HOME  |  NEWS  |  BLOGS  |  MESSAGES  |  FEATURES  |  VIDEOS  |  WEBINARS  |  INDUSTRIES  |  FOCUS ON FUNDAMENTALS
  |  REGISTER  |  LOGIN  |  HELP
<<  <  Page 2/3  >  >>
Elizabeth M
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Targeting Vehicle Complexity
Elizabeth M   4/4/2013 5:30:17 AM
NO RATINGS
Yes, it's interesting that a lot of industries follow the same rule in this regard, especially in the beginning of introducing new technologies, when complexity grows quite quickly and innovation can't really keep up with it. And as you mentioned, it's when complexity slows down that people can take a step back and see what's been created and try to come up with a better way to do than simply building on top of what already is there.

William K.
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Targeting Vehicle Complexity
William K.   4/3/2013 6:21:06 PM
NO RATINGS
"A single master controller" would be one huge nightmare from a number of different perspectives. First and very obvious is the replacement price, which would undoubtedly be over a thousand dollars. Not bad while the car is under the 3 month new car warranty, but a real killer for the second owner owner of a ten year old used vehicle. Next comes the fact that wswith all of those dozens of functions in one module, the wiring to that module would therefore consist of all the wiring that went to all of those modules. The resulting multipin connectors would be a horrible reliability problem, and a real pain to install and remove. Next comes the millions of lines of code that would undoubtedly have a few errors that would not appear until after the first few thousand cars had been sold. And have you ever heard of software that somehow connected otherwise unrelated processes? Just consider those possibilities.

Charles Murray
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Targeting Vehicle Complexity
Charles Murray   4/3/2013 4:27:08 PM
NO RATINGS
I like the ball of twine analogy, Liz. This ball of twine has been growing since the late '80s, when I first wrote about electronically-controlled transmissions. In 2007, awareness of the problem grew, but the the numbers are still creeping upward. The only difference today is the complexity is not growing as fast as it was 15 years ago.

Charles Murray
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Targeting Vehicle Complexity
Charles Murray   4/3/2013 4:24:10 PM
NO RATINGS
A single master controller does sound like a challenge, Cabe. Even if it could be made to work, there would have to be multiple layers of back-up.

apresher
User Rank
Blogger
Chip Suppliers
apresher   4/3/2013 2:38:50 PM
NO RATINGS
don2002, Agree with you. Those kind of standards are critical to the needs of these complex, interconnected smart systems.

don2002
User Rank
Iron
Automotive MCU's
don2002   4/3/2013 12:20:51 PM
NO RATINGS
The automotive industry needs to develop a standard similar to MIL-STD-1553 or ARINC 429. A common bus to handle all the data inputs. You could then have a common display(s) for all the systems to readout. You could see GPS information on the backseat DVD screens. The technology is already in-place just needs to be implement into an automotive frame.

Jammags
User Rank
Iron
Re: Targeting Vehicle Complexity
Jammags   4/3/2013 11:51:51 AM
NO RATINGS
A friend of mine has an newer SUV that requires reseting at least once per month.  This is dangerous when is happens in downtown traffic.

Elizabeth M
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Targeting Vehicle Complexity
Elizabeth M   4/3/2013 4:00:33 AM
NO RATINGS
Informative article, Chuck. This does indeed sound like a complicated problem. It seems like that the auto industry's microcontroller evolution has been similar to many other types of technology (I'm thinking of IT networks in particular): attack the problem with as many as you can first, then realize you've created quite a big ball of twine and need to scale back and take a bit of a less-is-more approach. I'm sure they will eventually figure it out and at some point there will be one super-intelligent microcontroller for everything. Then people will fret about that type of design, worrying what might happen if that fails...and the process will start all over again.

Cabe Atwell
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Targeting Vehicle Complexity
Cabe Atwell   4/2/2013 11:37:10 PM
NO RATINGS
100 simple MCUs or 1 complex processor?

The more complex a processor/MCU the more prone to failure it can become. Every PC I had locked up at one point, every phone eventually failed, even my graphing calculators would experience an error. Cars will need to be reset in the future like our smartphones, I wager.

Simple MCUs that perform one specific task with little outside connectivity are easy to test and ensure they will work the same every time. Not the case with more transistors onboard.

I'm not suggesting living in the past with cars... but better safety is needed. Hope that is the case.

C

Charles Murray
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Targeting Vehicle Complexity
Charles Murray   4/2/2013 7:58:54 PM
NO RATINGS
Yes, combining of functions is the plan going forward, Al. There are two theories: Domain control, in which electronics are clustered by function; and zone control, in which electronics are clustered by geography. I think it will be a combination of the two, with domain control rpobably being more prvalent. Either way, it will take a lot of computing power to bring it all together.

<<  <  Page 2/3  >  >>


Partner Zone
Latest Analysis
Enterprising Tesla Model S owner Steve Sasman seems to have figured out a way of recouping some of the cost on his car by renting the trunk out on AirBnB, the room/house rental website.
Everyone has had the experience of trying to scrape the last of the peanut butter or mayonnaise from the bottom of a glass jar without getting your hand sticky. Inventor Ron Jidmar thinks he has a solution to all of that nonsense with a flexible jar design that can be squeezed with one hand to lift contents from the bottom to the top of a jar or container, leaving the other hand free to scoop the contents out cleanly.
FPGAs are the glue logic in today's systems, but what they glue together are a variety of diverse sub-systems with different interface requirements.
Made by Monkeys highlights products that somehow slipped by the QC cops.
2014 was big dark year for cyber attacks. Here's the month-by-month blow-by-blow breakdown.
More:Blogs|News
Design News Webinar Series
12/11/2014 8:00 a.m. California / 11:00 a.m. New York
12/10/2014 8:00 a.m. California / 11:00 a.m. New York
11/19/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
2/25/2015 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
Quick Poll
The Continuing Education Center offers engineers an entirely new way to get the education they need to formulate next-generation solutions.
Jan 26 - 30, IPv6 for Micros – Hands-On
SEMESTERS: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  67


Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.
Last Archived Class
Sponsored by Stratasys
Learn More   |   Login   |   Archived Classes
Twitter Feed
Design News Twitter Feed
Like Us on Facebook

Sponsored Content

Technology Marketplace

Copyright © 2015 UBM Canon, A UBM company, All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service