HOME  |  NEWS  |  BLOGS  |  MESSAGES  |  FEATURES  |  VIDEOS  |  WEBINARS  |  INDUSTRIES  |  FOCUS ON FUNDAMENTALS
  |  REGISTER  |  LOGIN  |  HELP
Comments
View Comments: Newest First|Oldest First|Threaded View
Page 1/3  >  >>
Jack Rupert, PE
User Rank
Platinum
Re: FRONT SEAT TV
Jack Rupert, PE   5/15/2013 4:39:14 PM
NO RATINGS
Interesting thought on the heads-up displays, bobjengr.  I still have mixed thoughts about that one.  On one hand, it does keep your eyes in front of you, instead of needing to glance down to see the instruments, etc.  On the other hand, I would almost think that there would be too much "stuff" in your field of vision that would be a distraction.  Anybody have any real world eperience that would prove one way or the other?


And I vote a bit NO on having front-seat TV.

Cabe Atwell
User Rank
Blogger
Re: new paradigm
Cabe Atwell   5/10/2013 4:22:37 PM
NO RATINGS
3drob,

At the state level there are bans on all video distraction devices. Also, people do not want to die, for the most part. So, watching TV is usually not an action in cars. However, texting is... and almost worse.

Also, the TVs in my car are disconnected... They drain the battery. They are cheap screens and the power supply is wasteful.

C

Cabe Atwell
User Rank
Blogger
Re: new paradigm
Cabe Atwell   5/10/2013 4:18:36 PM
NO RATINGS
Debera,

In California, any mobile device is banned for use in cars. Even hand's free options. This included GPS. But, I see everyone still using their gear.

C

Charles Murray
User Rank
Blogger
Re: FRONT SEAT TV
Charles Murray   5/7/2013 10:07:44 PM
NO RATINGS
Good point about head-up displays, bobjengr. As I recall, the "two-second maximum" that's mentioned in the earlier article could be lowered to about 0.4 seconds with a head-up display.  

Charles Murray
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Let the market decide
Charles Murray   5/7/2013 9:39:49 PM
NO RATINGS
The more I think about it, oldbikefixr, the more I think that the National Transportation Safety Board is right. We need to eliminate all the electronic junk, phones included.

Charles Murray
User Rank
Blogger
Re: new paradigm
Charles Murray   5/7/2013 9:37:20 PM
NO RATINGS
Good point, Nancy. Wouldn't you think that an adult driver would be able to distinguish between needs and wants, and would be able limit herself/himself to only the absolute needs while driving? Apparently, that's not the case, though.

bobjengr
User Rank
Platinum
FRONT SEAT TV
bobjengr   5/7/2013 5:37:06 PM
NO RATINGS
Excellent Post Jennifer.  I am totally opposed to TV installation in the front seat.  Rear seat --OK, good for the kids and keeps them preoccupied during travel.  Several days ago I made comments relative to a post that Charles delivered relative to this same subject.  In doing so, I looked up the stats regarding auto accidents due to texting, talking on cell phones, etc.  Approximately 30 % of the accidents were due to these two occurrences.  I'm one of these guys who says  thinks that "heads-up" displays for automobiles is waiting in the wings just to insure people stay focused regardless of what they do. 

William K.
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Let the market decide
William K.   5/7/2013 9:01:17 AM
NO RATINGS
My point is that if there were a simple and very clear law enacted that most folks would not be able to install such systems.

Of course an even clearer case is made for enforcing those existing laws mandating personal responsibility, but we have way to many people who deny the existance of personal responsibility for one's acts.

g-whiz
User Rank
Gold
Re: Let the market decide
g-whiz   5/7/2013 12:09:15 AM
NO RATINGS
"They have done it based on alleged emisssions, and they have done it based on crash worthyness"

....And this is why we have big, heavy cars with lousy mileage. The Federal government is NOT the answer to all of life's unpleasantries. They have WAY too much involvement in our day to day lives as it is. Were you aware that the Federal government is only SUPPOSED to do two things? National defense and protect our borders. That's it. Neither of which they are doing very well.

Of course you're not going to get a car with a liquor dispenser. You can install one yourself just like you can modify your car's existing monitor to display videos or TV. Not only do neither of these options make any sense, they're already plenty of laws preventing the use of either. DIU, Open container, reckless driving, etc.

My point is that more laws and regulations are not the answer. Common sense must prevail. Just enforce the laws we already have. We're drowning in them now and it's killing our economy. I'm actually quite surprised the feds didn't place an immediate ban on the over the counter sale of pressure cookers in light last month's terror attack.

 

William K.
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Let the market decide
William K.   5/6/2013 9:48:37 PM
NO RATINGS
"Consumers demand it???" How about a built in liquer dispenser for the driver, based on "the consumers demand it"? This is where our federal government should get into the action and simply say that "you can't sell a car like that here". They have done it based on alleged emisssions, and they have done it based on crash worthyness, so the safety people should certainly be able to stop it based on driver distraction, unless they have been paid off so well that they don't notice the problem. And some of their actions certainly give the impresion that they must be getting paid off to let some things slide by.

Please note that I don't recommend any form of booze dispensors in the front seat of a car. I have seen some of them, though. They were quite interesting.

Page 1/3  >  >>


Partner Zone
Latest Analysis
If you’ve noticed the recent news about electric cars and batteries, then it’s easy to wonder about the continuing wisdom behind public subsidies for EVs.
A slew of announcements about new materials and design concepts for transportation have come out of several trade shows focusing on plastics, aircraft interiors, heavy trucks, and automotive engineering. A few more announcements have come independent of any trade shows, maybe just because it's spring.
A group of collaborators wants to recast MacGyver or a show similar to it with a female protagonist as part “The Next MacGyver” competition, in order to get young girls interested in STEM fields.
Biomimicry and 3D printing have come together in new swarming ant and butterfly robots that act very much like their insect counterparts, the inventions of German robotics firm Festo.
Samsung's Galaxy line of smartphones used to fare quite well in the repairability department, but last year's flagship S5 model took a tumble, scoring a meh-inducing 5/10. Will the newly redesigned S6 lead us back into star-studded territory, or will we sink further into the depths of a repairability black hole?
More:Blogs|News
Design News Webinar Series
3/31/2015 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
2/25/2015 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
12/11/2014 8:00 a.m. California / 11:00 a.m. New York
5/7/2015 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
Quick Poll
The Continuing Education Center offers engineers an entirely new way to get the education they need to formulate next-generation solutions.
Apr 20 - 24, Taking the Internet of Things to the Cloud
SEMESTERS: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6 |  7


Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.
Last Archived Class
Sponsored by Proto Labs
Learn More   |   Login   |   Archived Classes
Twitter Feed
Design News Twitter Feed
Like Us on Facebook

Sponsored Content

Technology Marketplace

Copyright © 2015 UBM Canon, A UBM company, All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service