HOME  |  NEWS  |  BLOGS  |  MESSAGES  |  FEATURES  |  VIDEOS  |  WEBINARS  |  INDUSTRIES  |  FOCUS ON FUNDAMENTALS
  |  REGISTER  |  LOGIN  |  HELP
Page 1/2  >  >>
Elizabeth M
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Re : Safety first
Elizabeth M   12/3/2013 6:57:22 AM
NO RATINGS
I see your point here as well, talmoortariq, but as another reader pointed out, maybe it's better at the moment to have both human- and automation-controlled systems in terms of safety until software and other technology like this is perfected.

Elizabeth M
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Safety first
Elizabeth M   12/3/2013 6:56:10 AM
NO RATINGS
Yes, I'm with you, talmoortariq, this is a good effort by Rockwell and as a leader in automation systems they also should be also taking a leadesrhip role in this arena.

Elizabeth M
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Re : Safety first
Elizabeth M   12/3/2013 6:47:02 AM
NO RATINGS
AandY, I tend to agree with you here. While of course I think any efforts to add safety to automation processes should be supported, I think that partial automation is probably the best way to go, at least for now. Perhaps in the future systems can be a bit more foolproof--and humans themselves aren't perfect either. But at the moment I think having a human keep an eye on things is the better option.

taimoortariq
User Rank
Gold
Re: Re : Safety first
taimoortariq   11/30/2013 10:47:09 PM
NO RATINGS
You are right, incorporating this software in the automation systems will make the system even more reliable, certainly humans are capable to making random errors.

taimoortariq
User Rank
Gold
Re: Safety first
taimoortariq   11/30/2013 10:41:53 PM
NO RATINGS
You are right Elizabeth, a company will never use an automation solution that is not reliable and safe. overlooking the saftey of systems can cause company a great deal of fortune. Rockwell has certainly taken a great step, it seems like many companies will integerate this software in their systems since it aims to make the saftey of the automated systems more systematic and coordinated.

AnandY
User Rank
Gold
Re : Safety first
AnandY   11/29/2013 11:19:15 AM
NO RATINGS
I have always supported automation in all areas of production except for safety and it will be interesting to see how Rockwell fares with the new systems. In my professional opinion, and given the importance of staying safe at the workplace, I believe that this is an area best served by partial automation systems overseen at every level by humans.

a.saji
User Rank
Silver
Re: Safety first
a.saji   11/28/2013 11:05:21 PM
NO RATINGS
@Elizabath: Yes you have to evaluate the risk first. If its not worth then there is no use in investing.     

a.saji
User Rank
Silver
Re: Toolkits
a.saji   11/27/2013 11:50:34 PM
NO RATINGS
@TJ: That is the difference between them and the rest in the market. The more you allow to interact with the outside tools more you gain out of it. It opens more options for you in the market.

TJ McDermott
User Rank
Blogger
Toolkits
TJ McDermott   11/27/2013 6:20:58 PM
NO RATINGS
Rockwell has a number of very good accelerator toolkits, but the safety one has been the hardest to use successfully.  Rockwell also offers the use of a 3rd party software (Sistema) that is supposed to make calculating the SIL of a system simple but it's got a pretty steep learning curve.

Elizabeth M
User Rank
Blogger
Safety first
Elizabeth M   11/27/2013 11:09:43 AM
NO RATINGS
No matter how many bells or whistles an automation system has, it's not worth much if it's not safe. I think Rockwell is on the right track here in its focus on safety and it will go a long way to making more innovation possible.

Page 1/2  >  >>


Partner Zone
Latest Analysis
Last year you helped Design News and Allied Electronics crown its first-ever Gadget Freak of the Year, and we need your help again. Vote in round 2 of our second-annual contest.
The key to autonomous driving is not to forget about the driver, and to remember that passengers want a sense of control, as opposed to being utterly passive backseat drivers.
HP revealed more of its 3D printing plans in a recent webinar. Senior vice president of inkjet and graphics solution business Stephen Nigro spoke about how the technology works and expanded on HP's vision of open collaboration to commercialize its Multi Jet Fusion 3D printing technology for end-production, and open collaboration on new materials. He also said HP will create software to help users decide when to use Multi Jet Fusion versus conventional subtractive manufacturing.
Get a load of these strange product designs. What's in the water these design engineers are drinking?
The Dutch are known for their love of bicycling, and they’ve also long been early adopters of green-energy and smart-city technologies. So it seems fitting that a town in which painter Vincent van Gogh once lived has given him a very Dutch-like tribute -- a bike path lit by a special smart paint in the style of the artist's “Starry Night” painting.
More:Blogs|News
Design News Webinar Series
11/19/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
11/6/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
10/7/2014 8:00 a.m. California / 11:00 a.m. New York
12/11/2014 8:00 a.m. California / 11:00 a.m. New York
Quick Poll
The Continuing Education Center offers engineers an entirely new way to get the education they need to formulate next-generation solutions.
Dec 1 - 5, An Introduction to Embedded Software Architecture and Design
SEMESTERS: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6


Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.
Last Archived Class
Sponsored by Littelfuse
Learn More   |   Login   |   Archived Classes
Twitter Feed
Design News Twitter Feed
Like Us on Facebook

Sponsored Content

Technology Marketplace

Copyright © 2014 UBM Canon, A UBM company, All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service