HOME  |  NEWS  |  BLOGS  |  MESSAGES  |  FEATURES  |  VIDEOS  |  WEBINARS  |  INDUSTRIES  |  FOCUS ON FUNDAMENTALS
  |  REGISTER  |  LOGIN  |  HELP
Comments
View Comments: Newest First|Oldest First|Threaded View
<<  <  Page 2/2
GlennA
User Rank
Gold
Re: trouble shooting on the shop floor...
GlennA   8/13/2013 9:14:54 PM
NO RATINGS
Thinking J;  I agree that asking the operator, or previous technician, why they think there is a problem, what they think the problem is, and what they have done to diagnose, or to fix, the problem, is time well spent.  Sometimes the 'problem' is an attempted fix to a non-existent problem.

GlennA
User Rank
Gold
Re: Bad Timing...
GlennA   8/13/2013 9:03:00 PM
NO RATINGS
Ralphy Boy;  ABB called their robot programming language ARLa; A Robot Language.  I don't remember what Motoman called their programming language.  Early robots used G-code, which I think is now entirely replaced by plain language type programming languages.  Instead of a G-code move command, the syntax is usually something like  'MoveL' for a linear move, or 'MoveJ' for a joint move. 

GlennA
User Rank
Gold
Re: Was it tested?
GlennA   8/13/2013 8:54:52 PM
NO RATINGS
Naperlou;  This was probably a Motoman - this story is several years old.  Most of the robots were Motoman, either L100's or K100's, and one K6, but there were also two ABB IRB 60's, a Miller, a GMF S-420-F, and an ACMA.  The robot had been moved from one building to another, and the workcell had been modified to allow 2 tooling fixtures.  The 'programmer' (and this is a sore point) was a manager who fancied himself a 'robotic welding expert'.  I had several disagreements with the 'experts' during my (short) tenure at Matsu.  It is not unusual to have marginally qualified people program robots - one of the selling 'features' is how easy a robot is to program.  Robots are easy to program, but not easy to program well.

Thinking_J
User Rank
Platinum
trouble shooting on the shop floor...
Thinking_J   8/13/2013 6:51:22 PM
NO RATINGS
Glen did what I have always advocated... spend the time observing the machine AND the operator before taking any other action(s).

Often taking time to review the situation with a good knowledgeable operator is the best usage of time. Bad operators on the other hand...

 

 

Ralphy Boy
User Rank
Platinum
Bad Timing...
Ralphy Boy   8/13/2013 5:21:00 PM
NO RATINGS
Glenn... When working with CNC code generating software is common to have a 'post processor' that takes the general instructions from the GUI CAM screen and writes it as machine/controller specific code.

It looks like this is what you are referring to, or was it the onboard machine code that reads that that was modified?

Either way, I've done some post processor writing and I know that it is easy to miss something such as what you described... and not always easy to debug it later. It's the randomness of the problem you were up against that makes it tough puzzle.

Good on you for picking it out.

Debera Harward
User Rank
Silver
Re: Was it tested?
Debera Harward   8/13/2013 7:25:11 AM
NO RATINGS
Glenn thats really very nice ,i am highly impressed with your analytical and problem detection and solving skills.According to me a good engineer is not the one who just manufactures objects and products but he should have good analytical skills as well .

Charles Murray
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Random vs. pseudorandom
Charles Murray   8/12/2013 6:48:12 PM
NO RATINGS
Indeed, Dave. This looks like choice #2 -- "No one has taken the time to look for a pattern yet."

Dave Palmer
User Rank
Platinum
Random vs. pseudorandom
Dave Palmer   8/12/2013 1:50:04 PM
NO RATINGS
In manufacturing, any defect that's described as "random" just means "I haven't figured out the pattern yet," or maybe "I haven't taken the time to look for a pattern yet."

naperlou
User Rank
Blogger
Was it tested?
naperlou   8/12/2013 9:59:33 AM
NO RATINGS
Glenn, your analysis of and solution to the problem were really good.  You indicate that the robot had been reporgrammed site.  Was this the only robot of this type in use at that site?  What prompted the reprogramming?  From your description it seems that the customer had people who were not qualified programming the robot.  Is this the norm?

<<  <  Page 2/2


Partner Zone
Latest Analysis
Advertised as the "Most Powerful Tablet Under $100," the Kindle Fire HD 6 was too tempting for the team at iFixit to pass up. Join us to find out if inexpensive means cheap, irreparable, or just down right economical. It's teardown time!
The first photos made with a 3D-printed telescope are here and they're not as fuzzy as you might expect. A team from the University of Sheffield beat NASA to the goal. The photos of the Moon were made with a reflecting telescope that cost the research team 100 to make (about $161 US).
At Medical Design & Manufacturing Midwest, Joe Wascow told Design News how Optimal Design prototyped a machine that captures the wing-beat of a duck.
The increased adoption of wireless technology for mission-critical applications has revved up the global market for dynamic electronic general purpose (GP) test equipment. As the link between cloud networks and devices -- smartphones, tablets, and notebooks -- results in more complex devices under test, the demand for radio frequency test equipment is starting to intensify.
Much of the research on lithium-ion batteries is focused on how to make the batteries charge more quickly and last longer than they currently do, work that would significantly improve the experience of mobile device users, as well EV and hybrid car drivers. Researchers in Singapore have come up with what seems like the best solution so far -- a battery that can recharge itself in mere minutes and has a potential lifespan of 20 years.
More:Blogs|News
Design News Webinar Series
10/7/2014 8:00 a.m. California / 11:00 a.m. New York
9/25/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
9/10/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
7/23/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
Quick Poll
The Continuing Education Center offers engineers an entirely new way to get the education they need to formulate next-generation solutions.
Oct 20 - 24, How to Design & Build an Embedded Web Server: An Embedded TCP/IP Tutorial
SEMESTERS: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6


Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.
Next Class: 10/28-10/30 11:00 AM
Sponsored by Stratasys
Next Class: 10/28-10/30 2:00 PM
Sponsored by Gates Corporation
Next Class: 11/11-11/13 2:00 PM
Sponsored by Littelfuse
Learn More   |   Login   |   Archived Classes
Twitter Feed
Design News Twitter Feed
Like Us on Facebook

Sponsored Content

Technology Marketplace

Copyright © 2014 UBM Canon, A UBM company, All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service