HOME  |  NEWS  |  BLOGS  |  MESSAGES  |  FEATURES  |  VIDEOS  |  WEBINARS  |  INDUSTRIES  |  FOCUS ON FUNDAMENTALS
  |  REGISTER  |  LOGIN  |  HELP
Page 1/2  >  >>
Rob Spiegel
User Rank
Blogger
We're getting there
Rob Spiegel   5/15/2013 10:04:24 AM
NO RATINGS
Hey Rich, I agree we're getting there on the Internet of things. As more devices have connectivity, they naturally become part of the IoT. This happening more and more at plants these days, whether it's remote monitoring of devices or remote maintenance review. The first time I saw the concept was during the dot com days when dot com'ers were predicting a completely connected home. So far, that's not really necessary. But the concept took off in plants because connectivity can improve efficiency and improve optimization. That makes for real motivation.

Charles Murray
User Rank
Blogger
Re: We're getting there
Charles Murray   5/15/2013 6:49:14 PM
NO RATINGS
Rob, the first time I wrote about the Internet of Things I was with EE Times, and much of the talk centered on the home, as you suggested. The idea seems to have matured since then, but I think eventually we will come back to that concept.

Debera Harward
User Rank
Silver
Re: We're getting there
Debera Harward   5/16/2013 9:13:53 AM
NO RATINGS
Thanks Richard for reminding us about IOT. No doubt these days we are soo much dependant on it that we merely forget to think about it this is one of the great revolution in the industry . Initially there was a lot of hype of IOT but now this technology has grown up and is matured but with every advantage there is responsibility as well IOT conains alot of information with information there  is always security constraints .Security is the major flaw of this technology. If any of your information is present in it then it is very easy for any one to make conclusions about  you and get your information as well.

naperlou
User Rank
Blogger
taking it too far
naperlou   5/16/2013 10:42:05 AM
NO RATINGS
Rich, while the IoT is a very important and exciting area, which the silicon vendors do love, there is a tendency to take it too far some times.  In reality you won't have everything connected to everything.  Would you really want to?  By looking at the scale from the most extenive set of possible connections you come up with a system that is much too complex to be justified for the utility that is gained.  On the other hand, there are natural communities of things that, when connedted, give some useful result.  This might include the appliances in my house and the smart meter.

As an example of a non-useful connection, take a game controller and your clothes washer.  Even though someone may come up with some convoluted use for this, it is not really necessary or useful.

There was an interesting blog on the Freescale site regarding sensor fusion and the IoT.  This is where the real need for those 32-bit MCUs comes in.  That will be interesting to watch.

richnass
User Rank
Blogger
Re: We're getting there
richnass   5/16/2013 11:33:17 AM
NO RATINGS
Debera, regarding security, it depends on the application. There are many cases where I doubt anyone would hack in and I really don't caree if they do, and in these instances, I don't want to pay extra for extra security. For example, if my TV's remote was on the INternet, I doubt someone would be trying to hack in to change my channels. Obviously there are cases where this isn't true.

tekochip
User Rank
Platinum
Re: We're getting there
tekochip   5/16/2013 12:21:17 PM
NO RATINGS
The remote control is probably a bad example because I instantly thought that an evil network or sponsor would love to take control of your remote and prevent you from changing channels, mess with your volume or prevent you from muting during a particular commercial. Think of how websites already try hard to hijack your PC to do the same thing.
 
A local network, sure, but not everything needs global visibility.


TJ McDermott
User Rank
Blogger
There's a more familiar name
TJ McDermott   5/16/2013 12:24:36 PM
NO RATINGS
I didn't know the term IoT until this article.  The definition made me think it should be called:

Skynet

 

What about addressing?  If every "thing" will be connected, how are they being addressed?  Didn't we run out of IPv4 addresses several years ago, and IPv6 addressing would fix the problem?

Rob Spiegel
User Rank
Blogger
Re: We're getting there
Rob Spiegel   5/16/2013 12:52:48 PM
NO RATINGS
I think a lot of connectivity we're seeing -- often in the factory setting -- could be construed as a version of the Internet of Things. The term may be similar to "the cloud," where there were tons of instances of cloud computing before the term appeared.

richnass
User Rank
Blogger
Re: We're getting there
richnass   5/16/2013 1:58:34 PM
NO RATINGS
tekochip: You have some interesting ideas.

TJ: It's not necessarily everythig connected to everything. But it's the ability to connect to the thigs you want to connect to.

Debera Harward
User Rank
Silver
Re: We're getting there
Debera Harward   5/16/2013 2:48:58 PM
NO RATINGS
Richnaas you are absolutely correct but if there are cases where security is not required but there are also situations where security is essential . I didnt mean to offense you there are two cases.

Page 1/2  >  >>


Partner Zone
Latest Analysis
The engineers and inventors of the post WWII period turned their attention to advancements in electronics, communication, and entertainment. Breakthrough inventions range from LEGOs and computer gaming to the integrated circuit and Ethernet -- a range of advancements that have little in common except they changed our lives.
The age of touch could soon come to an end. From smartphones and smartwatches, to home devices, to in-car infotainment systems, touch is no longer the primary user interface. Technology market leaders are driving a migration from touch to voice as a user interface.
Soft starter technology has become a way to mitigate startup stressors by moderating a motor’s voltage supply during the machine start-up phase, slowly ramping it up and effectively adjusting the machine’s load behavior to protect mechanical components.
A new report from the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) makes a start on developing control schemes, process measurements, and modeling and simulation methods for powder bed fusion additive manufacturing.
If you’re developing a product with lots of sensors and no access to the power grid, then you’ll want to take note of a Design News Continuing Education Center class, “Designing Low Power Systems Using Battery and Energy Harvesting Energy Sources."
More:Blogs|News
Design News Webinar Series
3/31/2015 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
2/25/2015 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
12/11/2014 8:00 a.m. California / 11:00 a.m. New York
5/7/2015 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
Quick Poll
The Continuing Education Center offers engineers an entirely new way to get the education they need to formulate next-generation solutions.
May 4 - 8, Designing Low Power Systems using Battery and Energy Harvesting Energy Sources
SEMESTERS: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6 |  7


Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.
Last Archived Class
Sponsored by Proto Labs
Learn More   |   Login   |   Archived Classes
Twitter Feed
Design News Twitter Feed
Like Us on Facebook

Sponsored Content

Technology Marketplace

Copyright © 2015 UBM Canon, A UBM company, All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service