Looking back over archived stories, I had missed this one, now over a month old. I have several past product experiences using various conductive adhesives, and I had learned a very valuable lesson a few years ago.
Without going into specifics, I can tell you I had designed myself into a corner, and needed to get an electrical component connected to the main circuit. Based on its unique mounting condition, a conductive adhesive was the obvious answer. I simply plowed forward with the mounting method and the adhesive, and had first parts prototyped.
When the component didn't function properly, I learned the current required for the component far exceeded the current capability of the conductive particles in the adhesive. There was no way the adhesive as ever going to drive the component properly, and I was stuck.
This bad assumption kicked me back significantly, and I had to undergo a substantial redesign. That's one lesson I'll never forget.
I do see a serious potential for use with surface mount components, particularly the very small ones with sizes under one mm. Those parts are a big challenge to work with by hand, which makes prototyping quite a challenge. A conductive adhesive could provide some help.
It is clear that stable electrically conductive adhesives can be of great value in quite a few applications. So the usefulness potential is quite high.
Mant years ago I had an experience with anelectrically conductive adhesive material that I used to assemble a switch. The problem was that I did not realize that the material was conductive at all. The result was that while the assembly was fine mechanically, the switch was always "on", which caused me quite a bit of puzzelment, since it was clear that the contacts were opening as desired. The end result was that I had to use a different switch and a mechanical means of attachment. But it was certainly an educational experience.
Robots that walk have come a long way from simple barebones walking machines or pairs of legs without an upper body and head. Much of the research these days focuses on making more humanoid robots. But they are not all created equal.
The IEEE Computer Society has named the top 10 trends for 2014. You can expect the convergence of cloud computing and mobile devices, advances in health care data and devices, as well as privacy issues in social media to make the headlines. And 3D printing came out of nowhere to make a big splash.
For industrial control applications, or even a simple assembly line, that machine can go almost 24/7 without a break. But what happens when the task is a little more complex? That’s where the “smart” machine would come in. The smart machine is one that has some simple (or complex in some cases) processing capability to be able to adapt to changing conditions. Such machines are suited for a host of applications, including automotive, aerospace, defense, medical, computers and electronics, telecommunications, consumer goods, and so on. This discussion will examine what’s possible with smart machines, and what tradeoffs need to be made to implement such a solution.