HOME  |  NEWS  |  BLOGS  |  MESSAGES  |  FEATURES  |  VIDEOS  |  WEBINARS  |  INDUSTRIES  |  FOCUS ON FUNDAMENTALS
  |  REGISTER  |  LOGIN  |  HELP
Rob Spiegel
User Rank
Blogger
Practical improvments
Rob Spiegel   10/14/2013 5:14:56 PM
NO RATINGS
Sounds like Solidworks is presenting some helpful improvements, Cabe. The simulation function and the recording of changes in an ongoing history seem pretty good.

eSetter
User Rank
Iron
Interesting but misleading ...
eSetter   10/15/2013 8:20:11 AM
NO RATINGS
The author looks like copied and pasted a lot from "whats new"  for the new release of SolidWorks. The term "drawings" is used for everything  - from a part model through assembly to actual drawing.

Would be better if simillar articles are written more professionally.

ungarata
User Rank
Gold
Review article..?
ungarata   10/15/2013 8:56:37 AM
NO RATINGS
Cabe...some constructive criticism here.

I agree with eSetter.  I read this entire article, and then I see at the bottom that you haven't actually used it yet. I did get a sense that was the case, though, when I read "This will surely make working with complex...", focusing on the word "surely". Is this a review article, or free advertising for SW?

Once you've used the software, please write a review of it for us; the good, the bad, etc.  Maybe compare it to other CAD programs you've used, etc.  Do the new features work as promised, or are they buggy and a hassle?

You get the idea; it would be far more worth my time to read a review article made by an objective person that's testing out the software, than what I can read by going to SW's web sight, which is basically what this article is.  My only concern is that it appears that you're a big fan of SW (why else write this article?), and thus any review will not be objective, but will be biased towards SW by highlighting the good and glossing over the bad.

If you're going to write for the CAD/CAM corner, please give us some substance, not sales literature.

TJ McDermott
User Rank
Blogger
Fix the chronic problems!
TJ McDermott   10/15/2013 7:03:22 PM
NO RATINGS
I used SW2006.  My company didn't continue with software maintenance fees, and I eventually left that company for another.  My new company purchased SW2013 and one year's maintenance, so I'll get SW2014 when it rolls out.

In the 7 years between the two versions I've used, some of the same software bugs still exist!

Pray tell what good the maintenance fee is to a user?  We KNOW what good it is for Dassault Systems.

I'm minded to demand a free year of maintenance for each bug that crosses a major revision.

Cabe Atwell
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Review article..?
Cabe Atwell   10/23/2013 6:29:25 PM
NO RATINGS
Ungarata,

I used SW2014 at the launch event, and wrote that at the event. (10 or so articles)

But I have used past versions for years, including 2013 this past year. I'm versed.

I am a working engineer after all.

C



Partner Zone
Latest Analysis
Former DARPA official and Google executive Dr. Kaigham Gabriel believes sensor companies think too much like suppliers and need to bring their products closer to the consumer.
One way to keep a Formula One racing team moving at breakneck speed in the pit and at the test facility is to bring CAD drawings of the racing vehicleís parts down to the test facility and even out to the track.
Most of us would just as soon step on a cockroach rather than study it, but thatís just what researchers at UC Berkeley did in the pursuit of building small, nimble robots suitable for disaster-recovery and search-and-rescue missions.
Engineers at Festo were inspired by how a caterpillar builds its cocoon when designing its new 3D Cocooner printer.
Design engineers need to prepare for a future in which their electronic products will use not just one or two, but possibly many user interfaces that involve touch, vision, gestures, and even eye movements.
More:Blogs|News
Quick Poll
The Continuing Education Center offers engineers an entirely new way to get the education they need to formulate next-generation solutions.
SEMESTERS: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6 |  7 | 8 | 9


Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.
Next Course June 28-30:
Sponsored by Proto Labs
Learn More   |   Login   |   Archived Classes
Twitter Feed
Design News Twitter Feed
Like Us on Facebook

Technology Marketplace

Copyright © 2016 UBM Canon, A UBM company, All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service