HOME  |  NEWS  |  BLOGS  |  MESSAGES  |  FEATURES  |  VIDEOS  |  WEBINARS  |  INDUSTRIES  |  FOCUS ON FUNDAMENTALS
  |  REGISTER  |  LOGIN  |  HELP
Page 1/2  >  >>
NadineJ
User Rank
Platinum
very interesting!
NadineJ   11/11/2013 4:43:10 PM
NO RATINGS
This is one of the better articles I've seen here on 3D printing in a long time.  The "cool" and "wow" factor has covered, ad nauseam.  Connecting the dots to green manufacturing is very interesting.

I look forward to hearing more about cloud 3D printing. 

Debera Harward
User Rank
Silver
Re: very interesting!
Debera Harward   11/12/2013 1:59:44 AM
NO RATINGS
Thanks Ann, for such an informative post , According to me 3D printers used for personal use will be more cost effective as compared to those used for mass production because less raw material will be used. The example that you mentioned in your article regarding children block makes it very clear that 3D printing can be cheap because when we make objects by orselves we can chooe the type of the product , traditionally such blocks are made of wood but we can make them with plastic making them partially totally hollow from inside this reduces the material and drop down the cost of manufacturing as well.

Debera Harward
User Rank
Silver
Re: very interesting!
Debera Harward   11/12/2013 2:56:41 AM
NO RATINGS
3D printing is no doubt a greener technology , less energy is required in this process which in result produces very little carbon dioxide which is harmfull to the enviornment .  I have read somewhere that people are using filamaker that is a machine in their homes with 3D printers that takes in used plastic and releases fresh strings of plastic.

Jim_E
User Rank
Platinum
Saving up to $2000? Really?
Jim_E   11/12/2013 9:28:03 AM
NO RATINGS
Color me skeptical with the quote of "an average household could save up to $2,000 a year making their own plastic products at home".  I guess that the "Up To" clause covers them, but I really don't see many households purchasing $2000 worth of plastic products a year which can be printed at home!

NadineJ
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Saving up to $2000? Really?
NadineJ   11/12/2013 10:15:58 AM
NO RATINGS
That's a good point.  "Up to" can be great qualifier to exaggerate.

Printing children's product is problematic.  There are scores of regulations for reasons.  Making children's toys from recycled plastic is nice and trendy but not very safe.  For example, it would be almost impossible to know if the toy is BPA free.  Anyone giving them away as gifts or selling the item at a DIY/Makers Fair could get into trouble for endangering children.

Cadman-LT
User Rank
Platinum
Wow
Cadman-LT   11/12/2013 12:03:52 PM
NO RATINGS
What a great article Ann. It blew me away.

Cadman-LT
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Wow
Cadman-LT   11/12/2013 12:06:04 PM
NO RATINGS
We have been talking about this for awhile now...3D printing....I knew this would happen, but so soon?

Cadman-LT
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Wow
Cadman-LT   11/12/2013 12:10:21 PM
NO RATINGS
Maybe it'll be like the microwave was...eventually everyone will have one and it will be common....need a cup..print one......it's crazy! Crazy kewl!

Greg M. Jung
User Rank
Platinum
Type of Process
Greg M. Jung   11/12/2013 9:21:22 PM
NO RATINGS
Good perspective on the energy savings benefits of 3D printing.  However, one further consideration  to evaluate when classifying a 3D printer as 'green' is which process is being used?  I may have a different definition than others, but I assume that 'green' also means less harmful or toxic to human beings.

Some 3D printers may use less energy, but certain processes use hazardous or toxic materials (which can be harmful to humans).  One 3D process that I used would cause skin allergies if the user was over-exposed due to frequent contact.  Another process caused my co-worker to have a brief case of silicosis.  I would suggest that in addition to energy consumption, that 'green' metrics also include the potential impact to the environment and to the operator's health.

Ann R. Thryft
User Rank
Blogger
Re: very interesting!
Ann R. Thryft   11/13/2013 11:52:34 AM
NO RATINGS
Glad you liked it, Debera. I thought the research was timely, well-conceived, thorough, and well-executed.

Page 1/2  >  >>


Partner Zone
Latest Analysis
Advertised as the "Most Powerful Tablet Under $100," the Kindle Fire HD 6 was too tempting for the team at iFixit to pass up. Join us to find out if inexpensive means cheap, irreparable, or just down right economical. It's teardown time!
The first photos made with a 3D-printed telescope are here and they're not as fuzzy as you might expect. A team from the University of Sheffield beat NASA to the goal. The photos of the Moon were made with a reflecting telescope that cost the research team 100 to make (about $161 US).
At Medical Design & Manufacturing Midwest, Joe Wascow told Design News how Optimal Design prototyped a machine that captures the wing-beat of a duck.
The increased adoption of wireless technology for mission-critical applications has revved up the global market for dynamic electronic general purpose (GP) test equipment. As the link between cloud networks and devices -- smartphones, tablets, and notebooks -- results in more complex devices under test, the demand for radio frequency test equipment is starting to intensify.
Much of the research on lithium-ion batteries is focused on how to make the batteries charge more quickly and last longer than they currently do, work that would significantly improve the experience of mobile device users, as well EV and hybrid car drivers. Researchers in Singapore have come up with what seems like the best solution so far -- a battery that can recharge itself in mere minutes and has a potential lifespan of 20 years.
More:Blogs|News
Design News Webinar Series
10/7/2014 8:00 a.m. California / 11:00 a.m. New York
9/25/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
9/10/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
7/23/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
Quick Poll
The Continuing Education Center offers engineers an entirely new way to get the education they need to formulate next-generation solutions.
Oct 20 - 24, How to Design & Build an Embedded Web Server: An Embedded TCP/IP Tutorial
SEMESTERS: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6


Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.
Next Class: 10/28-10/30 11:00 AM
Sponsored by Stratasys
Next Class: 10/28-10/30 2:00 PM
Sponsored by Gates Corporation
Learn More   |   Login   |   Archived Classes
Twitter Feed
Design News Twitter Feed
Like Us on Facebook

Sponsored Content

Technology Marketplace

Copyright © 2014 UBM Canon, A UBM company, All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service