HOME  |  NEWS  |  BLOGS  |  MESSAGES  |  FEATURES  |  VIDEOS  |  WEBINARS  |  INDUSTRIES  |  FOCUS ON FUNDAMENTALS
  |  REGISTER  |  LOGIN  |  HELP
Comments
View Comments: Newest First|Oldest First|Threaded View
naperlou
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Developing depth requires the basics
naperlou   10/1/2013 1:29:45 PM
NO RATINGS
TJ, I have to agree with you.  I am in the second round of the college search.  My younger one is looking at computer science and computer or electrical engineering.  My older one started in aerospace engineering and has since gone to compter science, and is now starting a first job.

One thing I have noticed is that many schools teach basically the same curriculum for the first two years and then students can choose their major without taking more than the usual four years.  Of course, there are schools that do not do this, or that make it hard to change.  I do agree, though, with the need for a common core background in engineering.  I also think that a model based (or system engineering) approach is critical for moving forward.  In the aerospace business projects were staffed by just such multidisciplinary teams as Kevin mentions.  Stretching across this was a systems engineering function, with a very strong methodology in my experience.  This should be taught to all students, along with the industry tools used to realize it.  Using tools does not mean not learning the theory, though. 

JimT@Future-Product-Innovations
User Rank
Blogger
Disruptive vs. Incremental Solutions
JimT@Future-Product-Innovations   10/1/2013 12:46:08 PM
NO RATINGS
When Patents are granted -- one of the most barometric scales for indication of novelty -- the "grant" usually is "incremental" over an existing known process or method.  In sharp contrast, disruptive solutions are called disruptive for a good reason.  "Disruptive" burns-down those Silos you mentioned and upsets the apple-carts. "Disruptive" unseats long-standing leaders, and even topples industry giants. I attended a MAYA seminar a few years ago, and embrace most of the concepts and teachings.  Unfortunately, I found them to be intuitive and obvious.  The unfortunate part is that for 99% of people, they are NOT intuitive and obvious.  So, one big opportunity will be to introduce Human-Factors Engineering into Curriculums.  I believe this would be a great enabler of your intended long-term goal implied by the article.

Rob Spiegel
User Rank
Blogger
Name a problem -- then solve it
Rob Spiegel   10/1/2013 11:00:14 AM
NO RATINGS
Interesting article, Kevin. I think the first step if meeting the challenge to create a sustainable future is to break down needs into specific problems. The Bill and Melinda Foundation did a good job of this when they challoenged the engineering community to come up with a waterless toilet. The challenge worked -- in part because it was so specific. Here's some info: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/08/15/bill-and-melinda-gates-fo_n_1783013.html

TJ McDermott
User Rank
Blogger
Developing depth requires the basics
TJ McDermott   10/1/2013 10:57:22 AM
NO RATINGS
To develop the engineering depth described in the article, to develop the multidisciplinary engineering groups, the basics need to be be taught and learned first.  There's no getting around that.

Engineering students MUST learn mechanics and dynamics, strength of materials, electrical theory before they can even begin to be useful.  There must be a solid foundation on which to build.



Partner Zone
Latest Analysis
Thanksgiving is a time for family. A time for togetherness. A time for… tech?
The promise of the Internet of Things (IoT) is that devices, gadgets, and appliances we use every day will be able to communicate with one another. This potential is not limited to household items or smartphones, but also things we find in our yard and garden, as evidenced by a recent challenge from the element14 design community.
Researchers have developed a new flexible fabric that integrates both movement and sensors, introducing new potential for technology-embedded clothing and soft robots.
Made by Monkeys highlights products that somehow slipped by the QC cops.
If you didn't realize that PowerPoint presentations are inherently hilarious, you have to see Don McMillan take one apart. McMillan -- aka the Technically Funny Comic -- worked for 10 years as an engineer before he switched to stand-up comedy.
More:Blogs|News
Design News Webinar Series
11/19/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
11/6/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
10/7/2014 8:00 a.m. California / 11:00 a.m. New York
12/11/2014 8:00 a.m. California / 11:00 a.m. New York
Quick Poll
The Continuing Education Center offers engineers an entirely new way to get the education they need to formulate next-generation solutions.
Dec 1 - 5, An Introduction to Embedded Software Architecture and Design
SEMESTERS: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6


Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.
Last Archived Class
Sponsored by Littelfuse
Learn More   |   Login   |   Archived Classes
Twitter Feed
Design News Twitter Feed
Like Us on Facebook

Sponsored Content

Technology Marketplace

Copyright © 2014 UBM Canon, A UBM company, All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service