HOME  |  NEWS  |  BLOGS  |  MESSAGES  |  FEATURES  |  VIDEOS  |  WEBINARS  |  INDUSTRIES  |  FOCUS ON FUNDAMENTALS
  |  REGISTER  |  LOGIN  |  HELP
<<  <  Page 3/4  >  >>
naperlou
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Printing building
naperlou   4/11/2013 10:53:11 AM
NO RATINGS
Cadman-LT, are the machines you are talking about CNC or manual.  Frankly, if you are making any volume of a part, then more traditional machining will beat out 3D printing any day.  While the up front cost of a mold or tool may be high, amortized over many thousands of parts the cost is cheap.  If you are prototyping or doing very small production runs of complex parts, 3D printing should be the way to go.  In addition, 3D printing can be tied to many CAD systems making prototyping and visualization very cost effective.  You should probably get some of both.

Rob Spiegel
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Printing building
Rob Spiegel   4/11/2013 10:32:34 AM
NO RATINGS
Good points, TJ. I would imagine there will be a number of hurdles in getting 3D houses into production. For one, I can't imagine a house built from 3D parts would be cost effective. That may change, though, as the cost of 3D prnting comes down.

Elizabeth M
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Slow
Elizabeth M   4/11/2013 10:19:13 AM
NO RATINGS
Well, this is an impressive project, to say the least. Although I personally think that's quite a lot of money to spend on something that's just to prove that something can be done. But I guess you have to start somewhere! I think it will be a long time before actual buildings that are up to code will be 3D printed, though!

Charles Murray
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Slow
Charles Murray   4/10/2013 6:14:00 PM
NO RATINGS
Agreed, naperlou. This is about proving it can be done, more than anything else. 

naperlou
User Rank
Blogger
Slow
naperlou   4/10/2013 4:49:04 PM
NO RATINGS
While this may sound cool, 3D printing is VERY slow.  It is very good for low volume, complex and one off shapes.  Take, for example, concrete forms.  To do it the traditional way, you have to make a form, then you pour the concrete and you have your part.  The longest part of the process is making the form.  If you only have one to do, then maybe you 3D print instead.  On the other hand, at 5mm intervals it will take a VERY LONG TIME.  It would probably be better to make forms with 3D printing and then just pour the concrete.  It would certainly be faster. 

No matter how you do it, it would be equivalent in terms of being environmentally friendly.  That is not a consequence of 3D printing.  Perhaps he should look at the energy used in the printing as oppossed to various ways of making the forms.  That 3D printer will be using lots of energy at the 5mm thickness planned.  This is a calculation that is often overlooked.

Jennifer Campbell
User Rank
Gold
Re: Printing building
Jennifer Campbell   4/10/2013 4:32:49 PM
NO RATINGS
Cadman-LT, keep us in the loop regarding your plans. I would love to see what you come up with, and I think our readers would too!

Ann R. Thryft
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Printing building
Ann R. Thryft   4/10/2013 2:15:07 PM
NO RATINGS
Cadman-LT, are you planning on building something bigger than a breadbox, like a house, or are you looking to make tiny parts? And by machining equipment, do you mean CNC?



Cadman-LT
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Printing building
Cadman-LT   4/10/2013 1:00:34 PM
NO RATINGS
All apologies, that first message errord out...did not mean to double post.

Cadman-LT
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Printing building
Cadman-LT   4/10/2013 12:57:39 PM
NO RATINGS
Also, I am thinking small...maybe 1ft X 1ft max, if that helps.

Cadman-LT
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Printing building
Cadman-LT   4/10/2013 12:56:13 PM
NO RATINGS
Also, we are only looking at making smaller parts. I am guessing maybe 1ft by 1ft tops, if that helps.

<<  <  Page 3/4  >  >>


Partner Zone
Latest Analysis
The phablet wars continue. Today we welcome the Nexus 6 -- a joint collaboration between Google and Motorola.
According to a study by the National Institute of Standards and Technology, one of the factors in the collapse of the original World Trade Center towers on Sept. 11, 2001, was the reduction in the yield strength of the steel reinforcement as a result of the high temperatures of the fire and the loss of thermal insulation.
If you have a Gadget Freak project, we have a reader who wants to make it. And not only will you get your 15 minutes of fame on our website and social media channels, you will also receive $500 and be automatically entered into the 2015 Gadget Freak of the Year contest.
Robots are getting more agile and automation systems are becoming more complex. Yet the most impressive development in robotics and automation is increased intelligence. Machines in automation are increasingly able to analyze huge amounts of data. They are often able to see, speak, even imitate patterns of human thinking. Researchers at European Automation call this deep learning.
Thanksgiving is a time for family. A time for togetherness. A time for… tech?
More:Blogs|News
Design News Webinar Series
11/19/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
11/6/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
10/7/2014 8:00 a.m. California / 11:00 a.m. New York
12/11/2014 8:00 a.m. California / 11:00 a.m. New York
Quick Poll
The Continuing Education Center offers engineers an entirely new way to get the education they need to formulate next-generation solutions.
Dec 1 - 5, An Introduction to Embedded Software Architecture and Design
SEMESTERS: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6


Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.
Last Archived Class
Sponsored by Littelfuse
Learn More   |   Login   |   Archived Classes
Twitter Feed
Design News Twitter Feed
Like Us on Facebook

Sponsored Content

Technology Marketplace

Copyright © 2014 UBM Canon, A UBM company, All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service