This is odd. I was told it was common practice to slow the frequency just a bit during heavy loads, then raise it to compensate during low demand (at night). This was done to keep syncronous motor clocks from gaining or losing time, and that power companies were very careful about maintaining an average frequency of 60 Hz. Maybe it was after this "experiment" that they started doing this?
First of all, a generator running at 61HZ connected to a generator trying to run at 59HZ will turn the slower generator into a motor. You can't have a national grid with generators running at different speeds (frequencies). I believe I read the expirement in the 60's to vary grid frequency was a typical government attempt at trying to controll the laws of physics. It was ultimately unsuccessful and caused great upset in many industries. Today the national electric grid represents an extraordinally accurate time base. Crystal oscillators before the late 60's or early 70's required constant power to keep the temperature stable and had a significant warm-up time before they could be relied upon to be accurate. When telephone voice and data volume overhwhelmed the available bandwidth of telephone lines, MaBell developed a good-stable non-oven controlled series of crystal oscillators that allowed much better (and cheaper) equipment to permit multiplexing without the need to add infrastructure.
those 1725/3450 motors aren't technically "syncronous" thought they follow the line frequency -- the slip varies sloghtly with load and the base slip varies slightly with design, particularly for motors w/ hard to start or impulsive loading.
The true syncronous motors (very low output power devices, as used in older electric clocks and timer gear motors) do sync up exactly to line frequency, and over long terms (days to weeks) the grid frequncy accuracy is VERY GOOD. in the short term it is more variable than say WWV, WWVH, CHU (Canada) or (better still) WWVB time signals, but for most applications this was not an issue.
The case cited here is an exceptional case, though 57-63 Hz shouldn't create issues w/ transfomers and induction motors as say 50 Hz could, but, when seconds are important, can cause the havoc the radio station had. Guess the grid was a little off on their high frequency corrections, but normally they wouldn't be so far off.
Now adays it's easy to come by *good* quartz controlled clock systems w/ WWWVB receivers allowing resync at night when VLF propagation is good across North America from the transmitter in Fort Collins, Colorodo.
Re: the grid business ISO NE has some interesting on line data and N.E. grid information at: http://www.iso-ne.com/sys_ops/index.html
The power systems east and west of the Rocky Mountains have very few ties between them. To avoid problems with massive power flows that would take a tie line out of service, the connections are made through dc connections. At each end of the line is an ac to dc converter station. The operaters agree on how much power is to be transmitted and set the equipment to accordingly. The line can operate as a constant power source or sink depending upon the needs of the utilities.
Synchronous motors and induction motors are not the same. Synchronous motors run at a constant speed that is determined by the power line frequency and the number of poles in the motor. An induction motor's speed does change with loading. Induction motors are less expensive to build than synchronous motors and a quite suitable for numerous tasks like fans, washing machines, and compressors. For 1/4 horsepower to 2 horsepower motors, you may see a No-Load speed around 1795 rpm with the Rated-Load speed of 1750 to 1725 rpm.
The tiny synchronous motors in clocks were used for many, many years. Only when production costs of the electronic clocks fell to near the costs of the motor driven clocks and the public demanded features not readily available in the motor driven clocks did the electronic clocks take over. Even today, some electronic clocks use the power line as the primary time standard with a cheap crystal as a backup for power interruptions.
The power line is poor short term time standard but can be a very good long term standard. Other than the experiment described in the article, the utility maintains a time accuracy of plus or minus 180 cycles (3 seconds). (Utility standards assess time error as a number of cycles.) Over short period, say an hour, a 3 second error is almost 0.1 percent. Over a year, that 3 second error is slightly less than 0.0006 percent.
Robots that walk have come a long way from simple barebones walking machines or pairs of legs without an upper body and head. Much of the research these days focuses on making more humanoid robots. But they are not all created equal.
The IEEE Computer Society has named the top 10 trends for 2014. You can expect the convergence of cloud computing and mobile devices, advances in health care data and devices, as well as privacy issues in social media to make the headlines. And 3D printing came out of nowhere to make a big splash.
For industrial control applications, or even a simple assembly line, that machine can go almost 24/7 without a break. But what happens when the task is a little more complex? That’s where the “smart” machine would come in. The smart machine is one that has some simple (or complex in some cases) processing capability to be able to adapt to changing conditions. Such machines are suited for a host of applications, including automotive, aerospace, defense, medical, computers and electronics, telecommunications, consumer goods, and so on. This discussion will examine what’s possible with smart machines, and what tradeoffs need to be made to implement such a solution.