HOME  |  NEWS  |  BLOGS  |  MESSAGES  |  FEATURES  |  VIDEOS  |  WEBINARS  |  INDUSTRIES  |  FOCUS ON FUNDAMENTALS
  |  REGISTER  |  LOGIN  |  HELP
Comments
View Comments: Newest First|Oldest First|Threaded View
<<  <  Page 2/2
GlennA
User Rank
Gold
Re: trouble shooting on the shop floor...
GlennA   8/13/2013 9:14:54 PM
NO RATINGS
Thinking J;  I agree that asking the operator, or previous technician, why they think there is a problem, what they think the problem is, and what they have done to diagnose, or to fix, the problem, is time well spent.  Sometimes the 'problem' is an attempted fix to a non-existent problem.

GlennA
User Rank
Gold
Re: Bad Timing...
GlennA   8/13/2013 9:03:00 PM
NO RATINGS
Ralphy Boy;  ABB called their robot programming language ARLa; A Robot Language.  I don't remember what Motoman called their programming language.  Early robots used G-code, which I think is now entirely replaced by plain language type programming languages.  Instead of a G-code move command, the syntax is usually something like  'MoveL' for a linear move, or 'MoveJ' for a joint move. 

GlennA
User Rank
Gold
Re: Was it tested?
GlennA   8/13/2013 8:54:52 PM
NO RATINGS
Naperlou;  This was probably a Motoman - this story is several years old.  Most of the robots were Motoman, either L100's or K100's, and one K6, but there were also two ABB IRB 60's, a Miller, a GMF S-420-F, and an ACMA.  The robot had been moved from one building to another, and the workcell had been modified to allow 2 tooling fixtures.  The 'programmer' (and this is a sore point) was a manager who fancied himself a 'robotic welding expert'.  I had several disagreements with the 'experts' during my (short) tenure at Matsu.  It is not unusual to have marginally qualified people program robots - one of the selling 'features' is how easy a robot is to program.  Robots are easy to program, but not easy to program well.

Thinking_J
User Rank
Platinum
trouble shooting on the shop floor...
Thinking_J   8/13/2013 6:51:22 PM
NO RATINGS
Glen did what I have always advocated... spend the time observing the machine AND the operator before taking any other action(s).

Often taking time to review the situation with a good knowledgeable operator is the best usage of time. Bad operators on the other hand...

 

 

Ralphy Boy
User Rank
Platinum
Bad Timing...
Ralphy Boy   8/13/2013 5:21:00 PM
NO RATINGS
Glenn... When working with CNC code generating software is common to have a 'post processor' that takes the general instructions from the GUI CAM screen and writes it as machine/controller specific code.

It looks like this is what you are referring to, or was it the onboard machine code that reads that that was modified?

Either way, I've done some post processor writing and I know that it is easy to miss something such as what you described... and not always easy to debug it later. It's the randomness of the problem you were up against that makes it tough puzzle.

Good on you for picking it out.

Debera Harward
User Rank
Silver
Re: Was it tested?
Debera Harward   8/13/2013 7:25:11 AM
NO RATINGS
Glenn thats really very nice ,i am highly impressed with your analytical and problem detection and solving skills.According to me a good engineer is not the one who just manufactures objects and products but he should have good analytical skills as well .

Charles Murray
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Random vs. pseudorandom
Charles Murray   8/12/2013 6:48:12 PM
NO RATINGS
Indeed, Dave. This looks like choice #2 -- "No one has taken the time to look for a pattern yet."

Dave Palmer
User Rank
Platinum
Random vs. pseudorandom
Dave Palmer   8/12/2013 1:50:04 PM
NO RATINGS
In manufacturing, any defect that's described as "random" just means "I haven't figured out the pattern yet," or maybe "I haven't taken the time to look for a pattern yet."

naperlou
User Rank
Blogger
Was it tested?
naperlou   8/12/2013 9:59:33 AM
NO RATINGS
Glenn, your analysis of and solution to the problem were really good.  You indicate that the robot had been reporgrammed site.  Was this the only robot of this type in use at that site?  What prompted the reprogramming?  From your description it seems that the customer had people who were not qualified programming the robot.  Is this the norm?

<<  <  Page 2/2


Partner Zone
Latest Analysis
Bigger than an iPhone 6 Plus, but smaller than an iPad Air 2. What am I? If you answered iPad Mini 3, you are correct.
Here are 10 robots that are designed to work effectively and safely with humans.
The data breaches at Target, Home Depot, and elsewhere have inadvertently highlighted a separate and unexpected problem: bad user interface design.
What if you could recharge your mobile device using the movements you make all day? That’s the promise of Ampy, a new device by a Chicago-based startup of the same name.
Peter Riendeau of Melexis shows how a time-of-flight sensor can be used for gesture recognition in a vehicle.
More:Blogs|News
Design News Webinar Series
10/7/2014 8:00 a.m. California / 11:00 a.m. New York
9/25/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
9/10/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
7/23/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
Quick Poll
The Continuing Education Center offers engineers an entirely new way to get the education they need to formulate next-generation solutions.
Nov 3 - 7, Engineering Principles behind Advanced User Interface Technologies
SEMESTERS: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6


Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.
Last Archived Class
Sponsored by Littelfuse
Learn More   |   Login   |   Archived Classes
Twitter Feed
Design News Twitter Feed
Like Us on Facebook

Sponsored Content

Technology Marketplace

Copyright © 2014 UBM Canon, A UBM company, All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service