jgundie, thanks for telling us that. I always find it interesting why some people notice certain patterns and others don't, and the circumstances surrounding what brings those patterns to the forefront.
Its not clear from the write up why no one noticed the lightning but thinking about it I realized that "99.9%" of lightning strikes caused "no" problem. The data got messed up but it was caught by the program and the data was sent again. So only "once in thousand times" did the lightning strike hit the narrow time window that caused corrupted data to be recieved. A crash would occurred only once every month or so which made the correlation harder and probably it happened at night!
This made me wonder how I figured it out(:|). Maybe a summer on a lookout in Idaho's primitive area helped. More recently I got envolved in analyzing the effect of lightning striking a satelite fueling facility and currents in a grounding line going through the satelite and causing some damage.
I think part of that depends on your discipline, Ann. As a test engineer it is critical to have a high awareness of both hardware and software operation...if you only think about one or the other you won't get very far. However, most folks do seem to be a bit better at one than the other - I guess that might be a function of how our brain works...while my husband and I do both hardware and software - he has more hardware expertise and I have more software expertise so when we do projects together he typically does the HW and I do the SW. So of course whenever there is a problem - it must be the HW :)
I find it mind-boggling that the engineers couldn't make the connection, and so many times. But sad to say, I have known many software people who don't seem, uh, connected to the physical world and how it works.
It's unbelievable that for 3 months the Computer Programming guys never noticed that the computers crashed only during thunderstorms. Surely, they should have. It's funny how technology makes us forget about nature. This proves how much the two are largely related.
In many engineering workplaces, there’s a generational conflict between recent engineering graduates and older, more experienced engineers. However, a recent study published in the psychology journal Cognition suggests that both may have something to learn from another group: 4 year olds.
Conventional wisdom holds that MIT, Cal Tech, and Stanford are three of the country’s best undergraduate engineering schools. Unfortunately, when conventional wisdom visits the topic of best engineering schools, it too often leaves out some of the most distinguished programs that don’t happen to offer PhD-level degrees.
Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.