Hi Elizabeth, Nadine - I think that what you're suggesting is exactly what's happening to make PLM more affordable. If you look at some of the new systems coming to market (Autodesk PLM360, Solair, Arena that RalphKC mentions) and even the cloud-based offerings of the 'historical' PLM providers, the technology is now within the reach of even small manufacturers - and they probably have less complex issues with the overlap problem!
Arena was one of the earliest ( maybe first) cloud based PLM providers. Started in 2000. Very effective tool, offered on a subscription basis, and at a cost point that is attractive to smaller companies. Their success is what drove some of the big ERP and CAD providers to re-evaluate the offering of PLM tools over the cloud. Should be on anyones list if they are evaluating PLM for their companies.
I didn't think of the cost-prohibitive angle, but you're right, Nadine. But I know there are some cloud-based PLM solutions out there now. I wonder if that could help solve the cost issue by allowing subscription-based pricing and the like.
Nice points, Tony. As you point out, we've seen all of these areas of software expand beyond their original premise (ERP now includes CRM and SCM modules). But PLM has expanded more than the others. Much of this can be attributed to Siemens. As well as touching ERP, CRM and SCM, PLM also now encompasses visualization, CAE, and simulation.
Product development selections are generally made by Product Managers or Marketing Managers (in many companies, Strategists). The data added by PLM, and the ability to connect that to a broader range of types of data, is part of the Big Data promise. The point is, once data is in the database (regardless of what technology is used) it can be used and manipulated. The first step is getting the data.
Thanks for this perspective, Tony. I think you're right that PLM--a term and technology that's been bandied about for years--is finally getting its due and coming into its own in the enterprise. Increasingly competitive markets and the increased need for speed in terms of innovation are definitely promoting this trend.
Engineers at Fuel Cell Energy have found a way to take advantage of a side reaction, unique to their carbonate fuel cell that has nothing to do with energy production, as a potential, cost-effective solution to capturing carbon from fossil fuel power plants.
To get to a trillion sensors in the IoT that we all look forward to, there are many challenges to commercialization that still remain, including interoperability, the lack of standards, and the issue of security, to name a few.
This is part one of an article discussing the University of Washington’s nationally ranked FSAE electric car (eCar) and combustible car (cCar). Stay tuned for part two, tomorrow, which will discuss the four unique PCBs used in both the eCar and cCars.
Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.