47:02 PM
NO RATINGS
Good point Glenn... a lot can be learned from that.



Partner Zone
Latest Analysis
Advertised as the "Most Powerful Tablet Under $100," the Kindle Fire HD 6 was too tempting for the team at iFixit to pass up. Join us to find out if inexpensive means cheap, irreparable, or just down right economical. It's teardown time!
The first photos made with a 3D-printed telescope are here and they're not as fuzzy as you might expect. A team from the University of Sheffield beat NASA to the goal. The photos of the Moon were made with a reflecting telescope that cost the research team £100 to make (about $161 US).
At Medical Design & Manufacturing Midwest, Joe Wascow told Design News how Optimal Design prototyped a machine that captures the wing-beat of a duck.
The increased adoption of wireless technology for mission-critical applications has revved up the global market for dynamic electronic general purpose (GP) test equipment. As the link between cloud networks and devices -- smartphones, tablets, and notebooks -- results in more complex devices under test, the demand for radio frequency test equipment is starting to intensify.
Much of the research on lithium-ion batteries is focused on how to make the batteries charge more quickly and last longer than they currently do, work that would significantly improve the experience of mobile device users, as well EV and hybrid car drivers. Researchers in Singapore have come up with what seems like the best solution so far -- a battery that can recharge itself in mere minutes and has a potential lifespan of 20 years.
More:Blogs|News
Design News Webinar Series
10/7/2014 8:00 a.m. California / 11:00 a.m. New York
9/25/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
9/10/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
7/23/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
Quick Poll
The Continuing Education Center offers engineers an entirely new way to get the education they need to formulate next-generation solutions.
Oct 20 - 24, How to Design & Build an Embedded Web Server: An Embedded TCP/IP Tutorial
SEMESTERS: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6


Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.
Next Class: 10/28-10/30 11:00 AM
Sponsored by Stratasys
Next Class: 10/28-10/30 2:00 PM
Sponsored by Gates Corporation
Next Class: 11/11-11/13 2:00 PM
Sponsored by Littelfuse
Learn More   |   Login   |   Archived Classes
Twitter Feed
Design News Twitter Feed
Like Us on Facebook

Sponsored Content

Technology Marketplace

Copyright © 2014 UBM Canon, A UBM company, All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service