Actually, aluminum molds can easily accommodate 10's of thousands of shots – easily up to about 35k without any honing or refinishing, and are known to produce as many as 100,000 shots. So why don't more OEMs pursue the aluminum option-?
Several reasons: primarily , machining aluminum cavity blocks costs about 90% of the cost and effort of machining steel blocks (commonly used is P20 steel), and the steel lasts 10x longer in mold cycling (typically 500,000 to 1M). So for the price of Steel (about 10% more) an OEM gets about 10x the tool life. It's a bargain.
Also from the manufacturing perspectives, most tool-makers have discovered that machining carbon electrodes then using those electrodes to EDM burn the metal cavity geometry is actually more cost effective (in materials & machine time) than direct milling the cavities. EDM burning P20 steel is common, but I've never seen aluminum burned. (,,,,wonder if its lucrative, or even possible-?)
There are other Pro's and Cons, but one is BIG for Design Engineers: the part quality. Most parts will look OK in either aluminum or steel mold cavities, but for more complex, and especially thin-walled plastic parts, steel gives superior results, and holds better dimensional accuracy. I remember several programs where we prototyped using Aluminum tools and put molded parts into Environmental testing --- with terrible results. We learned we were wasted time, "Chasing Ghosts" – trying to resolve failure issues that cleared up when parts were molded with production tool steel.
One material option that I talked to a guy about is the mold. For lower production totals you can use aluminum. Produced on a CNC machine you could make a few hundred parts with it. This makes another interesting option for low rate manufacturing.
In a bid to boost the viability of lithium-based electric car batteries, a team at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory has developed a chemistry that could possibly double an EV’s driving range while cutting its battery cost in half.
Using Siemens NX software, a team of engineering students from the University of Michigan built an electric vehicle and raced in the 2013 Bridgestone World Solar Challenge. One of those students blogged for Design News throughout the race.
Robots that walk have come a long way from simple barebones walking machines or pairs of legs without an upper body and head. Much of the research these days focuses on making more humanoid robots. But they are not all created equal.
For industrial control applications, or even a simple assembly line, that machine can go almost 24/7 without a break. But what happens when the task is a little more complex? That’s where the “smart” machine would come in. The smart machine is one that has some simple (or complex in some cases) processing capability to be able to adapt to changing conditions. Such machines are suited for a host of applications, including automotive, aerospace, defense, medical, computers and electronics, telecommunications, consumer goods, and so on. This discussion will examine what’s possible with smart machines, and what tradeoffs need to be made to implement such a solution.