My guess is that the original collection of test stands was created as each different type of helicopter was designed, probably by the first builders of each model. It often happens that way. And so there is a collection of test stands, each representing a different approach to different requirements and built over a span of many years. Designing a different stand to test all of the models with a different set of requirements is a great idea, but it is quite different from what the first projects were. And as system requirements change a lot, the original systems are not able to meet the new requirements. Not bad engineering, just "long ago and different specifications" engineering. Change will bury us if we aren't careful.
Thanks for the interest and question. RedViking has developed a test stand control and software platform called RedRaven that incorporates a supervisory host system, PLC based machine function and safety control, high performance drive control, and integrated high speed data acquisition. The manufacturers of the hardware can very but in this case we integrated Rockwell AB PLCs, NI data acquisition hardware, and Siemens drives and Motor. The host system, which includes the HMI software, is all custom LabVIEW code.
I would have thought that the old system would have, at the least , had test pallets where the device under test could have been loaded, off the test stand, and then put on the test stand and the test stand connections quickly made.
It sounds like the original stands were made to maximize cost at the expense of efficientcy.
Truchard will be presented the award at the 2014 Golden Mousetrap Awards ceremony during the co-located events Pacific Design & Manufacturing, MD&M West, WestPack, PLASTEC West, Electronics West, ATX West, and AeroCon.
In a bid to boost the viability of lithium-based electric car batteries, a team at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory has developed a chemistry that could possibly double an EV’s driving range while cutting its battery cost in half.
For industrial control applications, or even a simple assembly line, that machine can go almost 24/7 without a break. But what happens when the task is a little more complex? That’s where the “smart” machine would come in. The smart machine is one that has some simple (or complex in some cases) processing capability to be able to adapt to changing conditions. Such machines are suited for a host of applications, including automotive, aerospace, defense, medical, computers and electronics, telecommunications, consumer goods, and so on. This discussion will examine what’s possible with smart machines, and what tradeoffs need to be made to implement such a solution.