HOME  |  NEWS  |  BLOGS  |  MESSAGES  |  FEATURES  |  VIDEOS  |  WEBINARS  |  INDUSTRIES  |  FOCUS ON FUNDAMENTALS
  |  REGISTER  |  LOGIN  |  HELP
<<  <  Page 2/4  >  >>
Ralphy Boy
User Rank
Platinum
Re: and my choice is...
Ralphy Boy   10/30/2013 12:07:50 AM
NO RATINGS
Well that was fun Chuck...

Hot Wheels! But that boxy taxi... Honda's Fuya-Jo... OMG Ugly...

William K.
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Human Imagination
William K.   10/29/2013 8:51:47 PM
NO RATINGS
Ervin, my feeling is that if every artist was an engineer then most of them would probably not be artists. I see the two talents pointing in different directions. Of course some engineers do appreciate appearances but only a few follow appearance to the detriment of functionality. That task is most often handled by marketing and cost reduction groups.

But sometimes it becomes quite clear that some engineers have no concept of what looks good and what does not, and unfortunately a few of them have been architects responsible for buildings that the rest of us have to see.

William K.
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Chrysler Atlantic 2
William K.   10/29/2013 8:42:23 PM
NO RATINGS
That FourJoy looked every bit as impractical as any of the concept cars shown. And it was not nearly sporty enough to be a fun sports type of vehicle. WHAt were they thinking?

The Dodge pickup would have sold a lot if they had put regular type doors on it, it looked much cooler than the El Camino. But Chrysler management of that era was often immume to creativity, except for my 1965 Barracuda. I loved that car. With a few modifications to the suspension it handled like a real race car.

Ann R. Thryft
User Rank
Blogger
Chrysler Atlantic 2
Ann R. Thryft   10/29/2013 2:54:13 PM
NO RATINGS
I like the looks of the Chrysler Atlantic. It was also fun to see the Mustang prototype. OTOH, Daimler's Smart Fourjoy looks really impractical to me.



tluxon
User Rank
Gold
Re: Unoriginal
tluxon   10/29/2013 2:34:09 PM
NO RATINGS
Right - someone clearly thought "unnecessary ballast" was a clever turn of phrase, but that pesky "ballast" on any car is almost never considered unnecessary by the designers.  The real indicator as to whether it's necessary or not would ultimately be determined by the marketplace.

ervin0072002
User Rank
Gold
Human Imagination
ervin0072002   10/29/2013 2:23:47 PM
NO RATINGS
I think this is useful art. Only if every artist was also an engineer dont you think the world would be a better place?

Jim S
User Rank
Gold
Re: Technology from concept cars
Jim S   10/29/2013 1:13:46 PM
NO RATINGS
I was only saying the technology could possibly be adapted for another purpose. Out of all of them I liked the Buick Y the most.

Tool_maker
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Technology from concept cars
Tool_maker   10/29/2013 12:52:01 PM
NO RATINGS
@Jim S: To me the BMW looks like a death trap. I think it would lose in a collision with a Smart Car and that is saying something. On the cars I like the old Buick best, but what I really found facinating was the Big Hair on the two models with the 70 Mustang. It brought back uncomfortable memories of choking on my wife's hairspray before we left the house. I wonder how much lung damage is a remnant of that era.

  Great show Charles. I agree with an earlier poster about all of the glass. That reminds me of an AMC Pacer. Yuchh.

Jim S
User Rank
Gold
Technology from concept cars
Jim S   10/29/2013 10:21:33 AM
NO RATINGS
The BMW concept seems to have technology that could be adapted to aircraft design. The shape changing capability could re-form a wing from a low drag high speed airfoil to a high drag low speed airfoil. The transition could be such that all intermediate combinations would allow an aircraft to operate in all flight regimes. This would allow the same aircraft to go from STOL to high speed flight, extending it's utility.

rmz
User Rank
Iron
Chrysler Atlantic
rmz   10/29/2013 10:05:51 AM
NO RATINGS
This was clearly a Chrysler update ( ripoff) of the Bugatti "Atlantique"  design of the 1930's.  

<<  <  Page 2/4  >  >>


Partner Zone
Latest Analysis
Thanksgiving is a time for family. A time for togetherness. A time for… tech?
The promise of the Internet of Things (IoT) is that devices, gadgets, and appliances we use every day will be able to communicate with one another. This potential is not limited to household items or smartphones, but also things we find in our yard and garden, as evidenced by a recent challenge from the element14 design community.
Researchers have developed a new flexible fabric that integrates both movement and sensors, introducing new potential for technology-embedded clothing and soft robots.
Made by Monkeys highlights products that somehow slipped by the QC cops.
If you didn't realize that PowerPoint presentations are inherently hilarious, you have to see Don McMillan take one apart. McMillan -- aka the Technically Funny Comic -- worked for 10 years as an engineer before he switched to stand-up comedy.
More:Blogs|News
Design News Webinar Series
11/19/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
11/6/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
10/7/2014 8:00 a.m. California / 11:00 a.m. New York
12/11/2014 8:00 a.m. California / 11:00 a.m. New York
Quick Poll
The Continuing Education Center offers engineers an entirely new way to get the education they need to formulate next-generation solutions.
Dec 1 - 5, An Introduction to Embedded Software Architecture and Design
SEMESTERS: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6


Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.
Last Archived Class
Sponsored by Littelfuse
Learn More   |   Login   |   Archived Classes
Twitter Feed
Design News Twitter Feed
Like Us on Facebook

Sponsored Content

Technology Marketplace

Copyright © 2014 UBM Canon, A UBM company, All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service