HOME  |  NEWS  |  BLOGS  |  MESSAGES  |  FEATURES  |  VIDEOS  |  WEBINARS  |  INDUSTRIES  |  FOCUS ON FUNDAMENTALS
  |  REGISTER  |  LOGIN  |  HELP
Comments
View Comments: Newest First|Oldest First|Threaded View
<<  <  Page 2/3  >  >>
taimoortariq
User Rank
Gold
Re: Too Quick to Blame
taimoortariq   9/7/2013 12:25:37 AM
NO RATINGS
I agree William, actually that insight is a product of both education and experience and comes with time. So it is actually quite normal as well for the technicians to come up with the solution or debugging the problem better then engineer who has just joined the company. We can not just put a label directly based on the rank of the profession.

AnandY
User Rank
Gold
Re;perfect designs, simple problems
AnandY   9/4/2013 2:32:11 AM
NO RATINGS
In my experience (and am sure you have experienced this too if you engineer in any field) the simplest flaws are always the most difficult to spot in a great design. I think its because we are never quite sure that we got everything as we hoped and when we do so and the design doesn't work we never spot the most obvious problems

Rob Spiegel
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Too Quick to Blame
Rob Spiegel   9/3/2013 3:47:43 PM
NO RATINGS
Good point, Chuck. On first appearance, it would seem the robot is messing up -- after all, that's where the trouble is occurring.

apresher
User Rank
Blogger
Blame Game
apresher   9/3/2013 3:19:35 PM
NO RATINGS
BrainiacV, I agree that the most complex (or what is viewed as complex) always seems to get the majority of the attention when something goes wrong.

BrainiacV
User Rank
Platinum
Computers get the blame
BrainiacV   9/3/2013 2:54:46 PM
NO RATINGS
My experience has been that once you connect a computer to something, it is percieved that only the computer can fail.

I used to do computer controlled conveyor systems.  My programming partner had to fly halfway across the US because one of our installations had stopped working.

Nobody bothered to check the fuses.

 

And to go off on a mini rant, the computers were expected to overcome all hardware deficiencies. For the most part, we did, but when things failed, we got the blame.

I can relate to the programmers getting the blame for Denver airport, I knew all along it had to be a hardware problem even though the press was full of failed software design stories. Just because the motors start and the product moves, does not mean it is a control issue.

William K.
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Too Quick to Blame
William K.   9/3/2013 10:06:36 AM
NO RATINGS
As is usually the case, it is the individual with the greatest insight into the system who is able to solve the problem most effectively. Sometimes other get lucky and happen to arrive at the correct answer, and on rare occasions the solution is so obvious that a manager could see it. But usually it is the individual with the most accirate and complete insight who comes up with the solution.

GlennA
User Rank
Gold
Re: Too Quick to Blame
GlennA   9/1/2013 10:16:08 AM
NO RATINGS
I find it interesting that many posts suggest that the Engineer is the person that supposedly knows or finds the root cause. As an Automation Technician, I have often been in the position of having to troubleshoot to find the actual root cause, often having to prove the Engineer's guess to be wrong. And that annoys the Engineer.

shehan
User Rank
Gold
Re: Error Accumilation
shehan   8/31/2013 11:58:00 AM
NO RATINGS
@taimoortariq – Well explained the input instructions and on time component is vital for the robot to perform its task successfully. We cannot blame the robot because it's just another machine and cannot think by its self. 

shehan
User Rank
Gold
Re: Too Quick to Blame
shehan   8/31/2013 11:56:28 AM
NO RATINGS
@taimoortariq – yes an engineer has more knowledge then a technician hence we expect the engineer to understand the problem before coming to a conclusion.

shehan
User Rank
Gold
Re: Too Quick to Blame
shehan   8/31/2013 11:54:57 AM
NO RATINGS
@tekochip- yes sometimes we don't see what the problem is, instead we just start fixing and replacing components. Whereas like you said the problem might be quite small.

<<  <  Page 2/3  >  >>


Partner Zone
Latest Analysis
Advertised as the "Most Powerful Tablet Under $100," the Kindle Fire HD 6 was too tempting for the team at iFixit to pass up. Join us to find out if inexpensive means cheap, irreparable, or just down right economical. It's teardown time!
The first photos made with a 3D-printed telescope are here and they're not as fuzzy as you might expect. A team from the University of Sheffield beat NASA to the goal. The photos of the Moon were made with a reflecting telescope that cost the research team 100 to make (about $161 US).
At Medical Design & Manufacturing Midwest, Joe Wascow told Design News how Optimal Design prototyped a machine that captures the wing-beat of a duck.
The increased adoption of wireless technology for mission-critical applications has revved up the global market for dynamic electronic general purpose (GP) test equipment. As the link between cloud networks and devices -- smartphones, tablets, and notebooks -- results in more complex devices under test, the demand for radio frequency test equipment is starting to intensify.
Much of the research on lithium-ion batteries is focused on how to make the batteries charge more quickly and last longer than they currently do, work that would significantly improve the experience of mobile device users, as well EV and hybrid car drivers. Researchers in Singapore have come up with what seems like the best solution so far -- a battery that can recharge itself in mere minutes and has a potential lifespan of 20 years.
More:Blogs|News
Design News Webinar Series
10/7/2014 8:00 a.m. California / 11:00 a.m. New York
9/25/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
9/10/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
7/23/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
Quick Poll
The Continuing Education Center offers engineers an entirely new way to get the education they need to formulate next-generation solutions.
Oct 20 - 24, How to Design & Build an Embedded Web Server: An Embedded TCP/IP Tutorial
SEMESTERS: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6


Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.
Next Class: 10/28-10/30 11:00 AM
Sponsored by Stratasys
Next Class: 10/28-10/30 2:00 PM
Sponsored by Gates Corporation
Next Class: 11/11-11/13 2:00 PM
Sponsored by Littelfuse
Learn More   |   Login   |   Archived Classes
Twitter Feed
Design News Twitter Feed
Like Us on Facebook

Sponsored Content

Technology Marketplace

Copyright © 2014 UBM Canon, A UBM company, All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service