HOME  |  NEWS  |  BLOGS  |  MESSAGES  |  FEATURES  |  VIDEOS  |  WEBINARS  |  INDUSTRIES  |  FOCUS ON FUNDAMENTALS
  |  REGISTER  |  LOGIN  |  HELP
Comments
View Comments: Newest First|Oldest First|Threaded View
<<  <  Page 3/5  >  >>
Parris Boyd
User Rank
Gold
Re: Variable Valve Timing
Parris Boyd   10/21/2013 11:22:42 AM
NO RATINGS
Agreed, Rob. And the relatively small number of owners also doesn't help when it comes to class-action lawsuits. If a problem of this magnitude had surfaced in Camrys, etc., there would have been a recall years ago, heralded by mainstream media all over the world.

Rob Spiegel
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Variable Valve Timing
Rob Spiegel   10/21/2013 9:51:13 AM
NO RATINGS
Parris, it does seem that this story would be bigger if it were not confined to a limited production vehicle. Seems that at a certain point, Toyota cut its losses with the Spyder and moved on.

William K.
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Variable Valve Timing
William K.   10/20/2013 9:23:35 PM
NO RATINGS
The fact is that it was possible to pass the Michigan emissions test in a properly running vehicle without the catalytic converter being in the ehaust stream at all. In two different vehicles I discovered this. So it is not like an individual would be doing such horrible pollution to remove those "Pre-cat" devices, which were primarily intended to provide emissions reduction until the main converter warmed up. And iif a person took mostly longer trips the additional emissions would not be a big deal. Now for those who go into hysteria at the thought of such tampering, neither of those vehicles isin existance any more.

Parris Boyd
User Rank
Gold
Re: Variable Valve Timing
Parris Boyd   10/19/2013 7:36:54 PM
NO RATINGS
Million thanks to Rob Spiegel for his posts confirming that the pre-cat problem is widespread and all over the Internet. Inexcusable for an automaker to get away with such a well-publicized defect. The MR2 Spyder is a limited production vehicle, appealing to a relatively small number of people, and Toyota has exploited that situation to the nth degree. 

Rob Spiegel
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Variable Valve Timing
Rob Spiegel   10/19/2013 5:28:18 PM
NO RATINGS
Good point, GTOLover. If the emission equipment is malfunctioning, it's probably worse than none. It's a shame Toyota didn't take responsibility for this. A couple online searches reveals that many, many owners got stuck with this problem.

1800ES
User Rank
Gold
Re: Variable Valve Timing
1800ES   10/18/2013 2:52:24 PM
NO RATINGS
I did remove the 'Essential Element' from my cat converter, and ran it like that for several years.  The car also PASSED idle/sniff emissions testing!  - Until they started the dynomometer testing, then it failed and I wound up putting another cat converter on.

Parris Boyd
User Rank
Gold
Re: Wait a sec!!!
Parris Boyd   10/18/2013 2:34:36 PM
NO RATINGS
Really appreciate folks expressing their interest in this matter - especially the environmental considerations - and offering technical information. GTOlover cut to the chase by pointing out that Toyota's refusal to address the situation leaves everyone guessing about the cause(s). I've spoken with attorneys, and as Toyota knows, the costs of a lawsuit make that venue highly unlikely. I'll continue to focus on EPA's responsibilities.


OLD_CURMUDGEON
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Wait a sec!!!
OLD_CURMUDGEON   10/18/2013 2:02:21 PM
NO RATINGS
Seems to me that initially it was 100K miles, but I guess successful lobbying has reduced it to 80K miles.  Still, this failure occurred, according to the report, at less than 1/2, AND it would seem that a case COULD be made that the failure of the "Pre-Cat" was the underlying cause of the engine failure.  Too bad someone hasn't challenged this in a court of law.  I'll bet then there'd be a different response from TOYOTA!!!

I've owned 4 TOYOTA vehicles in my driving career, and all but one have been superb vehicles.  I'd wholeheartedly recommend a TOYOTA product to anyone who asks me, but this seems to be a major coverup on their part.

Jim_E
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Wait a sec!!!
Jim_E   10/18/2013 1:03:55 PM
NO RATINGS
It appears that the Federal Emissions Warranty is 8 years, 80,000 miles:

http://www.epa.gov/obd/pubs/420f09048.pdf

Looks like it only covers the emissions components too.

Like GTO said, I would punch out the guts of that pre-cat in a second!

OLD_CURMUDGEON
User Rank
Platinum
Wait a sec!!!
OLD_CURMUDGEON   10/18/2013 12:14:43 PM
NO RATINGS
Is it not true that the auto manufacturers MUST guarantee the reliability of those components directly utilized for the purposes of "clean-air" for a period of 100K miles regardless of age of vehicle?

IF that is true, then how is it that this SPYDER vehicle with only 30K miles is NOT convered under this warranty since the engine failure can be directly traced to a failure of a component of the emissions-control systems?

<<  <  Page 3/5  >  >>


Partner Zone
Latest Analysis
We shared our list, now Design News readers tell us which artificial intelligence movies they watch again and again.
Researchers have been working on a number of alternative chemistries to lithium-ion for next-gen batteries, silicon-air among them. However, while the technology has been viewed as promising and cost-effective, to date researchers haven’t managed to develop a battery of this chemistry with a viable running time -- until now.
Norway-based additive manufacturing company Norsk Titanium is building what it says is the first industrial-scale 3D printing plant in the world for making aerospace-grade metal components. The New York state plant will produce 400 metric tons each year of aerospace-grade, structural titanium parts.
Researchers have simplified the fabrication of the geometric requirements for fluid motion in microrobots for in vivo medical applications.
The National Aeronautics and Space Administration’s recently announced plan to put an electric airplane in the air by 2018 is forward-looking, but hardly unique.
More:Blogs|News
Quick Poll
The Continuing Education Center offers engineers an entirely new way to get the education they need to formulate next-generation solutions.
Jul 11 - 15, Embedded System Design Techniques™ - Debugging Real-time Embedded Software – Hands on
SEMESTERS: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6 |  7 | 8 | 9 | 10


Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.
Learn More   |   Login   |   Archived Classes
Twitter Feed
Design News Twitter Feed
Like Us on Facebook

Technology Marketplace

Copyright © 2016 UBM Canon, A UBM company, All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service