HOME  |  NEWS  |  BLOGS  |  MESSAGES  |  FEATURES  |  VIDEOS  |  WEBINARS  |  INDUSTRIES  |  FOCUS ON FUNDAMENTALS
REGISTER   |   LOGIN   |   HELP
Comments
View Comments: Newest First|Oldest First|Threaded View
<<  <  Page 2/7  >  >>
Rob Spiegel
User Rank
Blogger
Re: 3 levels to the plant
Rob Spiegel   8/9/2013 7:52:04 PM
NO RATINGS
Ann, vendors from companies like Rockwell and Siemens say that this arrangement has effectively solved the problem of the conflict between control and IT. The goal apparently is for everyone to take the side of the company and not the side of control or IT.

Rob Spiegel
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Why does it have to be a war?
Rob Spiegel   8/5/2013 10:36:24 AM
NO RATINGS

Good point. But if that means shutting down the plant unscheduled, that can run into considerable dollars.

Digerati Ohm
User Rank
Silver
Re: Why does it have to be a war?
Digerati Ohm   8/5/2013 9:23:52 AM
NO RATINGS
Sometimes it is important to install patches in a timely manner, particularly if a new expoit is a zero day.  So it boils down to this:
A hacker or an exploit takes down your plant.  Who are the executives and shareholders going to lynch, IS or the plant management?  I can tell you it will be IS, and the argument will be that IS didn't explain the urgency clearly enough (which they did, but were ignored), and that IS is ultimately responsible for computer security.

Rob Spiegel
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Re-3 levels to the plant
Rob Spiegel   8/2/2013 7:35:53 PM
NO RATINGS
Cabe, this problem will grow as plants continue to shift to wireless devices. It's one thing to protect a wired network, but a wireless network is even more vulnerable. Wireless is attractive because is costs less and you can put a device in places where it's hard to run wire.

Rob Spiegel
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Why does it have to be a war?
Rob Spiegel   8/2/2013 7:19:53 PM
NO RATINGS
One of the clashes between control and IT is that IT wants to update the patches more often than control has scheduled downtime. So, to meet IT's desired updating, control would have to shut down the plant more often.

Cabe Atwell
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Re-3 levels to the plant
Cabe Atwell   7/31/2013 7:16:56 PM
NO RATINGS
No system is 100% safe even with safeguard protocols in place. I expect the problem to continue to grow as mobile devices become more powerful in terms of tech.

Rob Spiegel
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Re-3 levels to the plant
Rob Spiegel   7/26/2013 9:30:57 AM
NO RATINGS
I see your point, AnandY. The mandates of IT and control are absolute. For IT, no security breaches. For control, no downtime. I've heard vendors talk of peace between the two when a committee is set up to solve these issues and both IT and control are represented on the committee.

Digerati Ohm
User Rank
Silver
Re: Why does it have to be a war?
Digerati Ohm   7/26/2013 9:15:37 AM
NO RATINGS
At least when IT takes down services to install patches, it should be a scheduled maintenance period.  Hackers don't care about schedules.  I'd rather have a scheduled downtime to install patches than unscheduled downtime because I couldn't.  But as I read the article it emphasizes the trend that users are pushing technology into the work environment without understanding the implications.  IT must have time to evaluate the risk and do what they can to minimize it.  If it cannot be eliminated completely, IT needs to communicate their concerns to management.  Then, if management decides to sign off on the risks, IT has done their due dlilgence and responsibility now rests on management.  But again, IT must have time to research and test the technology in their environment.  This is no different than the standards of good manufacturing and design:  R&D and QC.

AnandY
User Rank
Gold
Re-3 levels to the plant
AnandY   7/26/2013 6:05:00 AM
NO RATINGS
 Working a truce between the IT and control department seems logical but I think it is more theoretical than practically possible. If the teams couldn't work out an understanding on their own I don't see how they will when sat down together on a round table. Their mantras dangle on the opposite sides of the seesaw thus for the prosperity of one the other will have to take a blow in the neck.

Rob Spiegel
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Why does it have to be a war?
Rob Spiegel   7/25/2013 8:20:24 PM
NO RATINGS
Point well taken, Digerati Ohm. But it works both ways. IT has to understand the plant can't shut down in order for IT to install a patch at 2:00 am. That works for the office PCs, but not for the plant PCs if the plant runs 24/7. I think both conrol and IT have an issue with outside devices. But often the clash between IT and control doesn't have anything to do woth outside devices. it has to do with conflicting mandates.

<<  <  Page 2/7  >  >>


Partner Zone
Latest Analysis
Made By Monkeys highlights products that somehow slipped by the QC cops.
A new web-based software tool aims to give engineers a fast, intuitive way to design circuit-protection systems for their electronic products.
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administrationís recent backup camera mandate could open the door to more vehicle innovations, including better graphical displays, 360-degree camera views, and the increased use of Ethernet.
With support from National Instruments, a group of dedicated students from Connally High School in Austin, where more than 50% of the students are at risk of not graduating, have created a successful robotics team that is competing in the FIRST World Championships.
Solar Impulse 2 -- a 100% solar-powered airplane -- has been completed. It features several advanced materials, some developed specifically for next year's attempted around-the-world flight.
More:Blogs|News
Design News Webinar Series
3/27/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York / 7:00 p.m. London
2/27/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York / 7:00 p.m. London
12/18/2013 Available On Demand
11/20/2013 Available On Demand
Quick Poll
The Continuing Education Center offers engineers an entirely new way to get the education they need to formulate next-generation solutions.
Apr 21 - 25, Creating & Testing Your First RTOS Application Using MQX
SEMESTERS: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5


Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.
Next Class: April 29 - Day 1
Sponsored by maxon precision motors
Learn More   |   Login   |   Archived Classes
Twitter Feed
Design News Twitter Feed
Like Us on Facebook

Sponsored Content

Technology Marketplace

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Copyright © 2014 UBM Canon, A UBM company, All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service