HOME  |  NEWS  |  BLOGS  |  MESSAGES  |  FEATURES  |  VIDEOS  |  WEBINARS  |  INDUSTRIES  |  FOCUS ON FUNDAMENTALS
  |  REGISTER  |  LOGIN  |  HELP
Page 1/4  >  >>
Ann R. Thryft
User Rank
Blogger
Re: CAVEAT USER!
Ann R. Thryft   3/28/2013 3:19:44 PM
NO RATINGS
Thanks, OLD_CURMUDGEON, you gave me a laugh.



Ann R. Thryft
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Conflict of interest
Ann R. Thryft   3/26/2013 2:23:18 PM
NO RATINGS
ttemple, you're right that some DN articles are product-oriented or contain product information, and they should be, since that's one of the reasons why engineers have historically read technical magazines: to bring useful and interesting new products to light. But in a typical technical publication, articles can display a range of focus on products or product details, depending on whether they are news or analysis, and whether they are contributed by a manufacturer, or staff-written.

Ann R. Thryft
User Rank
Blogger
Re: new Tab in Home page
Ann R. Thryft   3/18/2013 4:13:12 PM
NO RATINGS
Thanks for your feedback, Dave. Interesting observation about Japanese vs US companies. I've found the opposite to be broadly true when interviewing companies about their technology: Japanese companies have been far less likely to want to be interviewed in the first place and if they do agree, are much less forthcoming. Over time (since the late 80s) the gap has shrunk but I think it's still there. Considering that reluctance, I've been surprised at how forthcoming they can be at technical conferences.

Ann R. Thryft
User Rank
Blogger
Re: CAVEAT USER!
Ann R. Thryft   3/11/2013 12:33:51 PM
NO RATINGS
OLD_CURMUDGEON, thanks for the additional thoughts on this topic, and for bringing it up in the first place. I tend to agree with Tom-R's thoughts on the matter. I think a lot depends on picking the right model to fit the target goal. I agree about teamwork--when applied to appropriate goals and executed correctly, it can be extremely productive.

Ann R. Thryft
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Make it Open Source
Ann R. Thryft   3/11/2013 12:27:34 PM
NO RATINGS
Tom-R, thanks for your feedback. The network of known subject experts is an interesting version of crowdsourcing. The open forum we're discussing is meant to be a lot looser, but has similar goals. Thanks also for the clear discussion of trade secrets issues, and the suggestion about offline contacts: excellent suggestions.

OLD_CURMUDGEON
User Rank
Platinum
Re: CAVEAT USER!
OLD_CURMUDGEON   3/11/2013 7:58:49 AM
NO RATINGS
Ann:  I don't know that it WOULD be a problem, but with children suing their parents over trivial matters, and with out super-litigious society in general now, it MAY be something for one to keep in the back of their mind..... that's ALL I was suggesting.  Of course it's a good thing when scientific minds can collaborate & share technical ideas amongst their peers, but it would be a real shame IF someone were to become liable for a contribution due to an overzealous "ambulance chaser" type.

In my earlier decades' design role, we always worked on large-scale projects as a team.  Even technicians were brought into the collaboration, not only to learn, but also to be an active part in the design process.  These groups worked well, and the products' that became "alive" served their purpose well for many years.

 

Ann R. Thryft
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Great idea
Ann R. Thryft   3/8/2013 12:01:12 PM
NO RATINGS
Nancy, thanks for all those specific suggestions and excellent questions. Just what we're lookiing for at this stage. And thanks to Warren for a good example of why crowd-sourcing one's experiential database in a forum like this one can be a good idea.



Ann R. Thryft
User Rank
Blogger
Re: OK... I Looked Over &
Ann R. Thryft   3/8/2013 11:58:42 AM
NO RATINGS
Ceylon0, that may not be as far off as one might think, based on what I've seen in nanodevices, self-assembling devices and programmable materials (and BTW that was my slideshow). But--please hold that thought!

Ann R. Thryft
User Rank
Blogger
Re: CAVEAT USER!
Ann R. Thryft   3/8/2013 11:57:19 AM
NO RATINGS
OLD_CURMUDGEON, thanks for raising that issue. But I don't see why that would be any more a problem here than on the comment boards we already have. The whole point is a free expression of ideas and the purpose is to aid in better designs and solve new and challenging design problems. So it would be expected that some of the ideas would be adopted by readers in their work. I think it's highly unlikely any ideas discussed here would be specific enough to be patentable.

warren@fourward.com
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Web Forums
warren@fourward.com   3/8/2013 10:39:30 AM
NO RATINGS
There is an old adage, "There is no such thing as a stupid question."  I beg to differ, but I do think "There is no such thing as a bad idea." 

Years ago I was developing a scanning laser ophthalmoscope for Coopervision and the subject of using the 633nm HeNe for doing graphics came up.  I thought it was a bad idea and a waste of time.  Little did I know it became the most useful function of the instrument.

There may be stupid questions, but I don't see any bad ideas.  It just may not be their time, yet (flying cars, personal helicopters, transporters, warp drive...) 

Page 1/4  >  >>


Partner Zone
Latest Analysis
Tesla Motors Inc. took another big step into the battery market last night, officially unveiling a strategy that would enable it to sell batteries into home and grid storage applications.
At some point in the distant future, we may all be driving electric cars. Until then, however, the debate over their ongoing viability rages on.
Machine vision and video streaming systems are used for a variety of purposes, and each has applications for which it is best suited. This denotes that there are differences between them, and these differences can be categorized as the type of lenses used, the resolution of imaging elements, and the underlying software used to interpret the data.
Comic books long have appealed to kids as a fun way to introduce reading and art without being overly didactic. Now a software engineer and project manager from Oklahoma thinks the medium can be used to get them interested in STEM careers.
Sherlock Ohms highlights stories told by engineers who have used their deductive reasoning and technical prowess to troubleshoot and solve the most perplexing engineering mysteries.
More:Blogs|News
Design News Webinar Series
3/31/2015 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
2/25/2015 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
12/11/2014 8:00 a.m. California / 11:00 a.m. New York
5/7/2015 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
Quick Poll
The Continuing Education Center offers engineers an entirely new way to get the education they need to formulate next-generation solutions.
May 4 - 8, Designing Low Power Systems using Battery and Energy Harvesting Energy Sources
SEMESTERS: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6 |  7


Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.
Last Archived Class
Sponsored by Proto Labs
Learn More   |   Login   |   Archived Classes
Twitter Feed
Design News Twitter Feed
Like Us on Facebook

Sponsored Content

Technology Marketplace

Copyright © 2015 UBM Canon, A UBM company, All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service