HOME  |  NEWS  |  BLOGS  |  MESSAGES  |  FEATURES  |  VIDEOS  |  WEBINARS  |  INDUSTRIES  |  FOCUS ON FUNDAMENTALS
  |  REGISTER  |  LOGIN  |  HELP
Comments
View Comments: Newest First|Oldest First|Threaded View
Page 1/3  >  >>
Cabe Atwell
User Rank
Blogger
Re: #2!!!
Cabe Atwell   5/30/2013 1:05:44 AM
NO RATINGS
BG,

You might have something there. Keeping on top of the chores of parenthood could help, bigtime.

However...

Matalan1 has a point. Drowning a newborn in today's wireless world, that close, at all times is not good.

C

William K.
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Of course we don't need it...
William K.   5/29/2013 4:18:18 PM
NO RATINGS
Nuvation is quite right, I think. Such a device would sell as fast as it went on the shelves. Not prinmarily because of the function, but because of the :cool" factor. That is just the way some consumer products work.

Now as for all of those frightfully neurotic folks in a panic about the safety of the device. NO, it will not be safe! Clearly the communists will modify the RF generation circuits to modify the baby's genetic code so that it becomes a republican when it grows up. Anybody could see that as the only possible reason for selling such a product.

BG
User Rank
Iron
#2!!!
BG   5/29/2013 4:12:42 PM
NO RATINGS
What is far more valuable, as a father of 6, would be a method for detecting #2 in the diaper.  #2 lingering for any length of time is the main cause for irritation/rash/pain, in my experience. 

This would be worth a high price, to me.  Happy backside = happy baby = happy parents.

ChuckHall
User Rank
Iron
Attention Deficit
ChuckHall   5/19/2013 7:01:42 AM
NO RATINGS
Seems to me that parents are paying more attention to their smartphones than to their children. Mother Nature has already given parents all the tools they need. Look, feel, sniff, and listen. But if you wait too long to use the first three and made your baby cry, then shame on you!

Sorry if I posted this wrong.

Cadman-LT
User Rank
Platinum
Re: How about electromagnetic signal emmission?
Cadman-LT   5/17/2013 11:15:32 PM
NO RATINGS
matalan1, I agree. Even if it turns out to be safe, would you want to be the one to find out? Not me.

Cadman-LT
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Of course we don't need it...
Cadman-LT   5/17/2013 11:04:51 PM
NO RATINGS
Nuvation, I agree..they will buy anything and everything that can benefit the child. No problem there. I just do not think this qualifies as one of those things. Technology should not replace good old fashioned parenting. That whole idea kinda scares me.

Cadman-LT
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Probably not
Cadman-LT   5/17/2013 11:00:13 PM
NO RATINGS
Cabe, too funny! Just because there CAN be an app for that doesn't mean there SHOULD be!

matalan1
User Rank
Iron
How about electromagnetic signal emmission?
matalan1   5/17/2013 5:45:23 PM
NO RATINGS
I wouldn't put a radio signal emitter close to a baby's sensitive part. It may have some effect on a newborn.

Nuvation
User Rank
Iron
Of course we don't need it...
Nuvation   5/17/2013 5:39:18 PM
NO RATINGS
But we all know that new parents will buy ANYTHING! I bet the tweetPee would sell like hotcakes!

Cabe Atwell
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Probably not
Cabe Atwell   5/17/2013 4:41:43 PM
NO RATINGS
I would like to keep my personal life private. Not let my twitter thread broadcast what private things I am doing.

While the are at it, they should look into TweetToilet, TweetShower, and TweetTP. Why not let the world know... dawning of a new age!

C

Page 1/3  >  >>


Partner Zone
Latest Analysis
From pitchers and forwards to quarterbacks and defensemen, we offer a peek at some of the more memorable engineers in sports history.
IBM announced it is dedicating $3 billion of funding over the next five years to research and development of new processor technologies.
A soundproofing invention called Acoustiblok recently won a television challenge to silence an air horn with only a fraction of an inch of polymer material.
Rethink Robotics has upgraded Baxter the Robot so it can be easily trained by co-workers who simply show the robot how to move.
Robots came into their own in the 1970s. Gone were the low-budget black-and-white B movies. Now robots roamed in full-color feature films with A-list actors.
More:Blogs|News
Design News Webinar Series
7/23/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
7/17/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
6/25/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
5/13/2014 10:00 a.m. California / 1:00 p.m. New York / 6:00 p.m. London
Quick Poll
The Continuing Education Center offers engineers an entirely new way to get the education they need to formulate next-generation solutions.
Jul 21 - 25, Design Products With Bluetooth Low Energy
SEMESTERS: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6


Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.
Next Class: August 12 - 14
Sponsored by igus
Learn More   |   Login   |   Archived Classes
Twitter Feed
Design News Twitter Feed
Like Us on Facebook

Sponsored Content

Technology Marketplace

Copyright © 2014 UBM Canon, A UBM company, All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service