Ann, this is an inevitable result for many "new" industries. Of course, photo-voltaics are not really new. In the 1970s I had a good friend who went to work at Solarex when he got his BS in Physics. Recent government support is what has really pushed the industry forward. In China, the target of 35 GW seems large, but that is 35 nuclear reactors. Of course, that capacity does not mean that 25 GW of conventional power are reaplced. I wonder if they will really meet that target. Keep us posted.
Lou, you're certainly right that PV solar isn't exactly a new industry. OTOH, this pattern looks familiar, doesn't it? Oversupply followed by consolidation happen and have happened in several industries at various times during their lifecycles. Glad you appreciated the report. I've got more coming on the status of solar and wind in various parts of the world.
The creation of such a huge amount of production capability, when the market was really not going to support it, is indicative of folks believing all of those claims by top level management that the market is going to be "huge", with those assertions based on nothing more than wishful thinking. What else could those folks possibly say, given that they must produce sunshine in order to keep the shareholders and the boards of directors happy?
The result has been that while some of the organizations were producing solar cells and modules of good quality, others were producing poor copies that would not last, but that could be sold for less to buyers who only considered price and not quality.
Those companies that produced the better quality products did experience production cost reductions to some extent, as their processing matured, so they were able to drop prices a bit, but of course the profit margine suffered because they had competition that did not spend the money on quality concerns.
As for actual dumping, that would have to be supported by some other group, such as the government, or somebody else? Or is it just that the margins got really thin?
But it all comes back to greed, rushing to grab a market that somebody thought existed, without an adequate understanding of where it really was headed.
But I wonder about the ability to redirect those production facilities toward the production of LED devices, which have a more assured future at this time.
China has made their bed, now they must sleep in it. Blind over-production without any regard to actual demands resulting in shameless dumping into the international markets without any consideration for mutually (underscoring this word, mutually) beneficial relations to all countries has created a predictable outcome. Consolidation is a normal and natural result in most new markets as the weak, brash or generally unwise fall away. If government incentives close your business case, you're already dead.
The Chinese government was giving Chinese solar companies money to cover the difference of cost of the solar panels, (not loans, but money free-and-clear) so they could rid the world of their competitors by flooding the market with cheap solar panels. It was by design, and this caused a huge problem for American companies as well as European companies, and many of them folded. Good to see that some regulation is taking place to prevent these unfair business practices. Now it looks like they have to do business like the rest of the world, and they are now trying to figure out how to still turn a profit while on an even playing field.
What the China government should do now is buy all of those cheap solar arrays and use them for power generation right there in Cina. Much less pollution and they can keep on being so very modern. Really, they do need more generation capacity and solar cells is a way for them to go, and if they are made right there, much less shipping costs.But if the arrays are junk and fail in a few years then better their problem than our problem.
To clarify, the oversupply problem was temporary, and "dumping" doesn't mean getting rid of unused or unusable products. It means an unfair trade practice: selling usable products in a given local market (such as Europe) at prices below their production cost and/or at a cost so low and in such volumes that the local vendors can't compete. Metrics to determine what constitutes dumping have been determined, and the numbers cited by the EC exceed those thresholds. This all involves an attempt at dominance of an existing market, such as solar in Europe. Historical examples include the Japanese and Koreans with DRAMs in the late 80s and early 90s.
Ann, my main point is that if there are quality problems with the solar cells we are better off if those stay in China and get used by their utilities. Then nobody else has to deal with poor quality. And one more thing is that the China government deals way more harshly with people that cause it problems than any free world government does. Over here in the US we just don't hear about business executives being executed for corruption, but it made headlines twice while I was there a few years back. I think that might be a more effective deterrant than what our government does.
In many engineering workplaces, there’s a generational conflict between recent engineering graduates and older, more experienced engineers. However, a recent study published in the psychology journal Cognition suggests that both may have something to learn from another group: 4 year olds.
Conventional wisdom holds that MIT, Cal Tech, and Stanford are three of the country’s best undergraduate engineering schools. Unfortunately, when conventional wisdom visits the topic of best engineering schools, it too often leaves out some of the most distinguished programs that don’t happen to offer PhD-level degrees.
Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.