HOME  |  NEWS  |  BLOGS  |  MESSAGES  |  FEATURES  |  VIDEOS  |  WEBINARS  |  INDUSTRIES  |  FOCUS ON FUNDAMENTALS
  |  REGISTER  |  LOGIN  |  HELP
Comments
View Comments: Newest First|Oldest First|Threaded View
Page 1/7  >  >>
Rob Spiegel
User Rank
Blogger
Re: 3 levels to the plant
Rob Spiegel   8/29/2013 8:09:04 AM
NO RATINGS
Yes Ann, there seems to be a shift away from hierarchy a bit. Whether that would affect the potential success of TQM, I'm not sure.

Ann R. Thryft
User Rank
Blogger
Re: 3 levels to the plant
Ann R. Thryft   8/27/2013 4:36:48 PM
NO RATINGS
I think those are good questions, Rob. I don't think younger employees are less territorial, at least not in my experience. It's also true that in the plant in those days they certainly weren't in charge of departments, since that was before the great downsizing that eliminated the middle management layer. But I think one big factor that's changed is that there's more emphasis today on teams than on hierarchy--not that hierarchy doesn't exist but it seems to have moved up the pyramid a ways.

Rob Spiegel
User Rank
Blogger
Re: 3 levels to the plant
Rob Spiegel   8/27/2013 3:56:08 PM
NO RATINGS
I wonder if there is a generational aspect to that Ann. I wonder if you ng employees would be less territorial? I wonder if they would see more value in TQM.

Ann R. Thryft
User Rank
Blogger
Re: 3 levels to the plant
Ann R. Thryft   8/26/2013 1:15:44 PM
NO RATINGS
You're right, Rob. I wrote extensively about implementing TQM for awhile for CMP, including in-depth interviews with several companies that had tried and failed (as well as a few that tried and succeeded). But back then, those resistant "populations" were usually well over 50% of the company's employees.



Rob Spiegel
User Rank
Blogger
Re: 3 levels to the plant
Rob Spiegel   8/22/2013 3:45:44 PM
NO RATINGS
I believe TQM ran into problems with populations that were not convinced that changes would be improvements. The attitude seemed to be, "What on earth do you know about what we have to do? If it could be more efficient, we'd make it more efficient."

Ann R. Thryft
User Rank
Blogger
Re: 3 levels to the plant
Ann R. Thryft   8/21/2013 7:26:53 PM
NO RATINGS
That makes a lot of sense: the narrower goal. TQM required everybody in the whole plant to do everything entirely differently in all areas. It was pretty overwhelming. I can sure see how sacrificing uptime would be a no-op.



Rob Spiegel
User Rank
Blogger
Re: 3 levels to the plant
Rob Spiegel   8/21/2013 6:23:01 PM
NO RATINGS
It could be these groups are working because they have such a limited agenda -- network security. The only dispute -- and it can be a big one -- is that control doesn't want to sacrifice uptime.

Ann R. Thryft
User Rank
Blogger
Re: 3 levels to the plant
Ann R. Thryft   8/16/2013 1:04:26 PM
NO RATINGS
Wow, that's a very big change from the days of attempts at setting up TQM systems: it was very hard to implement TQM here in the US, and in fact there many failed attempts at many companies. So either that statement is a lot of wishful thinking, or something really is different. If so, I wonder what?



Rob Spiegel
User Rank
Blogger
Re: 3 levels to the plant
Rob Spiegel   8/12/2013 8:46:01 PM
NO RATINGS
If I remember these stories right, vendors like Rockwell and Siemens were involved in promoting these groups. I remember a Rockwell source shrugging it off, saying, "It's not that hard when you get everyone together."

Ann R. Thryft
User Rank
Blogger
Re: 3 levels to the plant
Ann R. Thryft   8/12/2013 6:31:33 PM
NO RATINGS
Rob, that's an amazing change and a long time coming. Hard to believe it's actually happened. I can believe that there's a goal like "taking the side of the company and not the side of control or IT." That reminds me a bit of TQM efforts years ago: it requires a huge change in corporate culture and is not easily done. Any idea how the actual change was implemented, not in the technology, but in people's behavior and minds?

Page 1/7  >  >>


Partner Zone
Latest Analysis
A bold, gold, open-air coupe may not be the ticket to automotive nirvana for every consumer, but Lexus’ LF-C2 concept car certainly turned heads at the recent Los Angeles Auto Show. What’s more, it may provide a glimpse of the luxury automaker’s future.
Perhaps you didn't know that there are a variety of classes, both live and archived, offered via the Design News Continuing Education Center (CEC) sponsored by Digi-Key? The best part – they are free!
Engineer comic Don McMillan explains the fun engineers have with team-building exercises. Can you relate?
The complexity of diesel engines means optimizing their performance requires a large amount of experimentation. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) is a very useful and intuitive tool in this, and cold flow analysis using CFD is an ideal approach to study the flow characteristics without going into the details of chemical reactions occurring during the combustion.
The damage to Sony from the cyber attack seems to have been heightened by failure to follow two basic security rules.
More:Blogs|News
Design News Webinar Series
12/11/2014 8:00 a.m. California / 11:00 a.m. New York
12/10/2014 8:00 a.m. California / 11:00 a.m. New York
11/19/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
11/6/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
Quick Poll
The Continuing Education Center offers engineers an entirely new way to get the education they need to formulate next-generation solutions.
Jan 12 - 16, Programmable Logic - How do they do that?
SEMESTERS: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  67


Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.
Learn More   |   Login   |   Archived Classes
Twitter Feed
Design News Twitter Feed
Like Us on Facebook

Sponsored Content

Technology Marketplace

Copyright © 2014 UBM Canon, A UBM company, All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service