HOME  |  NEWS  |  BLOGS  |  MESSAGES  |  FEATURES  |  VIDEOS  |  WEBINARS  |  INDUSTRIES  |  FOCUS ON FUNDAMENTALS
  |  REGISTER  |  LOGIN  |  HELP
Page 1/4  >  >>
Cabe Atwell
User Rank
Blogger
Re: IronMan effect
Cabe Atwell   5/18/2014 6:10:59 PM
NO RATINGS
Virginia Tech's THOR is pretty impressive. I wonder what has become of it, as there isn't any more news about it. Did he join the likes of Johnny 5?

Ann R. Thryft
User Rank
Blogger
Re: IronMan effect
Ann R. Thryft   3/28/2013 2:20:49 PM
NO RATINGS
I completely agree with you about human-like robots not being necessary for working in human-design spaces. I also think that goes for how human-like they must be in looks or operation: Some people like that similarity to humans, but some, like me, not only don't need it but find the uncanny valley effect horrific. OTOH, a lot of work has been done to help robots and humans communicate better so they can work together safely and productively. One of those things is designing robot hands to work more like ours for a number of reasons: http://www.designnews.com/author.asp?section_id=1386&doc_id=260644

NadineJ
User Rank
Platinum
Re: IronMan effect
NadineJ   3/28/2013 12:53:48 PM
NO RATINGS
It's true that clear communication and comprehension are important.  Acronyms and colloquialisms can be confusing.

Back to the robots...I don't agree that robots' "perceptions and movements should be as human as possible" in order to work in a space designed for humans.  Observing a cat or dog in a new space demonstrates that non-humans can navigate spaces created for humans as well as, or better than, people.

Ann R. Thryft
User Rank
Blogger
Re: IronMan effect
Ann R. Thryft   3/28/2013 11:35:43 AM
I find that using clear, widely-understood meanings for terms makes written, non-duplex communication much easier (spoken, full-duplex communication, like in a phone or F2F conversation, is of course usually a lot clearer since multiple, instant iterations are possible when needed). I also find that precision and accuracy are important in all communications.



NadineJ
User Rank
Platinum
Re: IronMan effect
NadineJ   3/27/2013 2:54:38 PM
NO RATINGS
I guess working in a creative enviornment leads to a 'creative' writing style.  I do lean towards the vernacular.  In my comments bio = human.

Ann R. Thryft
User Rank
Blogger
Re: IronMan effect
Ann R. Thryft   3/27/2013 2:43:10 PM
NO RATINGS
Nadine, thanks for the comment. I interpreted, "At the end of the day, all robots are bio-mimics.  Humans included." to mean what its grammar says, which is that humans are bio-mimics. It's hard to interpret that in some other way. In any case, I do agree about more precise writing and close reading.

NadineJ
User Rank
Platinum
Re: IronMan effect
NadineJ   3/26/2013 11:18:38 PM
NO RATINGS
Ann-it was a statement.  Sorry things aren't clear but I didn't say that humans are biomimics.  Maybe more precise writing and close reading would help.

It's good to stand behind what you write.  I do the same.

Ann R. Thryft
User Rank
Blogger
Re: IronMan effect
Ann R. Thryft   3/26/2013 1:51:14 PM
NO RATINGS
Nadine, yes I was responding to your comment. I agree that biomimicry doesn't exclude humans: that seems obvious. I've studied biomimicry in robotics, and saying all robots are biomimics isn't accurate in that area, although it may be elsewhere. But it's such a general statement that I don't see its usefulness from robotics engineering standpoint. And saying humans are biomimics doesn't make sense to me at all, since we are biological systems. In any case, my comments specifically about biomimicry in robotics stand.

NadineJ
User Rank
Platinum
Re: IronMan effect
NadineJ   3/26/2013 1:42:23 PM
NO RATINGS
Ann-I'm not sure if you're replying directly to my comment

"At the end of the day, all robots are bio-mimics.  Humans included."

To clarify, when I say that all robots are bio-mimics, I am referring to biomimicry in it's truest sense.  I've studied it extensively while designing children's products.

The line "Humans included" is to recognize that biomimicry doesn't just include insects and sea creatures.  Human beings are part of the biosphere and models for biomimicry.

Ann R. Thryft
User Rank
Blogger
Re: IronMan effect
Ann R. Thryft   3/26/2013 12:11:51 PM
NO RATINGS
Biomimicry in robotics, at least, doesn't mean generally resembling; it means something very specific. It refers to studying particular biological systems to see how they work, and translating their neurological, muscular, skeletal, etc systems--structures and/or functions-- into mechanical and/or electronic analogs. This is much more recent than the fundamental research type of approach that goes more like: what would happen if we made a robot with three legs vs six and used XYZ actuation types. Boston Dynamics, for example, was one of the very early pioneers in patterning robots after specific animals.

Page 1/4  >  >>


Partner Zone
Latest Analysis
(Video) NASA's Modular Robotic Vehicle (MRV) is an EV inspired by manned rovers used for space exploration.
Comedian John Oliver recently did a segment on patent trolls, offering a hiliarious take on a serious issue plaguing US industries.
United Launch Alliance will fly 3D-printed flight hardeware parts on its rockets starting next year with the Atlas V. The company's Vulcan next-gen launch vehicle will have more than 100 production parts made with 3D printing. The main driver? Parts consolidation and 57% lower production costs.
The new small-form-factor EZ-BLE PRoC (Programmable Radio on Chip) module is a derivative of the existing PRoC BLE Programmable Radio-on-Chip solution. The EZ-BLE PRoC module integrates the programmability and ARM Cortex-M0 core of the PRoC BLE, two crystals, an onboard chip antenna, a metal shield, and passive components.
The engineers and inventors of the post WWII period turned their attention to advancements in electronics, communication, and entertainment. Breakthrough inventions range from LEGOs and computer gaming to the integrated circuit and Ethernet -- a range of advancements that have little in common except they changed our lives.
More:Blogs|News
Design News Webinar Series
3/31/2015 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
2/25/2015 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
12/11/2014 8:00 a.m. California / 11:00 a.m. New York
5/7/2015 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
Quick Poll
The Continuing Education Center offers engineers an entirely new way to get the education they need to formulate next-generation solutions.
May 4 - 8, Designing Low Power Systems using Battery and Energy Harvesting Energy Sources
SEMESTERS: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6 |  7


Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.
Last Archived Class
Sponsored by Proto Labs
Learn More   |   Login   |   Archived Classes
Twitter Feed
Design News Twitter Feed
Like Us on Facebook

Sponsored Content

Technology Marketplace

Copyright © 2015 UBM Canon, A UBM company, All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service