HOME  |  NEWS  |  BLOGS  |  MESSAGES  |  FEATURES  |  VIDEOS  |  WEBINARS  |  INDUSTRIES  |  FOCUS ON FUNDAMENTALS
  |  REGISTER  |  LOGIN  |  HELP
Comments
View Comments: Newest First|Oldest First|Threaded View
Page 1/7  >  >>
Rob Spiegel
User Rank
Blogger
Re: 3 levels to the plant
Rob Spiegel   8/29/2013 8:09:04 AM
NO RATINGS
Yes Ann, there seems to be a shift away from hierarchy a bit. Whether that would affect the potential success of TQM, I'm not sure.

Ann R. Thryft
User Rank
Blogger
Re: 3 levels to the plant
Ann R. Thryft   8/27/2013 4:36:48 PM
NO RATINGS
I think those are good questions, Rob. I don't think younger employees are less territorial, at least not in my experience. It's also true that in the plant in those days they certainly weren't in charge of departments, since that was before the great downsizing that eliminated the middle management layer. But I think one big factor that's changed is that there's more emphasis today on teams than on hierarchy--not that hierarchy doesn't exist but it seems to have moved up the pyramid a ways.

Rob Spiegel
User Rank
Blogger
Re: 3 levels to the plant
Rob Spiegel   8/27/2013 3:56:08 PM
NO RATINGS
I wonder if there is a generational aspect to that Ann. I wonder if you ng employees would be less territorial? I wonder if they would see more value in TQM.

Ann R. Thryft
User Rank
Blogger
Re: 3 levels to the plant
Ann R. Thryft   8/26/2013 1:15:44 PM
NO RATINGS
You're right, Rob. I wrote extensively about implementing TQM for awhile for CMP, including in-depth interviews with several companies that had tried and failed (as well as a few that tried and succeeded). But back then, those resistant "populations" were usually well over 50% of the company's employees.



Rob Spiegel
User Rank
Blogger
Re: 3 levels to the plant
Rob Spiegel   8/22/2013 3:45:44 PM
NO RATINGS
I believe TQM ran into problems with populations that were not convinced that changes would be improvements. The attitude seemed to be, "What on earth do you know about what we have to do? If it could be more efficient, we'd make it more efficient."

Ann R. Thryft
User Rank
Blogger
Re: 3 levels to the plant
Ann R. Thryft   8/21/2013 7:26:53 PM
NO RATINGS
That makes a lot of sense: the narrower goal. TQM required everybody in the whole plant to do everything entirely differently in all areas. It was pretty overwhelming. I can sure see how sacrificing uptime would be a no-op.



Rob Spiegel
User Rank
Blogger
Re: 3 levels to the plant
Rob Spiegel   8/21/2013 6:23:01 PM
NO RATINGS
It could be these groups are working because they have such a limited agenda -- network security. The only dispute -- and it can be a big one -- is that control doesn't want to sacrifice uptime.

Ann R. Thryft
User Rank
Blogger
Re: 3 levels to the plant
Ann R. Thryft   8/16/2013 1:04:26 PM
NO RATINGS
Wow, that's a very big change from the days of attempts at setting up TQM systems: it was very hard to implement TQM here in the US, and in fact there many failed attempts at many companies. So either that statement is a lot of wishful thinking, or something really is different. If so, I wonder what?



Rob Spiegel
User Rank
Blogger
Re: 3 levels to the plant
Rob Spiegel   8/12/2013 8:46:01 PM
NO RATINGS
If I remember these stories right, vendors like Rockwell and Siemens were involved in promoting these groups. I remember a Rockwell source shrugging it off, saying, "It's not that hard when you get everyone together."

Ann R. Thryft
User Rank
Blogger
Re: 3 levels to the plant
Ann R. Thryft   8/12/2013 6:31:33 PM
NO RATINGS
Rob, that's an amazing change and a long time coming. Hard to believe it's actually happened. I can believe that there's a goal like "taking the side of the company and not the side of control or IT." That reminds me a bit of TQM efforts years ago: it requires a huge change in corporate culture and is not easily done. Any idea how the actual change was implemented, not in the technology, but in people's behavior and minds?

Page 1/7  >  >>


Partner Zone
Latest Analysis
Take a peek into the world of a test engineer – and then tell us about yourself! We want to know what part each of our readers plays in the wonderful umbrella known as design engineering.
On Sunday, when more than a hundred million Americans turn on their televisions to watch the Super Bowl, they might consider first giving thanks to a polymer known as polybutadiene. .
Design News is pleased to present the finalists in the Design Tools - Hardware & Software category of our 2016 Golden Mousetrap Awards.
The series now can interface with a wider array of EtherNet/IP-compliant hardware across many industrial sectors, including factory automation systems, plastic injection molding apparatus, and materials-handling equipment.
Gadget freaks at the Pacific Design & Manufacturing Show in Anaheim next week are in for a special treat: a chance to participate in a slot car competition on the show floor.
More:Blogs|News
Design News Webinar Series
1/28/2016 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
12/8/2015 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
2/18/2016 11:00 AM PT | 2:00 PM ET
2/24/2016 11:00 AM PT | 2:00 PM ET
Quick Poll
The Continuing Education Center offers engineers an entirely new way to get the education they need to formulate next-generation solutions.
Jan 11 - 15, Designing ARM Devices Using Segger Tools
SEMESTERS: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6 |  7 | 8 | 9


Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.
Learn More   |   Login   |   Archived Classes
Twitter Feed
Design News Twitter Feed
Like Us on Facebook

Sponsored Content

Technology Marketplace

Copyright © 2016 UBM Canon, A UBM company, All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service