HOME  |  NEWS  |  BLOGS  |  MESSAGES  |  FEATURES  |  VIDEOS  |  WEBINARS  |  INDUSTRIES  |  FOCUS ON FUNDAMENTALS
  |  REGISTER  |  LOGIN  |  HELP
Comments
View Comments: Newest First|Oldest First|Threaded View
<<  <  Page 2/4  >  >>
Debera Harward
User Rank
Silver
Re: How to get it right the first time.
Debera Harward   9/3/2013 4:11:58 PM
NO RATINGS
William, thats absolutely correct its total team work . No idea or product can be successfull unless you have worked like a team all the failed products are the example of bad teamwork or no team work. As it is said that you should not love your idea its really a very good line . One should be flexible enough to make changes in his or her project because the ultimate thing that someone wants is the result and in order to drive good result we should have the stamina to discuss  ideas with others and have the courage to listen positive and negative points of it and revamp our project accordingly.

Tom Kramer
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Design Discipline
Tom Kramer   9/3/2013 2:37:22 PM
NO RATINGS
Scott, I agree, and your point is an important one. There are smaller projects that may not need much research at all at the get go. We always think in terms of what the project really needs, and scaling the efforts to meet the needs. beleive me, it is a lot harder to talk a customer into doing more research than it is to talk them into less!

ScotCan
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Design Discipline
ScotCan   9/3/2013 2:06:17 PM
NO RATINGS
Point taken Tom...I suppose it depends on the scale of the idea. Experience in Aerospace Liaison Engineering has shown that despite all the talent in the world there are still so many nonconformances that show up in a new airplane that an army of Liaison guys are hired to disposition fixes both in Design and in Manufacturing.

In contrast a novelty bicycle design has a vast history behind it, millions of bike examples out there and lends itself to creative sculpting which doesn't interfere with fit, form or function.

I reckon that a singular approach does not fit all circumstances and requires modification to suit.

GlennA
User Rank
Gold
Re: How to get it right the first time.
GlennA   9/3/2013 12:32:30 PM
NO RATINGS
William K;  Well said.  A group of qualified people who are interested in the success of the project, rather than self-aggrandizing or empire-building, are essential to the success of the team, and the project.

JimT@Future-Product-Innovations
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Orderly design process - fail
JimT@Future-Product-Innovations   9/3/2013 12:17:17 PM
NO RATINGS
I also work by another paradigm, in line with your thoughts here:  I ask my clients as they kick-off projects, "What is most important to you in developing this idea into a product for production-?"

1.       Time to Market

2.       High Quality

3.       Low Cost

Pick TWO, as all three are considered mutually exclusive.

Tom Kramer
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Design Discipline
Tom Kramer   9/3/2013 12:13:10 PM
NO RATINGS
Scott, the thing I have seen with "the prototype is enough" thinking is an excessive use of time and resources. What people tend to forget is that some good design thinking has to happen in order for you to get a prototype in the first place. Those who buy into this philosophy tend to espouse the "fail early fail often" mantra. I believe more in "fail early, fail often, fail smart". This simply means that with some simple informed design thinking up front, you may only have to build three prototypes to get to the final design instead of seven.

JimT@Future-Product-Innovations
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Design Review
JimT@Future-Product-Innovations   9/3/2013 12:12:35 PM
NO RATINGS
Did you have posted on the wall the (6) phases of a project?

1.       Blue Sky enthusiasm

2.       Reality check

3.       Painful long days

4.       Panic

5.       Punishment of the hard-working

6.       Praise & Glory for the Non-participants

JimT@Future-Product-Innovations
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Design Discipline
JimT@Future-Product-Innovations   9/3/2013 12:08:55 PM
NO RATINGS
I'm Designer AND Engineer, and I have often gone straight to prototype. It's the fastest and most fun route.  But in retrospect, the projects that do allow peer review always have Value-Added.  (Two heads are better than One). 

JimT@Future-Product-Innovations
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Design Discipline
JimT@Future-Product-Innovations   9/3/2013 12:07:05 PM
NO RATINGS
There is much to be said for the value of following a well-defined process, as a program routes it way thru other disciplines (Marketing, Legal, Agency, etc.) These three depts., for example, have no clue of the design details and need a process to lean on.

Tom Kramer
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Orderly design process - fail
Tom Kramer   9/3/2013 12:07:04 PM
NO RATINGS
It seems like the main difference of opinion here is whether or not there is time to do a thoughtful job of upfront research. A friend of mine has a grandfather who always said, "the hurrieder you go, the behinder you get". Another friend has always said, ''There is never enough time to do it right, but there is always enough time to do it over". I think there is a lot of wisdom in these sayings.

It doesn't need to take an immense amount of time to do up front research. If a company bails on it because they think it will take 3 months and 150k, there are other options. We have done short research projects for customers in just a week. The benefit is that the design team (engineers and designers) get to work with what I call "A Priori" knowledge... they can design in an informed way, knowing a bit better about what the design "needs" to be.

<<  <  Page 2/4  >  >>


Partner Zone
Latest Analysis
In this new Design News feature, "How it Works," we’re starting off by examining the inner workings of the electronic cigarette. While e-cigarettes seemed like a gimmick just two or three years ago, they’re catching fire -- so to speak. Sales topped $1 billion last year and are set to hit $10 billion by 2017. Cigarette companies are fighting back by buying up e-cigarette manufacturers.
Microchip recently released the 3D TouchPad, the first USB PC Peripheral device that couples 2D multi-touch input with 3D air gesture technology. The company seeks the help of developers to further enhance the capabilities of the technology.
Made by Monkeys highlights products that somehow slipped by the QC cops.
To give engineers a better idea of the range of resins and polymers available as alternatives to other materials, this Technology Roundup presents several articles on engineering plastics that can do the job.
Mac Cameron of Stratasys describes the company’s Connex3 technology, which allows users to 3D-print complex parts in one build with no assembly required.
More:Blogs|News
Design News Webinar Series
10/7/2014 8:00 a.m. California / 11:00 a.m. New York
9/25/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
9/10/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
7/23/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
Quick Poll
The Continuing Education Center offers engineers an entirely new way to get the education they need to formulate next-generation solutions.
Oct 20 - 24, How to Design & Build an Embedded Web Server: An Embedded TCP/IP Tutorial
SEMESTERS: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6


Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.
Next Class: 10/28-10/30 11:00 AM
Sponsored by Stratasys
Next Class: 10/28-10/30 2:00 PM
Sponsored by Gates Corporation
Next Class: 11/11-11/13 2:00 PM
Sponsored by Littelfuse
Learn More   |   Login   |   Archived Classes
Twitter Feed
Design News Twitter Feed
Like Us on Facebook

Sponsored Content

Technology Marketplace

Copyright © 2014 UBM Canon, A UBM company, All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service