@AnandY: I agree with your comment about the touchscreen. This desk reminds me of the Hamilton Drawing Board I worked on before shifting to CAD. A simple foot peddle allowed up & down with a sprng counter balance.
I can put a price on good health, and my employer can too. I could pay my health club fees for quite a while with that, it is just too much money for the common man. I really like the idea though, and have toyed with raising my desk and getting a tall chair to switch off from standing. If the described desk was thin and could fit right over an existing one, then I wouldn't have to give up my existing desk and drawers either. As an engineer, I've tried to imagine a simple/cheap mechanism I could put under the legs of my existing desk to raise and lower it manually, which is also good excersize.
Donald Rumsfield, and Thomas Jefferson also worked at standing desks if memory serves, and perhaps many more notables.
It's a nice idea to have a single desk that you can use both while standing and sitting. That said, Cabe, I believe adding in the touchscreen adjustments were a little unnecessary. Yes we are embracing technology but that, to me, is going overboard and only makes the desk more expensive for no reason. What happened to a simple button that can be pressed and do the same thing at a fraction of the cost?
I saw these when I was doing research online one day--very cool! I am happy that I don't work in a typical "office" anymore, but for people who do, it's great they now have more ergnomic and comfortable options. I am suffering wrist pain now from time to time and I think it's from years of sitting at a desk and in front of a computer without the right kind of equipment.
Engineers at Fuel Cell Energy have found a way to take advantage of a side reaction, unique to their carbonate fuel cell that has nothing to do with energy production, as a potential, cost-effective solution to capturing carbon from fossil fuel power plants.
To get to a trillion sensors in the IoT that we all look forward to, there are many challenges to commercialization that still remain, including interoperability, the lack of standards, and the issue of security, to name a few.
This is part one of an article discussing the University of Washington’s nationally ranked FSAE electric car (eCar) and combustible car (cCar). Stay tuned for part two, tomorrow, which will discuss the four unique PCBs used in both the eCar and cCars.
Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.