When you look at who contributes the most for the advancement of civilization, all these people "wasted their talents". They went for the buck, ego and fame instead of using their talent as they were meant to.
We can blame our society's value system.
Our engineers are under-paid, under-appreciated, and treated like a commodity by the big ego sector - that claims all the credit.
Where would anybody be without engineers? There would be no use for any of these ex-engineer's alter talents.
John Sununu's: "No level of glibness can get you through a thermodynamics exam."
the moral of this story is "Get the degree but don't enter the field if you want to succeed". Interesting that only one person featured in the article actually created something technical (Hedy Lamarr) but wasn't trained as an engineer, all of the others avoided the field entirely.
Thanks for this cool bit of information and retrospective, Chuck. A lot of this is news to me! I guess the moral of hte story is that engineering gives you a good basis for success in many areas! And it makes sense, given the intelligence and logic required. It sets the stage for all kinds of other skills, I think.
Charles, thank you for a glimpse of history. This was quite an interesting article. I didn't know there were ANY engineers in congress; maybe more engineers and fewer lawyers might improve the workflow in DC.
That's what I was afraid of, Dave. The percentage of women in engineering used to be accepted at around 10%. I don't know if it has gone up in recent years, but in the days of Hedy Lamarr and Alfred Hitchcock, it was certainly lower.
@jacksos1: Unfortunately, 1 out of 18 more or less reflects the proportion of women engineers as a whole (at least when it comes to mechanical and electrical engineering -- some fields, like chemical or industrial engineering, have a somewhat higher proportion of women). And several decades ago, which is when most of these people were active, the proportion was even lower.
I recently submitted an article about engineers in the U.S. Congress, which hopefully will be published soon. Joe Barton, who is included in Chuck's slideshow, is one, but there are a total of 15 in the current Congress; none of them are women.
I'm not sure why the male/female ratio came out the way it did, jacksos1. There could be a lot of contributing factors, but we certainly didn't try to limit the search to men only. I think the story of Hedy Lamarr might be revealing, however. Today, a great technical mind like hers would likely be encouraged to consider engineering instead of acting. The fact that we drew several of our candidates from that era might have had an effect on the ratio. Whatever the reasons, though, the fact that she didn't have an engineering education makes her achievement all the more amazing.
Digital healthcare devices and wearable electronic products need to be thoroughly tested, lest they live short, ignominious lives, an expert will tell attendees at UBM’s upcoming Designers of Things conference in San Jose, Calif.
Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.