HOME  |  NEWS  |  BLOGS  |  MESSAGES  |  FEATURES  |  VIDEOS  |  WEBINARS  |  INDUSTRIES  |  FOCUS ON FUNDAMENTALS
  |  REGISTER  |  LOGIN  |  HELP
Comments
View Comments: Newest First|Oldest First|Threaded View
apresher
User Rank
Blogger
Operator Convergence
apresher   9/19/2013 9:24:26 AM
NO RATINGS
Chuck, It makes sense, especially in highly automated environments, that one skilled operator would be able to monitor multiple machines.

Charles Murray
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Convergence at Operator
Charles Murray   9/17/2013 6:31:13 PM
NO RATINGS
According to the people I'm talking to in the auto industry, more generalists (to use Nancy's definition) are needed. I keep hearing how one person is now replacing three by being able to operate muiltiple machines.

apresher
User Rank
Blogger
Convergence at Operator
apresher   9/17/2013 3:00:59 PM
NO RATINGS
Nancy, In this context, generalist means an operator that also has experience with other machines on the line. The theory is that this helps develop a better understanding and appreciation for the entire process.

Nancy Golden
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Generalist = More Productivity
Nancy Golden   9/16/2013 8:59:09 PM
NO RATINGS
Charles, I think the terms need to be redefined - a generalist can be an operator but an operator is not necessarily a generalist... 

Operator: a person who operates a machine, apparatus, or the like: a telegraph operator.

Generalist: a person whose knowledge, aptitudes, and skills are applied to a field as a whole.

Source: dictionary.com

Charles Murray
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Generalist = More Productivity
Charles Murray   9/16/2013 8:14:24 PM
NO RATINGS
I agree, Nancy. This is one more reason why we keep hearing manufacturers talk about the need for better-trained operators.

apresher
User Rank
Blogger
Operators Convergence
apresher   9/16/2013 1:21:54 PM
NO RATINGS
Naperlou, I agree that this is primarily a future development but a strong direction for future machines. And operators will definitely need to be more computer savvy.

Nancy Golden
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Generalist = More Productivity
Nancy Golden   9/16/2013 11:07:40 AM
NO RATINGS
naperlou, your comment "Of course, this means that you will need better trained personnel" was also my first thought. It really takes the operator task to a completely different level and calls for different skill sets.

From what is being described (if I understand it correctly), the decision-making process for complex processes is being incorporated into the operator function rather than the more functional roles of the past that required a separate engineering response under certain conditions. Of course additional education for a redefined role would normally require increase in pay rates, yet from what is being described, the programmer/engineering function would still be needed, they would just be somewhat freed up for other tasks.

It sounds to me like what we have in a traditional semiconductor manufacturer environment. From my personal experience, I would usually see an engineer assigned a product line with one or two technicians working for him. The techs are usually very sharp and can perform many of the jobs that fall under the engineer's tasks, and often know the products better since they work closely with them on a daily basis. They have received training at a tech school or extensive hands on experience in order to be able to perform their tasks, and their pay grade is above an operator that runs the tests sets that tests the products. We wouldn't ask a tech to run a test set - it wouldn't be cost effective. And we wouldn't ask an operator to make decisions that they were not trained for.

I'm not sure how this would all play out in an automated high capacity manufacturing environment since I have no direct experience with that - but it seems to me that while on the surface the generalist idea may be a good one, the proposed paradigm would be costly to implement and would in fact, cause jobs to be lost for a strata of manufacturing that have valuable skill sets (operators) but may not have the potential or aspiration for the technical training that would be required.

TJ McDermott
User Rank
Blogger
Leading the pack
TJ McDermott   9/16/2013 10:27:56 AM
NO RATINGS
B&R doesn't have a large penetration into US market, but they are out in front with tablet-style operator interfaces.

The interface that an operator can carry around a machine is going to be common in the years to come.

Not only can the operator take it where it needs to be, it can be removed and stored in a safe place when the cleaning crew comes through on third shift.

naperlou
User Rank
Blogger
Generalist = More Productivity
naperlou   9/16/2013 9:24:23 AM
NO RATINGS
Al, this seems to be another move toward the flexible manufacturing cell.  This is something that has been coming for a long time.  Actually, there are many implementations, but I do not think it is a majority.  Of course, this means that you will need better trained personnel. 

I can also see an integration with Big Data resources.  This would allow the people on the line to see and respond to changes as they occur. 



Partner Zone
Latest Analysis
The engineers and inventors of the post WWII period turned their attention to advancements in electronics, communication, and entertainment. Breakthrough inventions range from LEGOs and computer gaming to the integrated circuit and Ethernet -- a range of advancements that have little in common except they changed our lives.
The age of touch could soon come to an end. From smartphones and smartwatches, to home devices, to in-car infotainment systems, touch is no longer the primary user interface. Technology market leaders are driving a migration from touch to voice as a user interface.
Soft starter technology has become a way to mitigate startup stressors by moderating a motor’s voltage supply during the machine start-up phase, slowly ramping it up and effectively adjusting the machine’s load behavior to protect mechanical components.
A new report from the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) makes a start on developing control schemes, process measurements, and modeling and simulation methods for powder bed fusion additive manufacturing.
If you’re developing a product with lots of sensors and no access to the power grid, then you’ll want to take note of a Design News Continuing Education Center class, “Designing Low Power Systems Using Battery and Energy Harvesting Energy Sources."
More:Blogs|News
Design News Webinar Series
3/31/2015 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
2/25/2015 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
12/11/2014 8:00 a.m. California / 11:00 a.m. New York
5/7/2015 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
Quick Poll
The Continuing Education Center offers engineers an entirely new way to get the education they need to formulate next-generation solutions.
May 4 - 8, Designing Low Power Systems using Battery and Energy Harvesting Energy Sources
SEMESTERS: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6 |  7


Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.
Last Archived Class
Sponsored by Proto Labs
Learn More   |   Login   |   Archived Classes
Twitter Feed
Design News Twitter Feed
Like Us on Facebook

Sponsored Content

Technology Marketplace

Copyright © 2015 UBM Canon, A UBM company, All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service