HOME  |  NEWS  |  BLOGS  |  MESSAGES  |  FEATURES  |  VIDEOS  |  WEBINARS  |  INDUSTRIES  |  FOCUS ON FUNDAMENTALS
  |  REGISTER  |  LOGIN  |  HELP
Comments
View Comments: Oldest First|Newest First|Threaded View
Page 1/2  >  >>
Ann R. Thryft
User Rank
Blogger
What are the odds
Ann R. Thryft   3/14/2013 12:04:28 PM
NO RATINGS
Great story. This is the kind of tale that illustrates how much chance enters into problem solving. I wonder what the odds are against all those conditions lining up perfectly just so the real problem could actually be perceived, let alone what Rod then figured out to solve it.

Nancy Golden
User Rank
Platinum
It MUST be the test set!
Nancy Golden   3/14/2013 3:33:26 PM
NO RATINGS
 

This sentence made me chuckle,

"The mechanical designers and fitters were still adamant that it was my problem because they had checked everything else already and nothing else was different from the machines that worked perfectly."

As a test engineer, whenever I was called to the line to try to figure out what was wrong with a test set I had built, I would always ask if the operator had run the "golden" units we used for calibration, to see if the test set was working properly and the data was accurate. The answer was often no, it never occurred to them when parts started failing that their process could have shifted - it MUST be something wrong with the test set!

Charles Murray
User Rank
Blogger
Re: It MUST be the test set!
Charles Murray   3/14/2013 3:54:02 PM
NO RATINGS
I agree, Nancy. That same sentence jumped out at me. Making a diagnosis by exclusion (especially doing it with such confidence) is a great way to look foolish.

Tim
User Rank
Platinum
Bad Feeling
Tim   3/14/2013 9:04:54 PM
NO RATINGS
The feeling of despair when a part you made might be causing a major problem in the field is a bad one. Proving your product is not at fault to the customeris not an easy task. Good job finding the fault under pressure.

warren@fourward.com
User Rank
Platinum
Blame
warren@fourward.com   3/15/2013 10:52:22 AM
NO RATINGS
In a crisis you can tell who is the most valuable employee- he's the one who isn't pointing fingers but has rolled up his sleeves and is going over schematics, checking out the equipment, and is not paying attention to the positioning going on in the rest of the group. 

I admire the castigated engineer's diligence and sacrifice in getting to the site and doing whatever it took to get to the bottom of things.  I don't think I would have prayed to Scotty, myself, as I have another God, but I guess Sotty sometimes answers prayers, too, it seems.  :-)

Unfortunately, by not being in the political frey, it can sometimes cost one his job or advancement.  Large companies can often lose site of the ones actually making things a success.

I was also impressed with the relationship that lasted 20 years.  That is how real business is done!

 

 

 

mblazer
User Rank
Silver
Re: It MUST be the test set!
mblazer   3/15/2013 1:22:49 PM
In situations like this, the first thing to check is the part that absolutely, positively is 'not' the problem.  It's a sure sign that a conclulsion has been jumped to.

Charles Murray
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Bad Feeling
Charles Murray   3/15/2013 6:13:16 PM
NO RATINGS
Well said, Tim. A mistake like the one mentioned here would be a nightmare for most engineers. The nice part of the story is that he definitively proved that they were wrong.

William K.
User Rank
Platinum
Re: It MUST be the test set!
William K.   3/15/2013 10:46:07 PM
NO RATINGS
Nancy, those "golden" parts have certainly been lifesavers for me on a few occasions. Several organizations do have a protocol in place to stop production whenever there are three failures in a row. That does make sense because if the process drifts why make bad parts, and if the tester has drifted then why ship parts of unknown quality. The operator would note the failed parametr and then run the golden parts while the production folks would check the line. Usually the problem was a process issue on the line.

TJ McDermott
User Rank
Blogger
Weekend Service Call
TJ McDermott   3/17/2013 3:28:29 PM
NO RATINGS
You see the light, after being called in on a weekend, correctly diagnosing a problem having nothing to do with your company's product.

Who footed that service bill?  Did your company just eat the time (for that matter, did you get any overtime at all)?  Did you personally get a proper apology at the very least?

oldtimer8080
User Rank
Gold
Today's Reality Check
oldtimer8080   3/20/2013 5:37:38 PM
NO RATINGS
The reality today is that even when you make a similar effort to solve a problem, you need to prepare to lose a contract or get fired, no matter if you show OTHER PEOPLE to be the cause of a failure or not!

 That has been the reality for over 10 years now and my offspring is in the same type of situation where the Team Leader ( the position ) and the Team are blamed for the customer ignoring the requirements in a contract and getting predictable results. Even careful back- up notes doesn't change the management attitude.

The company is a major DR firm handling customer back up issues.

In my personal career, the last place I had a similar situation happen with a positive outcome was at Cray Research 25 years ago.

Now, the people behind the engineer sent to fix the problem get a threat and the Management  types at the client company will FIRE the Engineer AFTER a problem gets fixed and report that that was the solution at the client company....I've run into that same situation 3 times in the last 25 years, so when I go out into the Real World to a customer site, I've already updated my resume.

 

 

 

 

 

Page 1/2  >  >>


Partner Zone
Latest Analysis
Conventional wisdom holds that MIT, Cal Tech, and Stanford are three of the country’s best undergraduate engineering schools. Unfortunately, when conventional wisdom visits the topic of best engineering schools, it too often leaves out some of the most distinguished programs that don’t happen to offer PhD-level degrees.
Sherlock Ohms highlights stories told by engineers who have used their deductive reasoning and technical prowess to troubleshoot and solve the most perplexing engineering mysteries.
Airbus Defence and Space has 3D printed titanium brackets for communications satellites. The redesigned, one-piece 3D-printed brackets have better thermal resistance than conventionally manufactured parts, can be produced faster, cost 20% less, and save about 1 kg of weight per satellite.
A group of researchers at the Seoul National University have discovered a way to take material from cigarette butts and turn it into a carbon-based material that’s ideal for storing energy and creating a powerful supercapacitor.
Hacking has a long history in the movies, beginning with Tron and War Games and continuing through The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo.
More:Blogs|News
Design News Webinar Series
9/10/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
7/23/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
7/17/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
9/25/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
Quick Poll
The Continuing Education Center offers engineers an entirely new way to get the education they need to formulate next-generation solutions.
Sep 22 - 26, MCU Software Development – A Step-by-Step Guide (Using a Real Eval Board)
SEMESTERS: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6


Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.
Next Class: September 30 - October 2
Sponsored by Altera
Learn More   |   Login   |   Archived Classes
Twitter Feed
Design News Twitter Feed
Like Us on Facebook

Sponsored Content

Technology Marketplace

Copyright © 2014 UBM Canon, A UBM company, All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service